I'll take the opposing view in part based on the repeated use of words like "looks to be" and "should" and that this team, despite the revolving door of players lately has been getting progressively worse each year since their record-breaking '20-21 season.
- Berube's impact is a huge question mark. The team might respond at first as players always want to look good in front of a new coach but the history of this team suggests the players will win any showdown so it could get interesting if Craig starts making examples of players - specifically stars.
- Tanev is a big add but he does have an extensive injury history and he's not getting any younger. OEL was playing sheltered minutes in Florida, so my concern is that the money he's getting suggests a bigger role that he might not be suited for. We'll see.
- Special teams. Too much bad history of their special teams failing them in the playoffs for me to be optimistic. At times they've been lethal in the regular season so the talent is there but when it counts, not so much.
- Yes, they'll score a lot of goals. But again, in the playoffs there's no one in this group that's ever - not once - gone on a heater. I'm talking PPG+ for the stars, just taken over a series, etc. And the bottom six just doesn't have the fire power needed, an ongoing problem when half the cap is wrapped up in 4 forwards.
- Youngsters. As with all non-elite prospects it's wait and see. And not sure where they're going fit in, if at all.
- Goaltending. Woll has to stay healthy. Stolarz should be an improvement over Sammy but always be skeptical of goalies with strong numbers coming from strong defensive teams. And unless one of these two gets really good really fast, neither is a Bobrovsky or Vasilevskiy in the making. And considering this team's inability to score late in series, they really need a Bob/Vas.
- Lastly, it's rinse and repeat time again. Same core, therefore the same result. I think Berube could be the key to turning that around but I'm far from convinced he's going to get this entitled, over-paid, coddled group to buy into the type of hockey they have to play to win in the playoffs. In fact, I'm highly doubtful.
I appreciate the lengthy reply and thought.
It is a forward looking projection, of course it is going to have terms like "looks to be" and "should".
As much as you put thought into your response it all really boils down to you being negative because you don't believe in the core four, which is reasonable based on playoff performance, but that really is what your points largely boil down to.
(1) Yes, a new coach is a question mark. You are saying because these guys played and behaved in a certain way under the old coach and GM, they will always be this way? There are hundreds of examples of new coach, new culture and those that don't play along are shipped out or self-select out. You have no way of knowing how anyone will respond this season. Berube seems like a changemaker to me and has been in the past.
(2) Yep. Tanev is old and has an injury history. That's a risk. He has averaged 74 GP per year over the last three years though. OEL showed he can step up when needed, he played a key role when Ekblad and Montour were out. Then he settled into a role similar to what is being asked if him here...a #4 or #5 dman. Let's remember these two, and Haakanpaa are replacing Brodie, Giordano and Klingberg from opening night last year. This thread is about them being better than last year, right? Benoit could be even better and so could Liljegren, D take time to develop. Don't underestimate the impact Tanev and OEL could have on those around them, the other D.
(3) Special teams. Too much bad history is your comment. Even though the PK now features Tanev, OEL and possibly Haakanpaa. The PP might get OEL. Both will have new coaches, schemes and philosophies. See my original point about you not believing change is possible.
(4) Offense in the playoffs. Let's see what the regular season is like first, no? Also, I am not a big excuse maker but if AM and WN were healthy the entire series we won last year. It's important to note that when saying these guys don't show up. They both did and then were hurt, or were hurt and then did.
(5) Yep it is wait and see on youngsters. It is also a numbers game. We need a couple of a fairly large group to hit. We don't even need them to be stars, just contributors. Cowan, Minten, Grebenkin all could contribute this year. We have Hirvonen and Tverberg after them. Niemela did everything we could have hoped for the Marlies last year. Webber is an actual wildcard and Danford is years away. Hildeby has a strong showing and is 6'7. We have not rushed prospects and this should start paying dividends. Perhaps a little or perhaps we have a two top six wingers, a middle six C, a top 4 dman and two solid young goalies? To suggest none of them pan out is more negative than I care to be.
(6) Yep, we need healthy goalies. Woll has injuries but of the unrelated and fluke variety. Stolarz has put up solid numbers (limited sample sizes) in Edmonton, Anaheim and Philadelphia too. They are the biggest variable in next year's equation. If they both play to their career norms over a full season we are a vastly improved team.
(7) Rinse and repeat? Let's see. I believe they wanted to move Marner and may still do it. They couldn't or couldn't get enough value. So, one more year or running it back? Two of the core four are in contract years. That has to count for something. As does a first full year of a new GM, a new coach and staff, a new D, and new goaltending tandem, and youth knocking on the door.
To summarize, better goaltending equals better year. Better goaltending + new coach having an impact equals a MUCH better year...they got 102 points last year with the 23rd best save percentage in the league. Being league average would have them allowing 15 to 20 fewer goals.
So, if you just don't believe in this team maybe you should sit on the sidelines as a fan, if you believe change is possible then this could be another interesting year as a fan of a team on a journey.