Rorschach
Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
Well put.Gretzky at the top feels better than Ovechkin at the top.
Gretz should always be number one.
Well put.Gretzky at the top feels better than Ovechkin at the top.
Gretz should always be number one.
Gretzky would also need to bulk up. Otherwise he wouldn't last 15 seasons or have extended period of dominance.OV is already the greatest goal scorer to play in the NHL
Most Rockets in history gets him that honour
Gretzky would not be putting 70 goals in current NHL era. Hed be a 50-60 goal and 120 assist guy
Esposito lead the league 6 times and was 2nd to Bobby Hull another year so I certainly think he has a case over Gretz for goal scoring. But the list gets thin. Do you consider guys who were more consistent like maybe Bossy? It's hard right?Yeah, 9th or 10th is clearly ridiculous. No way players like Espo or Jagr rank ahead of him.
But it's as simple as that either. There were 620 players in the NHL in 83-84 with virtually no Russians or Americans, there were 973 in 07-08. Point being the talent pool Ovi competed against was much larger. Gretzky also doesn't have the record for greatest margin, that's Hull 90-91 when he scored 86 and the next best had 51.
Sure it was a higher scoring era but part of that was BECAUSE of Wayne Gretzky and the stacked teams comment is laughable, those teams were "stacked" because Wayne was the best player, it's like saying the Bruin teams Orr played with were stacked like Orr wasn't the absolute best player in the league or anything.Nevermind Gretzky being on more stacked teams in higher scoring era.
Gretzky at the top feels better than Ovechkin at the top.
Gretz should always be number one.
Why? Apart from Gretzky being a Canadian cultural icon, there’s no reason to be emotionally invested in him being #1.
How about Gretzky being the greatest player of all time and an all around class act?Several reasons I can think of...... Nationalism. Nostalgia. Double standards.
Okay but everyone saw what Lemieux did on some trash teams right?Sure it was a higher scoring era but part of that was BECAUSE of Wayne Gretzky and the stacked teams comment is laughable, those teams were "stacked" because Wayne was the best player, it's like saying the Bruin teams Orr played with were stacked like Orr wasn't the absolute best player in the league or anything.
Just amazing what some people will say at times.
Ovi shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence as Gretzky. Did people forget he spent the better part of his career disregarding the defensive end completely?
The thing is, Lemieux was also the best playmaker in the league, whereas that part of Ovechkins game doesn't even exist. Lemieux is the more skilled goal scorer - can't even imagine the crazy numbers if he devoted himself to only scoring goals like Ovechkin does.If Lemieux is the best, then no level of competition would have prevented him from performing the best of his era. Yet he objectively didn't.
Again, Lemieux has neither highest goal total, nor the highest adjusted goal total, nor the highest GPG, nor the highest adjusted GPG season of his own era.
The best goal scorer is not going to go without any of these things. Ovechkin has them all. Lemieux has none.
How about Gretzky being the greatest player of all time and an all around class act?
Gretzky is arguably one of the classiest and best ambassadors for hockey ever and has zero baggage.
People can have an opinion on who they want to hold the record but Gretzky as a player and as a person isn't nostalgic or nationalist at all.
But Ovechkin’s single season of 65 goals adjusts .002 better than any of Lemieux’s so Lemieux has no case at all. Plus Lemieux quit before he could reach Gretzky’s 92 goal record!
The thing is, Lemieux was also the best playmaker in the league, whereas that part of Ovechkins game doesn't even exist.
Man the good old false equvilancy or what not but then again not everyone is free to express their views.Gretzky is a class act?
Not to get overly political, but certain reasons why people dislike Ovechkin also apply to Gretzky. Perhaps you should look into Gretzky's history of publicly and overtly supporting warmongers and illegal actions that resulted in copious amounts of death and human misery.
This is what I mean by double standards.
Dude don't compare ovechkin to crosby. Crosby is a much better all around offensive player than ovechkin and its not debatableOvechkin has a hundred more assists than Crosby has goals.
I look forward to you claiming Crosby's goal scoring "doesn't even exist."
Ovechkin is top 10 in assists during his era. Out of thousands of players, Ovechkin is 45th all time in adjusted assists.
I don't know what Ovechkin does to make people say blatantly false things, but it's apparently his superpower.
Now, you could have made a reasonable point that Lemieux's playmaking makes him the far superior player. But I guess lying won the day in your brain.
Dude don't compare ovechkin to crosby. Crosby is a much better all around offensive player than ovechkin and its not debatable
Man the good old false equvilancy or what but then again not everyone is free to express their views.
I'll prvt message you as to why when I have time it's not for the boards.How is it a false equivalency?
It's a blatant double standard.
Lol no that illustrates he's a better goal scorer. Crosby has over 30 more points in almost 200 less games. And a +222 for his career compared to a +64 for ovechkin which is a huge difference. Crosby far away better at everything besides goal scoring to the point its not even closeOvechkin has almost 50% more goals than Crosby in the same number of seasons.
Ovechkin is very obviously the much better all around offensive player.
Lol no that illustrates he's a better goal scorer.
Yes don't think anyone has ever argued Crosby to be a better goal scorer. But Crosby wipes the floor with ovechkin overall offensively. While also being light years ahead of him with a 200 foot gameNo. It illustrates that Ovechkin is light years ahead of Crosby as a goal scorer. Absolutely mops the floor with him.
I'll prvt message you as to why when I have time it's not for the boards.