This is my issue as well.
Chicago won 3 Stanley Cups prior to being top heavy with contracts.
They have won nothing since they signed Kane and Toews to their inflated contracts. Those contracts have forced them to move out player after player in an effort to find cheaper bottom roster versions. So again...what have they won in that time....nothing. I dont even think that they have won a playoff series.
I am not suggesting that is going to be the fate of the Oilers as well but what I am suggesting is that when you are top heavy its damn hard to fill out the rest of the roster with cheap players. Damn hard.
With this contract not only are the Oilers paying $21M for their top 2 players (just like Chicago) they now have to find cheap alternatives for the bottom half of the roster...just like Chicago.
The Draisaitl contract is a game changer, not only 2nd contracts around the League, but for any Oiler contract that is coming up in the next year or so. (ie...Maroon).
Chiarellis job just became a whole lot tougher and its his own doing that made it that way.
To me, the Klefbom and Larsson contracts completely cover the pressure that the McDavid and Drai contracts give. There is no excuse not to have a deep roster. The RNH situation is much bigger than the cap, and he needs to prove he's worth 6 million AAV whether we have cap space or not, and if we gained that 6 million in space it would basically remove our cap issues outright. Not only that, but I think Chia will find a way to keep RNH if he can prove he's worth his cash this season.
Every team out there has an identity based around their weaknesses as much as their strengths. The cap ensures that no one can have it all. Pittsburgh won the cup with big contracts surrounded by small ones, all while missing Letang.
As for Chicago, they were #1 in the west this year. They are still a great team. Getting swept in the playoffs doesn't take away from that, and I don't see how you could show that the cap is the reason that they got swept. This is nothing like after their 2010 cup where there was an exodus of players like Buff and Ladd.
And imo, the pressing problem in Chicago has more to do with the decline of Seabrook than the Kane and Toews deals. Maybe even a decline in Keith and of course the decline and loss of Hossa. They are getting older, and finding new elite D is not about how much cap space you have. That is why they for Murphy. It's moreso to find a gem somewhere than it is for cap issues. A good GM can fulfill both goals at once, and it is because that team has players like Toews and Kane that Murphy has any chance of becoming great.