Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,075
- 40,935
FWIW: I compiled a list of trades in the salary cap era of teams trading up from 16-21 using only draft picks
Performances like today are why Seider is likely going to go higher than I'd feel comfortable taking him. The entire package is just so tantalizing that if it all comes together, he's a nightmare.
Seider’s concussions scare me off a bit but I agree.
I mentioned earlier that I might've been wrong on Seider's concussions, looks like it was his shoulderI think its so hard to know nowadays, teams are often extremely cautious. Like you see a kid missing a game due to a concussion sit in the stands laughing and looking 100% healthy the day after taking the hit. That is probably great by the team and its doctors, but it does changes the goal-posts quite much for when its time to start to worry about concussions.
I mentioned earlier that I might've been wrong on Seider's concussions, looks like it was his shoulder
FWIW: I compiled a list of trades in the salary cap era of teams trading up from 16-21 using only draft picks
Trash? How so? If trading a second round pick means moving up 3 spots to get a player that they think highly of, why not do it? That's what they did to get Miller.Dallas first rounder dream is out of the window, now watch us trash the 2nd rounder to move up 2-3 spots.
70th overall to move up 3 spots makes sense to me. That is what smart gm does, a dumb gm will use a 2nd rounder.
77 and 181 to move up 4 spots that we can only dream of.
That's not how it works, but I am not surprised I have to say this to you. The value of trading up, depends on the GM of the other team. Some of those examples I listed were actually initiated by a team that wanted to trade down, which lowers the price.
Example: Rangers trade up from 26 to 22 last year at the cost of 48th overall (2nd round pick). Right after that, Toronto decides to trade down and finds a team in St Louis willing to be a trade partner. They pay a 3rd rounder to swap picks.
So, who has higher upside, has the higher skill level and more boom potential- Broberg or Heinola?
So, who has higher upside, has the higher skill level and more boom potential- Broberg or Heinola?
That's not how it works, but I am not surprised I have to say this to you. The value of trading up, depends on the GM of the other team. Some of those examples I listed were actually initiated by a team that wanted to trade down, which lowers the price.
Example: Rangers trade up from 26 to 22 last year at the cost of 48th overall (2nd round pick). Right after that, Toronto decides to trade down and finds a team in St Louis willing to be a trade partner. They pay a 3rd rounder to swap picks.
Broberg.
Gorton should have waited with the Fox trade until the Dallas series is over now he traded away our top 2nd round pick which was almost as good as a late 1st rounder instead of making them take Dallas's 2nd round pick.
So far these conditional returns on our assets are coming up empty for us and bringing us less returns on our assets. Maybe he should stop them in future trades or he has some gambling fetish?
I will say that I'm a bit surprised Gorton didn't wait to see how the Dallas would have unfolded, but still really glad we have Adam Fox.
So Gorton shouldn’t rely on conditionals, but you’d rely on the off chance of someone wanting to trade down for whatever they can get?Some teams who for whatever reason fall in love with some player who would like be available in the late 2nd round are willing to trade down for whatever return they can get because they would draft that player either way.
We don't need quantity anymore. We have enough depth in the pool. Getting Kakko and another top 15 or so prospect is more ideal than Kakko, 19/20, and a bunch of lesser prospects.
IF Krieder is traded. But, yes.Grots probably knows he’s got another 1st in his pocket when he trades Kreider. Plus, it’s obvious that the Rangers see Fox being better than any player they could get at 37 or trade up to get from that spot.
Brogerg, but would rather have Seider. But not with the Jets pick. As such, am content to hope that the second rounders are Korzac and Beecher.So, who has higher upside, has the higher skill level and more boom potential- Broberg or Heinola?