How much time does Anaheim have to sign Rakell and Lindholm? start of the regular season?
How much time does Anaheim have to sign Rakell and Lindholm? start of the regular season?
Buffalo (after signing Risto) and Detroit will have a tough time making the cap work.
NJ would have to be a mostly futures based deal. (Boucher+ as they don't have cost controlled top 6 forwards to spare)
I'm guessing the Ducks are trying to push a Spooner deal and Sweeney is trying to just do enough to beat out NJ without losing Spooner. When the Bruins moved out Lucic, Sweeney said they wanted to have the cap space to take advantage of another team like the Bruins had been taken advantaged of with Boychuk and Hamilton. Here is his chance.
"Significant contract". Is it in terms of cap hit/salary or the caliber of the player?
I'm not sure is Despres a "significant". Stoner's contract is not significant despite it having a significant impact on Ducks. Fowler is a significant player, but not sure is his contract a significant?
That is why I mentioned kesler. It is someone someone we are not expecting
I'm pretty sure in a context like this a $4M contract would be labeled "significant". Heck, the opposite of an "insignificant contract" would usually be reserved to guys in the $1M range."Significant contract". Is it in terms of cap hit/salary or the caliber of the player?
I'm not sure is Despres a "significant". Stoner's contract is not significant despite it having a significant impact on Ducks. Fowler is a significant player, but not sure is his contract a significant?
Mentioning Kesler still made no sense, on any level. NTC, he wants to go nowhere, Ducks want him to go nowhere, as he's a crucial part of the team that's looking to win now. There's no reason to believe it's someone we're not expecting.That is why I mentioned kesler. It is someone someone we are not expecting
Unless Buffalo goes higher than $6M with Ristolainen, they've got just a shade higher than $4M available.
McCormick is retired, and they are at 23 contracts on the roster on capfriendly.
"Significant contract". Is it in terms of cap hit/salary or the caliber of the player?
I'm not sure is Despres a "significant". Stoner's contract is not significant despite it having a significant impact on Ducks. Fowler is a significant player, but not sure is his contract a significant?
That is why I mentioned kesler. It is someone someone we are not expecting
Fowler will definitely be gone... Ducks need to open a spot for Theodore
and then hopefully Stoner or someone
Despres to Devils book it he checks off all the boxes for their tradeable defensemen.
Defensemen good enough to actually be wanted... Fowler and Despres
Defensemen meh enough for the Ducks not to miss them ... Despres, Stoner, Bieska
Ducks defenders who were drafted by a sitting GM in the East with cap space to spare... Despres.
Personally as much as Shero pissed me off bu te end of his tenure hes starting to scare the h*ll outta me in NJ. Got Palmieri, Hall for Larson a 2nd and a 3rd. And i wouldnt doubt he finds a way to get an easy D upgrade even if its a blah guy like Stoner.
That is why I mentioned kesler. It is someone someone we are not expecting
I'm pretty sure in a context like this a $4M contract would be labeled "significant". Heck, the opposite of an "insignificant contract" would usually be reserved to guys in the $1M range.
Perhaps. But but it would have been a lot more clearer to speak about "significant PLAYER", because phrasing it like that, really doesn't tell us much.
But I think that tweet tells us that the contract is not likely going to be a "hockey trade", rather than a trade involving picks/prospects. You don't "unload" or "create space", if there is coming at least close to comparable salary back.
no one is going to take stoner's coin unless the ducks are obtaining another bad contract.
despres has promise and some to offer, IMO.
Maybe the wings are still in talks for Fowler, but then again that would mean someone needs to go back the other way. so maybe not, unless theyll take pick instead.
they should look to unload kesler, he's not worth 6.8m but i cant see anyone taking that on.
I personally never expected comparable salary coming back - in regards to the "unloading", from what's been said about the actual source in this thread, that wasn't actually what was said. That would indeed have a much more distinct connotation.
I'd tend to agree. Fowler would seem like the most logical candidate, also factoring in Theodore stepping in for whoever moves out.And at this point Fowler seems to be the most likely player to be moved. Despres doesn't free that much of actual salary. The other possibility is that B.Murray has decided to give a high end prospect along with a contract dump.
What was the original quote? I don't think I have seen it, then.
Almost word for word:
"I will not say the players name only because I don't think it's appropriate, but they are trying to move a high valued target to a team in the east. There have been a lot of discussions. Talking to at least two teams in the east."
I'd tend to agree. Fowler would seem like the most logical candidate, also factoring in Theodore stepping in for whoever moves out.
This is what I've seen:
I'd tend to agree. Fowler would seem like the most logical candidate, also factoring in Theodore stepping in for whoever moves out.
This is what I've seen: