Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - offseason part III

Status
Not open for further replies.

OmNomNom

Taco is Love, Taco is Life
Mar 3, 2011
23,214
16,231
In the Church of Salmela
So whats the deal with Bratt

If its come February and no keaningful conversations have been had and you get good offers for him; are we shopping him at that point?

Or are we forcing it to the offseason to try and negotiate a third time and , if no, trade him then? Idk how that affects his value but I imagine it cant be good
If we're out of playoff picture then we gotta trade him
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
68,479
33,966
We don't gotta do anything.

It's Fitz who has to make that decision and I think he'll try and re-sign Bratt instead of just trading away for the sake of trading him.
I do think by the deadline they should know whether Bratt has any intention of signing long term before FA or not since they can reopen negotiations in January, unless he pulls a ‘I’m not talking contract during the season’ stall
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
I do think by the deadline they should know whether Bratt has any intention of signing long term before FA or not since they can reopen negotiations in January, unless he pulls a ‘I’m not talking contract during the season’ stall
It still boils down to what number NJ throws at Bratt as I see it. They have to accept he isn’t taking anything less than the UFA nunber the agent has in mind as a starting point. But if NJ says we will go seven or eight for eight million as an opening offer and Bratt says no and doesn’t counter then what more do you need to know?
 
  • Like
Reactions: glenwo2 and Billdo

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,916
17,245
Ocean County
It still boils down to what number NJ throws at Bratt as I see it. They have to accept he isn’t taking anything less than the UFA nunber the agent has in mind as a starting point. But if NJ says we will go seven or eight for eight million as an opening offer and Bratt says no and doesn’t counter then what more do you need to know?
If that's the case they need to move on.
 

Hischier and Hughes

“I love to hockey”
Jan 28, 2018
9,408
4,360
We don't gotta do anything.

It's Fitz who has to make that decision and I think he'll try and re-sign Bratt instead of just trading away for the sake of trading him.
It wouldnt be trading him away just for the sake of it, it would be moving him for his maximum value.

If we are risking losing Bratt in a trade then Fitzgerald needs to not lolligag while Bratt's agent forces yet another negotiation to August. Its either deadline or youre probably signing him to 4+ years

Trading him in the summer when other teams know hes a hard negotiation and thats why were moving him will return far less. Look at what Debrincat got and then imagine what it would have been before the deadline during the season
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,005
14,923
It wouldnt be trading him away just for the sake of it, it would be moving him for his maximum value.

If we are risking losing Bratt in a trade then Fitzgerald needs to not lolligag while Bratt's agent forces yet another negotiation to August. Its either deadline or youre probably signing him to 4+ years

Trading him in the summer when other teams know hes a hard negotiation and thats why were moving him will return far less. Look at what Debrincat got and then imagine what it would have been before the deadline during the season

Bratt is not at his maximum value in February, so that is not correct. His maximum value is before the draft in the summer. Kevin Fiala was a supposedly hard negotiator with Minnesota and then somehow he signed a 7 year deal the instant he went to LA, funny how that works. If Bratt has a location in mind, he also has a number, and all of that is gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

PizzaAndPucks

New Jersey Angels diehard
Nov 29, 2018
2,959
4,729
Realistically is Bratt is moved , what are trying to get in the deal ? I wonder what young NHL regulars would be on the table as part of the deal. I don't want a teams mid to late 1st round oickas a starting point. Really trading Bratt would just be a mess , let's hope he is willing to sign longterm as the season goes on. Getting a lesser talent in return with draft picks is a real kick in the balls to what we have been building the last 7 years...
 

Hischier and Hughes

“I love to hockey”
Jan 28, 2018
9,408
4,360
Bratt is not at his maximum value in February, so that is not correct. His maximum value is before the draft in the summer. Kevin Fiala was a supposedly hard negotiator with Minnesota and then somehow he signed a 7 year deal the instant he went to LA, funny how that works. If Bratt has a location in mind, he also has a number, and all of that is gone.
That just isnt right. No team is paying more for a player they have less time to negotiate with. Thats simple business
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,005
14,923
That just isnt right. No team is paying more for a player they have less time to negotiate with. Thats simple business

You don't know what you're talking about. It isn't about time to negotiate, it's about the fact that the season is over and just about everyone has cap room - the market opens up to just about every team, whereas in the playoff race, it's going to be just a few teams. Now normally that isn't a big deal, but buying Bratt as a 'rental' is bad because you have no idea what you're going to pay him the next year. That's not an issue after the season, if the Devils are going to trade him then, they're going to let the agent talk to other teams, and the contract would be signed immediately after trade (or maybe before)
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,690
50,645
Bratt is not at his maximum value in February, so that is not correct. His maximum value is before the draft in the summer. Kevin Fiala was a supposedly hard negotiator with Minnesota and then somehow he signed a 7 year deal the instant he went to LA, funny how that works. If Bratt has a location in mind, he also has a number, and all of that is gone.

Fiala reported original ask with Minnesota was 8m and he got a 7 year/7.875m deal from the Kings.

The Wild reportedly never offered him a longterm deal at any point and nor would they go over 6m. (I forget what the team’s rumored offers were in 2021 off-season but they certainly weren’t generous.)

The only nice part of this story, for us, is 8m was Fiala’s ask from 2021 off-season and it took a season where he scored 85 points (w/ 33 goals) in 82 games for him to almost get that. (Maybe he gets more if he was open to being traded anywhere, I don’t know.)
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
There still isn't any reason to believe he wants to play somewhere. Just that he has a number and it's been too high for Fitz.

They will have the cap space next offseason. They need to just pay him
They have the cap space now. The contract doesn’t start until next season. Do they really need Bratt to have another bug season to pay him? Have they not scouted their own player for his entire career? But now they will be convinced? Something is off but it’s unclear if it’s the team or Bratt or his agent.
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,690
50,645
They have the cap space now. The contract doesn’t start until next season. Do they really need Bratt to have another bug season to pay him? Have they not scouted their own player for his entire career? But now they will be convinced? Something is off but it’s unclear if it’s the team or Bratt or his agent.

They can’t extend Bratt until Jan 1.

They need to take some sort of break from negotiating, they just failed to get a long term deal done in July. Yes, that was bad and was an example of them not agreeing on what Bratt should be paid longterm. Hopefully that changes when months from now this can addressed again.

I don’t see what the point of speculating about this August is. (I mean, if you enjoy it, I won’t stop you, have at it, but I don’t see how we will get anywhere.)
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
They can’t extend Bratt until Jan 1.

They need to take some sort of break from negotiating, they just failed to get a long term deal done in July. Yes, that was bad and was an example of them not agreeing on what Bratt should be paid longterm. Hopefully that changes when months from now this can addressed again.

I don’t see what the point of speculating about this August is. (I mean, if you enjoy it, I won’t stop you, have at it, but I don’t see how we will get anywhere.)
Then negotiate in January. I guess I’m just surprised if the team is still trying to figure it out. If they don’t see Bratt as a true first line guy that should be paid as such then move on from him. He isn’t signing for $6.5 mil. It’s just not complicated at this point. If z Bratt isn’t signing for anything less than a gross overplay he needs to just be candid and let MJ know. They have had the time to discuss this and Im struggling to see what either side needs To figure out this season
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJDevs26

NjDevsRR

Anything Can Happen In Jersey
Sponsor
Apr 24, 2012
30,236
62,750
Belmar
Then negotiate in January. I guess I’m just surprised if the team is still trying to figure it out. If they don’t see Bratt as a true first line guy that should be paid as such then move on from him. He isn’t signing for $6.5 mil. It’s just not complicated at this point. If z Bratt isn’t signing for anything less than a gross overplay he needs to just be candid and let MJ know. They have had the time to discuss this and Im struggling to see what either side needs To figure out this season
HARK
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

NjDevsRR

Anything Can Happen In Jersey
Sponsor
Apr 24, 2012
30,236
62,750
Belmar
...the peter harold angel sings?
5E9DA5AC-54A6-483D-A589-AFDF90D68B01.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad