Ghost of jas
Unsatisfied
Rangers would have to get a mid round pick for Bokk or Kaut
Bokk moreso than Kaut.
Rangers would have to get a mid round pick for Bokk or Kaut
So they would move up for Tkachuk and not Wahlstrom? FML!I think it'll be Wahlstrom. But if they move up, it'll be with Vancouver for Tkachuk and the cost will be 39 and another pick.
Then we obviously have two different opinions....You cannot possibly take Smith or Veleno or Kravstov over him. Come one. I would easily take him above any of the players you name. To each his own, I guess.
That would drive me nuts honestly.Really? So they'd move up for Tkachuk but not Wahlstrom? Interesting.
Not saying Tkachuk would be a bad pick, but I wouldn't be happy if we traded up for him either.So they would move up for Tkachuk and not Wahlstrom? FML!
But he also lit it up at the WJC so ....He looks like a bozo
Also QMJHL is very high scoring and I don't think he translate to the NHL, and if that goalscoring doesn't carry over there's not much else he brings.
I can rationalize moving up for Wahlstrom with the lack of elite shots on this team, moving up for Tkachuk screams "grit" and"personality" and "character"Not saying Tkachuk would be a bad pick, but I wouldn't be happy if we traded up for him either.
Well then butter my butt and call me a biscuit, cause here we goooooooooooKaut can be had at 26 I think.
Rangers would have to get a mid round pick for Bokk or Kaut
Not even when they look like this...?Phil Kessel looks like your fat uncle and does what he does. You shouldn't judge a player by his face.
Gut feel on whether they will actually trade Hayes
I believe @Edge and if he says the Rangers are higher on Tkachuk than Wahlstrom and would move up for him and not the other is worrisome.I really don't believe any of these rumors.
When McKenzie or Friedman say it, I'll believe it.
So they would move up for Tkachuk and not Wahlstrom? FML!
I love Tkachuk, I just don't think he is worth trading up for.**** y'all, I like Tkachuk.
If Hughes goes 4, Kotkaniemi goes 3, based on the rumors there is a good chance that both Tkachuk and Wahlstrom will be available at 8 anyway. Dahlin, Svechnikov, Kotkaniemi, Hughes, Zadina, Detroit takes Bouchard, Vancouver takes Dobson.I can rationalize moving up for Wahlstrom with the lack of elite shots on this team, moving up for Tkachuk screams "grit" and"personality" and "character"
Although I was mostly rooting for them to lose, in retrospect, they should have won 3 more games and gotten Carolina's spot.All of the die hards can watch the 5g winning streak at the end of the season on their dvrs while the Rangers are picking 9th... or better yet... giving assets to move up...
Hey, as long as Hank is in net finishing the season ... that's what matter most....
Right???
That I don't agree with, but at least it's logical.I take it that they’re willing to move higher to get Tkachuk. They’ll move up for Wahlstrom at 7, by t pat a higher price to trade up for Tkachuk.
I can’t believe people here aren’t higher on Noah Dobson. I would be over the moon to draft a player of his caliber.