devilsblood
Registered User
- Mar 10, 2010
- 30,769
- 13,347
I feel that is only a light benefit. Will only be used in pinch.Has Casey ever played on the left side? That might help eventually.
I feel that is only a light benefit. Will only be used in pinch.Has Casey ever played on the left side? That might help eventually.
I am assuming Lazar is taking that final LW spot permanently?![]()
Maybe if Dougie slows down we look at moving him and Casey takes his spot if Casey develops into a suitable replacement . Or maybe we trade Casey to fill a more important hole ?Curious to see where Seamus Casey fits in the management’s plans.
There’s certainly a clog on the right side right now and he’s a few years away, but he’s a very good player. He has NJD ties, so I’m not too worried he’ll look elsewhere, just wondering what the plan is with him.
The thing with Marty is that even though he had a good defense in front of him for a big part of his career, he never had that big of a firepower offense either from what I recall. His margin for error was very small.Dat system though
That was always the big one.
People were comparing it to the MLB wins record when he was approaching it.
Nobody will ever break his 125.
I mean, Bahl is very likely to have Nemec as his partner on the third pairing, if not this year than next year. It would not at all be shocking if Nemec is significantly better than Severson.It's much easier to do this sort of thing a few years ago when the Devils were way below the salary cap and so making low-risk bets on a young D wouldn't jeopardize anyone better, but we're no longer in that position. The Devils basically have already spent the upcoming cap increase on everything else - it's going to go to Mercer, Luke, and paying a goalie more money - that means minimizing a guy like Bahl's salary as much as possible, and hopefully replacing him with a player of similar cost when he gets too expensive.
We haven't seen much of Bahl away from Severson, by far the best partner he's likely to ever have on a third pairing. I like what I saw out of him last season but I'd be surprised if the Devils saw enough to commit to him.
The thing with Marty is that even though he had a good defense in front of him for a big part of his career, he never had that big of a firepower offense either from what I recall. His margin for error was very small.
Interesting little poll here!
I don't think his wins will be broken either, but it could be in a verrryyyyyy long time from now.Especially not with the steps the league has taken in the last decade or so to juice scoring. Getting a shutout is a much more difficult task than it used to be, even if you play behind a good defensive team.
You can never say that any record is totally unbreakable, but for hockey that might be the closest thing to it.
Very good point.The thing with Marty was that he was basically an elite puck moving D man back there and killed plays far before they could ever develop. That was his greatness. He was a big part, if not the biggest part, of why he faced relatively few shots.
That was always the big one.
People were comparing it to the MLB wins record when he was approaching it.
Nobody will ever break his 125.
I don't think his wins will be broken either, but it could be in a verrryyyyyy long time from now.
It will be a little bit easier now with the shootout. I think Marty himself had 40-something career shootout wins.
I never thought Fleury would pass Roy for second overall, but Fleury probably has like 70-something (just taking a shot in the dark with that number) shootout wins. Roy had zero, the shootout didn't exist yet.
I don't think it will happen in the near future.you just proved in your own statement why the record will fall and it will be a lot sooner then you think. MAF isn't super close but it wasn't very far away either. with no labor stoppages the record will def fall to someone in the near future.
There are less work horses each year, it's a tough one to break. You need to average 70+ games and with analytics, old goaltenders that are bad won't keep playing based on reputation.you just proved in your own statement why the record will fall and it will be a lot sooner then you think. MAF isn't super close but it wasn't very far away either. with no labor stoppages the record will def fall to someone in the near future.
I mean, Bahl is very likely to have Nemec as his partner on the third pairing, if not this year than next year. It would not at all be shocking if Nemec is significantly better than Severson.
I'm still disappointed Brodeur didn't get 700 wins with NJ. I'd have settled for him getting to 699 with StL and coming back for one more kick at the can with the understanding he retires after win 700 and they'd only start him at home games.I don't think it will happen in the near future.
MAF is still like over 150-some odd wins away and is 38 years old.
He didn't look like he had much gas left last year and is pretty washed up himself. Not Quick level washed up. I don't think anyone has been since maybe Barrasso or Vernon in the early 00's. But still fairly washed up in his own right.
I do remember a stat back in the 2011-2012 season that then-27 year old Fleury had almost as many wins as Brodeur had when he was 27. Fleury seems like he could pass Roy soon, depending how long it takes him to get another 10 or 12 wins or whatever it is. He turns 39 in November.
Brodeur passed Roy in March of 2009, just before he turned 37 years old. Brodeur hadn't yet missed that entire year lockout when he was 27 years old. MAF would wind up missing roughly half a season's worth of lockout in his 28 year old season.
I’m not saying fluery is going to break it but if he can be 150 wins away and still playing. All it will take is a goalie who’s a little better than him and little healthier and he will be close. Fluery is “this close” and he’s played like 300 fewer games which I think is pretty impressive. Considering players are more inclined to go ufa I can see a goalie in the future jumping ship from a contender to contender and always be on a good teamI don't think it will happen in the near future.
MAF is still like over 150-some odd wins away and is 38 years old.
He didn't look like he had much gas left last year and is pretty washed up himself. Not Quick level washed up. I don't think anyone has been since maybe Barrasso or Vernon in the early 00's. But still fairly washed up in his own right.
I do remember a stat back in the 2011-2012 season that then-27 year old Fleury had almost as many wins as Brodeur had when he was 27. Fleury seems like he could pass Roy soon, depending how long it takes him to get another 10 or 12 wins or whatever it is. He turns 39 in November.
Brodeur passed Roy in March of 2009, just before he turned 37 years old. Brodeur hadn't yet missed that entire year lockout when he was 27 years old. MAF would wind up missing roughly half a season's worth of lockout in his 28 year old season.
That would have been a sideshow circus act IMO.I'm still disappointed Brodeur didn't get 700 wins with NJ. I'd have settled for him getting to 699 with StL and coming back for one more kick at the can with the understanding he retires after win 700 and they'd only start him at home games.