Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - part V

Status
Not open for further replies.

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
30,302
12,666

Looking at his numbers, including his measurables, I'm getting strong Tatar vibes.

Which in general is good, but specific to our needs I wonder. Most significant concern imo is he isn't getting a lot of shots on goal, under 6 per/60 on the season.

Looking at current Devils fwd's stats over the last 30 games, aside from the big 3 and Miles Wood, lack of sog's is a glaring issue.

But otherwise Labanc's #'s are very good.
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,721
38,294
Sharangovich played a good game too.

It's unfortunate that neither Mercer or Sharangovich were rewarded on the scoreboard last night because they both played very well.
100%. I also liked Boqvist’s game last night.

Tuesday I think they should go with:

Palat-Nico-Mercer
Rango-Haula-Bratt
Tatar-Boqvist-Zetterlund
BMW
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,526
100%. I also liked Boqvist’s game last night.

Tuesday I think they should go with:

Palat-Nico-Mercer
Rango-Haula-Bratt
Tatar-Boqvist-Zetterlund
BMW
Boqvist frustrates me. The occasional flash of skill, the decent-to-solid all around play but just nothing really enticing or sustaining gives me such Jacob Josefson vibes.
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,721
38,294
Boqvist frustrates me. The occasional flash of skill, the decent-to-solid all around play but just nothing really enticing or sustaining gives me such Jacob Josefson vibes.
I kind of get it, but he’s a pretty efficient player to me. He skates well, forechecks very well, isn’t a bad passer at all and I rarely notice mistakes, he plays a simple game but he has some skill. I prefer him to Josefson, and I’d like Boq to stick around.

The 2nd goal last night is all him.
 
Last edited:

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
30,302
12,666
Boqvist frustrates me. The occasional flash of skill, the decent-to-solid all around play but just nothing really enticing or sustaining gives me such Jacob Josefson vibes.
Boq has already surpassed Jacob's career goal total despite playing half the games, and never playing on the PP.

But like JJ he doesn't get enough sog's, and he oddly doesn't get many assists.

I like him for a 3rd line/depth fwd spot, still think there is some upside there, but yeah, he's a bit frustrating.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,526
Boq has already surpassed Jacob's career goal total despite playing half the games, and never playing on the PP.

But like JJ he doesn't get enough sog's, and he oddly doesn't get many assists.

I like him for a 3rd line/depth fwd spot, still think there is some upside there, but yeah, he's a bit frustrating.
I just see him as a part of a problem with depth scoring. He's a player that's not going hurt you but rarely will help you... I don't think that has a place in the top 9 personally, it's more of an extra forward description.
 

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
30,302
12,666
I just see him as a part of a problem with depth scoring. He's a player that's not going hurt you but rarely will help you... I don't think that has a place in the top 9 personally, it's more of an extra forward description.
Ya, go down the list. I expected way more from Shara. Wood since that early season run. Z since his early season run. Mercer's in there too. Maybe we don't expect much from McLeod and Bastian but they haven't given us much. Haula being the poster boy.

Holtz too. No he hasn't played much, but he hasn't earned PT either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nubmer6

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
29,430
52,769
NJ
I just see him as a part of a problem with depth scoring. He's a player that's not going hurt you but rarely will help you... I don't think that has a place in the top 9 personally, it's more of an extra forward description.
He should be the 4th line LW, but the turd is clogging up that spot.
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,680
50,605
I actually liked Mercer on the top line last night and Bratt with Sharangovich.

I liked breaking up Shara and Zetterlund.

They really have different playing styles, I think Z worked well Boqvist and Tatar.

I get why Haula was with Bratt and Shara conceptually but if Bratt is going to waste amazing passes on Haula…


D9F18439-076C-4BF7-977C-D6C8691F0D05.gif


(I kid, I’m all about the love!)
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,721
38,294
Ya, go down the list. I expected way more from Shara. Wood since that early season run. Z since his early season run. Mercer's in there too. Maybe we don't expect much from McLeod and Bastian but they haven't given us much. Haula being the poster boy.

Holtz too. No he hasn't played much, but he hasn't earned PT either.
Rango hasn’t been put in a position to play to his strengths and it’s costing the team. He had a very good game last night and he clicked with Bratt. He got 3-4 good looks. If he keeps getting looks like those, the pucks will start going in.

Mercer has looked fine, I rarely come out of games thinking he played poorly. Yesterday was another strong game for him.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,526
Ya, go down the list. I expected way more from Shara. Wood since that early season run. Z since his early season run. Mercer's in there too. Maybe we don't expect much from McLeod and Bastian but they haven't given us much. Haula being the poster boy.

Holtz too. No he hasn't played much, but he hasn't earned PT either.
Mercer? I think Mercer and Sharangovich are producing inline with their current roles and usage. Mercer is on pace to score 45 points mostly from the 3rd line... I'm not sure how much more you can ask from him in his second year.

Sharangovich is different in that he's a shooter/goal scorer and that tends to be a bit more streaky...still 11 goals in his diminished role is not terrible. The game he played last night along with 5 shots to go with it looks like he might be coming into a good stretch...these two don't belong in the same conversation as the others for not doing enough.
 
Last edited:

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,916
17,245
Ocean County
I just see him as a part of a problem with depth scoring. He's a player that's not going hurt you but rarely will help you... I don't think that has a place in the top 9 personally, it's more of an extra forward description.
While I don't disagree that he's eerily similar to Josefson, I think he's gotten kind of jerked around here similar to Holtz. Boqvist when he plays, has looked pretty damn solid in most facets of the game. Perhaps with a little more regularity with regard to being in the lineup, the offense pops up a bit more. I really dislike what they're doing with Holtz though. Playing 8 mins a month ain't it for his development.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,526
While I don't disagree that he's eerily similar to Josefson, I think he's gotten kind of jerked around here similar to Holtz. Boqvist when he plays, has looked pretty damn solid in most facets of the game. Perhaps with a little more regularity with regard to being in the lineup, the offense pops up a bit more. I really dislike what they're doing with Holtz though. Playing 8 mins a month ain't it for his development.
This seems to be a never ending theme of Hockey's Futures...almost like the chicken or the egg scenario.

Player doesn't produce...he sits or has time limited = he's being "jerked around"
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,005
14,923
Of the bottom 100 forwards in points/60 this season (minimum 200 minutes) exactly 0 are Devils, Boqvist is lowest. The Devils do not really have issues with depth scoring per se, it is more that they only have four players on pace for 20 or more goals. They're missing a 20 goal scorer or two; people scoring at a second line rate.

While I don't disagree that he's eerily similar to Josefson, I think he's gotten kind of jerked around here similar to Holtz. Boqvist when he plays, has looked pretty damn solid in most facets of the game. Perhaps with a little more regularity with regard to being in the lineup, the offense pops up a bit more. I really dislike what they're doing with Holtz though. Playing 8 mins a month ain't it for his development.

I don't think Boqvist is similar to Josefson at all, and the only thing that could produce such a thought is that they come from the same country. Boqvist is far and away a better goal scorer.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,526
Of the bottom 100 forwards in points/60 this season (minimum 200 minutes) exactly 0 are Devils, Boqvist is lowest. The Devils do not really have issues with depth scoring per se, it is more that they only have four players on pace for 20 or more goals. They're missing a 20 goal scorer or two; people scoring at a second line rate.



I don't think Boqvist is similar to Josefson at all, and the only thing that could produce such a thought is that they come from the same country. Boqvist is far and away a better goal scorer.
Josefson played on a team that was bottom 5 in scoring just about every single year, in a league that scored significantly fewer goals...

Josefson also showed brilliant flashes of skill once every 50 or so games or in a shootout... that's were the analogy lies.
 

NjDevsRR

Anything Can Happen In Jersey
Sponsor
Apr 24, 2012
30,227
62,721
Belmar
I liked breaking up Shara and Zetterlund.

They really have different playing styles, I think Z worked well Boqvist and Tatar.

I get why Haula was with Bratt and Shara conceptually but if Bratt is going to waste amazing passes on Haula…


View attachment 649291

(I kid, I’m all about the love!)
To Haulas credit, Bratt wasted an incredible pass from Haula as well. In the slot, in the 3rd, Bratt passed off once again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad