Would the original trade be better if we added a player, like let say, Anderson aka a good/useful player to help the team now?
Or if we added picks?
Or instead of two of Roy/Kidney/Barron, that we upgrade that to of choice of either Mesar or Beck?
What would be more palatable?
Anderson is legit guy now. Monahan is not.
see comments below
Anderson is a long term cap dump, so no he doesn't help.
Correctimundo, see comments below.
If we were to trade (we're not trading him), it would be for 1st +
Wow!
And you say I overrate my assets!!
right NOW at 5.5 x 5, Anderson IS a short term + but a long term cap dump, acquiring club has to protect vs risk his contract is toxic latter half on.
For that reason, you MUST eat the max
but that may not be enough given 5 mo yrs term on a guy who plays a physical, energetic game but will wind up mid 30s
To make Andy desirable, you prob need to flip him to a 3rd team, who will then retain again, so he goes from 2.75 to like 2.
And to answer your question, yes if you can deal with the above, Anderson is a positive add right now who would defray and mitigate loss of PLD production right now --- but not at full salary pop. You MUST deal w/salary + term by retaining if not also getting it reduced further
He might not be an asset WPG wants, but he's far from being a cap dump. Calling him that just shows you don't know hockey.
He is not a cap dump now IN A VACUUM, but outside that vac, acknowledging his full term, he is to be considered a cap dump as acquiring team must protect vs production falloff as he ages
Dvorak is a liability, getting ripped in shot share again This year like he always does. Habs can keep that mistake.
On this we agree.
Glad Rangers avoided stupid win now calls to acquire