- May 8, 2010
- 21,720
- 38,288
Basically buying him out in June 2026 instead?If we’re going to have the dead cap I’d rather retain half. That’d be 2 years of 3 rather than 3.5 and 2.5 and then 2 1.5 years.
Basically buying him out in June 2026 instead?If we’re going to have the dead cap I’d rather retain half. That’d be 2 years of 3 rather than 3.5 and 2.5 and then 2 1.5 years.
All it takes is one team. Still can’t see anyone going to 9.5 over 8 but I could see someone do like 8x8
Seems like that was the plan from the start, same with Hamilton. I forget the exact numbers but I remember his buyout being pretty low for the last year of his deal. Feels like that's the likely way to go.
If Nemec doesn't get the service time this year, his contract will slide and that would be the first year his ELC is up. The only remaining big raises we might anticipate between now and then would be Luke, Mercer, and Holtz if he works out. We might be able to ride that out with the combined savings from the Schneider buyout, Koukkanen buyout, and Kovalchuk cap recapture falling off, cap raise, and attrition from the depth guys. If Nemec plays this year or we commit big money to anyone else in addition to Meier, that could all scramble a bunch. The Meier deal and what kind of deals our depth signs this summer will inform a lot of those decisions.
I'm thinking he mentioned Pitt and Wash as fits from the team perspective.so for a guy that claims he wants to win and its important to him hes going to sign a "long termish" contract with two teams that didn't make the playoffs last year and would be harder pressed to make them going further?
it depends if its a team that isn't contending but just wants to spend money and make a splash like say the yotes or the jackets then yeah sure they would throw stupid money at him. a true contender? chances are they don't have the trade capital or the cap space to fit him so goes to the player whats more important a huge payday non contender or a decent pay day with a contender?
He’d have to be taking like half or nearly half of what he could get for me to be into it. That’s a lot to ask. Only way I could see him being into it is if he wants to go to a contender and he’s willing to bet on himself so if he signs for like 4 years he’d still be worth a good deal when that’s up
Basically buying him out in June 2026 instead?
but thats what i mean no one really knows. everyone just throws out the blanket he wants the max term max money deal and yet somehow still wants to be on a contender. i dont really see that happening so there has to be a middle ground somewhere. i'd have no problem at all giving him a 3-5 year deal if he is down for it
Too early to consider a buyout.I think Palat’s injury really affected his season, I’m totally willing to give him a full off-season of rest to see what’s up. I’m pretty confident he can bounce back.
With that said, that contract can be bought out pretty easily I think? I’m no expert on buyouts but here’s CapFriendly’s buyout calculator results if we buyout Palat in June of 2025:
View attachment 720070
Oh I’m not considering it, I still believe in Palat and I think he can bounce back. I also put value in what he brings in the room.Too early to consider buyout.
A little surprised the analytics guys don't give him more props actually. xGF% was good this season. And before people say he was carried by Nico and Bratt, he was better away from those guys then with. Was really good with Boq and Haula.
Though not in the playoffs, he was at 70% xGF with Nico. Only around 50% with Hughes.
Wants to win and be closer to home. Translation: Columbusso for a guy that claims he wants to win and its important to him hes going to sign a "long termish" contract with two teams that didn't make the playoffs last year and would be harder pressed to make them going further?
Thank you, you made my point! The market the guy played in juiced his exposure. Thats fine too, just realize that majes a difference.Lundqvist was far and away the best goalie of his generation. He also does have a Vezina. He was a finalist 4 other times and one time Hart finalist. Using the “if he played in Columbus” argument is dumb. You can easily flip that as like “if he played in Pittsburgh” we’d literally be talking about this guy as if he’s in the Hasek, Marty, Roy echelon with all the Cups he would’ve won and combine the hard on GMs have for wins and the weight they have with Vezina voting with Lundqvist’s level of dominance and he would’ve won quite a few. Lundqvist’s a clear cut first ballot guy.
I think it's reasonable that Palat will be better this coming year than he was this past year. Maybe not by a ton, but he could be a 40+ point player. I don't expect him to be really good either though.
But his deal is exactly why I don't understand why someone like ROR is being talked about. He's in all likelihood going to get the same deal and he's the same age (and even older mileage wise) and he's also gonna get bonuses for things like his Conn Smythe and being a ''real winner'' and ''knowing how to win'' and dat leadership tho lol.
Wanting to win is a trope. Everyone wants to win. Nobody says they want to lose. It’s essentially meaningless. For these players it’s their job. My point on the contract was actually the take less deal to sign with NJ to try to play for a good team just entering its competitive window. If he signs with Pitt or Wash it’s because they are still coasting on reputation and those teams will give him 8 years in a sign and trade since they are both hoping for two or three more competitive years before the wheels fall off. I’d expect him to opt for thr 8 years rather than playing for thr more competitive team.so for a guy that claims he wants to win and its important to him hes going to sign a "long termish" contract with two teams that didn't make the playoffs last year and would be harder pressed to make them going further?
He was on a 38 point pace this year.I think it's reasonable that Palat will be better this coming year than he was this past year. Maybe not by a ton, but he could be a 40+ point player. I don't expect him to be really good either though.
But his deal is exactly why I don't understand why someone like ROR is being talked about. He's in all likelihood going to get the same deal and he's the same age (and even older mileage wise) and he's also gonna get bonuses for things like his Conn Smythe and being a ''real winner'' and ''knowing how to win'' and dat leadership tho lol.
Nice depth for the bottom pairing?
Nice depth for the bottom pairing?
We still getting Colton?
Nice depth for the bottom pairing?
Nice depth for the bottom pairing?