Rumor: Ducks trying to unload a contract in order to re-sign Rakell/Lindholm

Status
Not open for further replies.

dracom

Registered User
Dec 22, 2015
13,805
10,027
Vancouver, WA
If the Ducks want to clear space, the Rangers are more than willing to take Vatanen off their hands

should have grabbed him for Girardi a few years back when you had the chance. Ducks aren't going to trade the guy the just re-signed and made a big deal about it to season ticket holders.
 

Oscar Lindberg

Registered User
Dec 14, 2015
16,151
15,647
CA
should have grabbed him for Girardi a few years back when you had the chance. Ducks aren't going to trade the guy the just re-signed and made a big deal about it to season ticket holders.

Yeah, going to haunt the Rangers for a while that they didn't make that deal :shakehead
 

Number1RedWingsFan52

Registered User
Mar 17, 2013
40,243
6,038
Winter Haven Florida
If the Ducks want to clear space, the Rangers are more than willing to take Vatanen off their hands

So would tons of other teams, The only problem with this seeing that Anaheim needs to shed salary so BM will want a player on a cheap ELC deal so unless you've the cap to fit that contract in and the Rangers don't then they don't make good trading partners here.
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,281
10,208
Could Ducks fans explain the need for Bernier and his cap hit. Seems like that trade ****ed up their RFA strategy.

cap hit does not matter, the ducks acquired him after toronto paid out a 2 million dollar roster bonus, so he is a good contingency plan if gibson gets hurt, or when he has down periods. bernier slots in fine as a 1/b goalie who could play 30+ games
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,651
15,367
Folsom
So is Bickell and he's a rental. That extra year is a killer.

Why would anyone want to have Stoners cap hit next summer?
Cap space is highly valuable, and Stoner would take away over 3M.

Bickell is not an NHL'er. The Hawks thought so highly of Bickell that they were going to get more use out of the 950k they get by burying Bickell in the AHL over keeping him. That extra year isn't a killer when the guy you're getting is a competent 3rd pairing d-man. Now he's not valuable in any way and the Ducks will have to send an asset with him if they can't retain salary but it's not going to be to the level of a Teravainen or Crouse. It'll be less or if Anaheim is going to tag someone like Fowler with him, they will get a better return.
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
41,497
21,884
cap hit does not matter, the ducks acquired him after toronto paid out a 2 million dollar roster bonus, so he is a good contingency plan if gibson gets hurt, or when he has down periods. bernier slots in fine as a 1/b goalie who could play 30+ games

That just doesn't make sense, we have this thread because Anaheim doesn't have cap space to sign their RFA's without moving someone.

Bernier isn't anything special, he's your ok backup goalie.
 

taylorjonl

Registered User
Jul 3, 2015
510
105
Sandy, Utah
I checked the cap situations from eastern teams. At this point it seems that neither Detroit nor Montreal is able to make a deal where they take more salary/cap than Ducks.

I originally thought this too but I am not so sure anymore. Let me explain. This URL has the formulas for calculating cap relief from LTIR:

https://www.capfriendly.com/ltir-faq

There are two formulas, one where you can become compliant before you put players on LTIR, the other where you LTIR them before the season starts. Detroit is in the second category.

You can go over the salary cap by %10 in the off season which is $80.3m, Detroit is at $78m or pretty close, so according to that they could spend up to another $2.3m more, right?
 

taylorjonl

Registered User
Jul 3, 2015
510
105
Sandy, Utah
That just doesn't make sense, we have this thread because Anaheim doesn't have cap space to sign their RFA's without moving someone.

Bernier isn't anything special, he's your ok backup goalie.

Anaheim has the cap space, they don't have the $$.
 

Liferleafer

TSN Scrum Lurker
Feb 9, 2011
39,848
13,005
That just doesn't make sense, we have this thread because Anaheim doesn't have cap space to sign their RFA's without moving someone.

Bernier isn't anything special, he's your ok backup goalie.

Leafs paid his bonus and retained half.
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,281
10,208
That just doesn't make sense, we have this thread because Anaheim doesn't have cap space to sign their RFA's without moving someone.

Bernier isn't anything special, he's your ok backup goalie.

ducks have a self imposed budget, the cap does not matter, total dollar amount does

bernier provides what the ducks need, an experienced goalie, who can step in to play for extended periods if needed
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
101,061
14,934
Somewhere on Uranus
ducks have a self imposed budget, the cap does not matter, total dollar amount does

bernier provides what the ducks need, an experienced goalie, who can step in to play for extended periods if needed

also--Benier is signed for one year and is there for one reason only--If Gibson falls


Bernier is a goalie who behind a good d will look good
 

Nylanderthal

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
7,901
6,252
Could Ducks fans explain the need for Bernier and his cap hit. Seems like that trade ****ed up their RFA strategy.

It was more than likely part of the Andersen deal. Anaheim just waited for Toronto to pay out the bonus on July 1st to save some cash. Then the deal shakes out as 30th + 2017 2nd + bernier for Andersen.
 

Vipers31

Advanced Stagnostic
Aug 29, 2008
20,393
2,206
Cologne, Germany
I think Carlyle liked him so much that he brought him over to Anaheim.

Carlyle isn't in charge of making such decisions. But for Murray, it probably doesn't hurt knowing a goalie has played his best hockey under your coach. There weren't too many 1B goaltenders available this summer - Bernier at a $2.15M salary checks the boxes of what the Ducks were looking for better than most options.
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
41,497
21,884
Anaheim has the cap space, they don't have the $$.

7.5M cap space for Lindholm and Rakell, one of them is asking something around 6M and the other something around 4M.

Sign 1M goalie and run with, save money, save 3M in cap hit.

Lindholm-Vatanen
Fowler- Despres
Theo- Bieksa
and try to win the Cup, Bernier won't carry them, or make an impact like Fowler can to that D-group.
 
Last edited:

robbieboy3686

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
3,353
2,255
Pierre never said anything about a significant contract, the guy who posted the tweet was way off on how he posted it. He said a player, who he did not want to name out of respect for said player, and then he said, "let's say Ducks are in trade talks to move a highly valued player, to an east coast team." They were discussing Rakell and Lindholm's contracts and how Anaheim will have to free up space somehow. The size of contract for the player being moved was never discussed. He didn't want to say Fowler, since Fowler has already dealt with the consistent trade chatter at the deadline.

Now to the Fowler trade. Guys can dream that they will get Fowler without giving up a player you wouldn't want to lose, but you would be doing just that, dreaming. If Ducks just wanted to clear cap space, they find a way to move Stoner or even trade Despres. Moving just one of those guys would clear enough space. BM has said that he wouldn't move Fowler unless he got a good return. There's enough teams looking for a player like Fowler, that BM will be getting a good return.

Ty exactly on point the entire post
 

Exit Dose

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
29,203
3,336
Georgia
7.5M cap space for Lindholm and Rakell, one of them is asking something around 6M and the other something around 4M.

Sign 1M goalie and run with, save money, save 3M in cap hit.

Lindholm-Vatanen
Fowler- Despres
Theo- Bieksa
and try to win the Cup, Bernier won't carry them, or make an impact like Fowler can to that D-group.

Gibson hasn't shown he can carry them either, so no, it was important to get someone like Bernier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad