I know you need to do your own due diligence, but when Hunter and Dubas were first brought in as AGMs the thought was one of them would be Lou's successor. The fact the he went with one of them means his plan is still in place. Shanahan was pretty much in a no-win situation for some people.
I'm not trying to be harsh or critical of those that may have preferred Hunter over Dubas for clear reasons, but his choices were:
1) Dubas -> Those that prefer Hunter would be upset
2) Hunter -> Those that prefer Dubas would be upset.
3) Outsider -> Well what was the point of hiring Hunter/Dubas. What about the plan!
I just go back to Lou's hiring where he said if Dubas wasn't the GM in 3 years it would be Dubas' own fault.
Now Shanahan at least thought about looking outside and didn't just go with "It's either Hunter or Dubas". It seems he was obviously happy with how they were doing. And clearly Dubas did all the right things (Marlies and likely more we don't know about publically) to be the next GM.
I do get the not everyone will be happy with this hire, and the Dubas is still unproven at the NHL level (as is Hunter), and if there are slip ups the criticism will be huge. I like the move because it is going with the plan we've be told. That obviously could change.
I'm also not saying he just went with the 'safe path' by going with Dubas either. It really does seem he was thinking about this for a bit.
that's fair. (heehe i feel you are kinda talking to me). and I'll admit, I am very methodical in my thinking. (no one can stand grocery shopping with me, because it takes forever).
I know for me (in several threads), i've stated my issues with Kyle were the following.
1: I didn't like how he ran the draft and his moves as interim GM. fair/not fair. this doesn't mean he can't do better (obviously) just. i didn't like what I saw. If he didn't have that, imo I'd probably be more receptive of the idea
2: I really liked Fenton/NSH angle. I know others liked Futa etc. so i wasn't banging the "Experience Old Guy" drum, I just felt that Fenton has had more connections he can draw on to (for example) build the scouting team should everyone goes. Does Dubas, we'll see right?
3: for me the key part of the "Plan" wasn't the "Plan" it's the Vision. The Vision stays constant - the Plan changes (ie: what if we lost Matthews - the plan changes, what if were Buffalo, plan changes again, what if we we were in the catbird seat, plan changes again). for me (and I'll drop it i swear haha), is Kyle part of the vision (ie: that was never changing). if so. why? (which is never going to be answered really) or if he was the plan, why not do more work to see. according to him, he did. so. move on
4: the Analytical + Youth angle - kinda bugs me. I am not gonna say that's all Kyle does that's not fair. and again him being
young isn't just an issue however, fairly or unfairly, if you look at the two teams who wanted to Go YOUNG (Arizona) and Really go Analytical, (Florida) it severely blew up in their faces. and I think for Toronto especially because the team imo is still so fragile it could be kinda sketch. However, i also said 3 years ago that people have experiences in different avenues.
Dubas is gonna have a really tough summer ahead of him. Lou (and I gave him heck for it) was very passive. I don't think Dubas (or anyone else who had gotten the job) can afford to be passive anymore. there is a lot of choppy waters ahead and it will be interesting to see how he navigates it. However, as I've said - I'll totally be supportive until Kyle does a number of things to shake that support.