- May 8, 2010
- 21,720
- 38,288
I hope it’s more than that.I’ll go 1 year deal a few hours before arb, $5.3M.
I don’t understand why Brady matters, since we can’t swap out Bratt for Brady.
Is this an argument for letting Bratt walk if his demands are deemed too high or something?
I think it's just a manifestation of the old skill vs grit argument, and we all know both sides are dug in like it's the Western Front in WWI.I don’t understand why Brady matters, since we can’t swap out Bratt for Brady.
Is this an argument for letting Bratt walk if his demands are deemed too high or something?
I hope it’s more than that.
The Miles Wood thing is annoying me so much. If Bratt gets $5.3 million and Wood gets $3 million that’s such bullshit.
And that’s not even touching other massively overpaid guys because they were already signed for that amount for this year long ago.
*Cough* Blackwood *Cough*.
I brought up Tkachuk (Among others) yesterday when comparing young forwards who had gotten big contract extensions coming off "35-40 point" seasons to start their career. B. Tkachuk, Norris, R. Thomas, Fiala, etc etc
One of the posters was acting like it was absurd to even give Bratt $7 million/year when literally every comparable says otherwise.
I take the player that scores more goals over assist EVERY SINGLE time. Not really "grit" so much in this case...Brady is two years younger than Bratt and has scored 20 more goals in his career in 30 fewer games. Bratt 70 goals in 5 seasons (307 games) - Brady 90 goals in 4 season 277 games.And also, I don't think its a coincidence that the (few) people who said they would take B. Tkachuk over Bratt are probably older in age (given one of the guys brought up a Nets point guard from 1980)
Its fascinating to me tbh how much the older crowd loves their grit
I don’t think Wood is getting 3 million. If Devils wanted to make sure Wood got less than his QO, they would’ve elected to team arbitration.The Wood thing infuriates me because that 3m is the reason we don’t even have the cap space to give Bratt a large deal. Not saying it isn’t doable, but it would be problematic.
You can’t assume guys will stay on LTIR, capping out sucks and teams are simply not taking cap dumps this year. The market has changed, a bunch of teams have wingers they would love to move.
He made 3.5 last year.I don’t think Wood is getting 3 million. If Devils wanted to make sure Wood got less than his QO, they would’ve elected to team arbitration.
The fact that the Devils didn’t makes me think they know Wood’s camp will agree to something less than his QO.
I take the player that scores more goals over assist EVERY SINGLE time. Not really "grit" so much in this case...Brady is two years younger than Bratt and has scored 20 more goals in his career in 30 fewer games. Bratt 70 goals in 5 seasons (307 games) - Brady 90 goals in 4 season 277 games.
That is significant to me.
I'm so over Wood at this point because of that. And I don't even hate him as a player, but the one mistake that's on Fitz that he really should get some heat for is the fact that he even qualified the guy at all. He should have seen this coming.The Wood thing infuriates me because that 3m is the reason we don’t even have the cap space to give Bratt a large deal. Not saying it isn’t doable, but it would be problematic.
You can’t assume guys will stay on LTIR, capping out sucks and teams are simply not taking cap dumps this year. The market has changed, a bunch of teams have wingers they would love to move.
Patrick Laine is a little flaky it seems...So there are a whole bunch of peripheral issues there..But yeah I would love to have Laine's goal scoring in New Jersey...At the cost of Bratt? I'm not too sure. Would need a little more careful consideration on my part.so you'd take Patrik Laine over Bratt as well? Just checking.
I love Bratt and I love grit. The issue I have with the Devils lineup is the lack of "skilled grit" or whatever we want to call it, and I think it really hampers the makeup of this roster. I'm still smarting over the Habs taking Slafkovsky over Wright as that's the exact type of player this roster needs.And also, I don't think its a coincidence that the (few) people who said they would take B. Tkachuk over Bratt are probably older in age (given one of the guys brought up a Nets point guard from 1980)
Its fascinating to me tbh how much the older crowd loves their grit
I take the player that scores more goals over assist EVERY SINGLE time. Not really "grit" so much in this case...Brady is two years younger than Bratt and has scored 20 more goals in his career in 30 fewer games. Bratt 70 goals in 5 seasons (307 games) - Brady 90 goals in 4 season 277 games.
That is significant to me.
In my observations a skilled setup man is more dependent on a skilled goal scorer than the other way around.An assist in itself means a goal was scored right?
I’ll concede the durability point. There’s definitely precedent there.
Mostly because our medical team probably practices medieval medicine.
So you’re to blame!
More like the glue factory for everyone's favorite unicorn.
Its just such an absolutely lazy narrative to say "Player A has more goals than Player B, so he must be better!"