He's made the same argument before in a different clip with Laine not following a forward behind the net while playing as a winger, so seeing it again in this context I'm pretty sure I got his original intentions correct. He's saying Laine as a winger should ignore his required positioning and run around reacting to who ever has the puck.
This play does have some similarities to the Tage Thompson/blown coverage from Laine goal shown recently. Yes, Voronkov is showing what you should do (and what Laine didn’t even attempt) in this situation, play defense, being the guy able to make the play,
stop the dangerous play, it’s that simple. Why are you saying “following a guy behind the net”, to downplay good reads, effort, and a defensive play made in order stop a goal??
Your ideas of what a players “positioning” or “responsibilities” should be in the defensive zone are INACCURATE. Especially in modern day, the players must play as a
5 man unit. Offensively and defensively.
It must be noted, that while Voronkov may be playing center in this sequence, it all starts from an opposing defender breaking up a play along the boards on Voronkov -in a stereotypical
WINGER area- and he almost immediately recognizes the opposing forward coming in who he eventually stops/disrupts an extreme scoring chance on.
Not only that, but, where are ALL the Ak Bars players when Voronkov breaks up that play and they start to break out of the zone? I’ll answer, since it will be ignored, they are ALL below the hashmarks, just feet from the crease. Why is nobody out covering the points/defenseman, like some here believe the wingers “defensive responsibility” is?? I’ll answer again, because they are not a threat in ANY way, as they weren’t in that old Thompson goal. Standing flat footed somewhat near people is not adequate defense.
Laine has played 2 games as C, if there's a clip from those 2 games showing how he's neglecting his C coverage then that's a different story, then we could blame him for it. I don't remember there being one though. Just saying that "he's not going to do this as C" is not a solid argument, it's a baseless claim.
Any clip I have shown or could possibly show will be excused or dismissed for some reason or another.