It's not only funny that Vitek and Schmid's numbers are so close this year their drop from last year is almost identical too.
Vitek .911 to .890 -.021
Akira .922 to .893. -.029
Probably rebound control...
Maybe McKenzie stole all their rebound control because he bucks the trend
and see his SV% increase by .006. Hardly different but higher than he had the previous 3 years here. Go figure.
Interesting hypothesis. If only we could see how Schmid is doing in another league and compare his stats to other goalies on that roster or his own AHL stats from previous seasons.
I love the guy but it’s obvious he hasn’t been good. Anyone with a pair of eyeballs can see the obscene amount of poor rebounds he spits out. And those long range wrist shots that go under the glove have been backbreakers all season when they are routine shots.
I love the guy but it’s obvious he hasn’t been good. Anyone with a pair of eyeballs can see the obscene amount of poor rebounds he spits out. And those long range wrist shots that go under the glove have been backbreakers all season when they are routine shots.
Interesting hypothesis. If only we could see how Schmid is doing in another league and compare his stats to other goalies on that roster or his own AHL stats from previous seasons.
AHL is more complicated to compare players on the same roster ... The goalie getting the 3rd game of 3 game in 4 nights with B team bottom 6 and extra D didn't have the same team in front of him as the first goalie.
It's not like the NHL where if healthy the same 6 Dmen and same 12 forwards play every game (mostly). They rotate guys in an out all the time
You go into the 3rd down 3-1, 4-1, or down by two in any combination....you have already lost that game statistically. But we almost always finish the game getting a little closer. Those are absolutely meaningless goals..and we do it all the time.
Holy smokes....I didn't realize we scored that many meaningless goals....I get 14 meaningless goals ...those are goals scored when the contest is not in question
vs FLA 3-4 Oct 16. =3 meaningless
Entered 3rd: 0-3
Scored x3
1-4 (3:35)
2-4 (8:51)
3-4 (17:37)
vs WSH 2-4 Nov 10
Entered 3rd: 0-3. = 2 meaningless
Scored x2
1-3 (7:13)
2-3 (9:12)
Holy smokes....I didn't realize we scored that many meaningless goals....I get 14 meaningless goals ...those are goals scored when the contest is not in question
vs FLA 3-4 Oct 16. =3 meaningless
Entered 3rd: 0-3
Scored x3
1-4 (3:35)
2-4 (8:51)
3-4 (17:37)
vs WSH 2-4 Nov 10
Entered 3rd: 0-3. = 2 meaningless
Scored x2
1-3 (7:13)
2-3 (9:12)
Actually looking at moneypuck and I've given Schmid a bit too much credit. His stats are stinky too, just less stinky then Vitek.
But Vitek Goals Saved Above Expected is -11.1 which is 4th worst in the league for goalies with over 10 games. Schmid is -3.9 which is still really bad but and Daws currently sits at a +4.3.
Do that per 60, Vitek is 10th worst in the league at -.372. Schmid 12th worst at -.310 and Daws is 12th best in the league at +.382
AHL is more complicated to compare players on the same roster ... The goalie getting the 3rd game of 3 game in 4 nights with B team bottom 6 and extra D didn't have the same team in front of him as the first goalie.
It's not like the NHL where if healthy the same 6 Dmen and same 12 forwards play every game (mostly). They rotate guys in an out all the time
Right, so we can’t see his .885 and conclude maybe he’s just not playing well this year. If he was playing really well down there you definitely wouldn’t use that as evidence for your “argument” or whatever you could even call this.
Right, so we can’t see his .885 and conclude maybe he’s just not playing well this year. If he was playing really well down there you definitely wouldn’t use that as evidence for your “argument” or whatever you could even call this.
He may not be playing well and he may be playing worse this year
But all I'm saying is those minutes between the AHL goaltenders on the same team may not be all that equal as they could've played with vastly different players in front of them
Actually looking at moneypuck and I've given Schmid a bit too much credit. His stats are stinky too, just less stinky then Vitek.
But Vitek Goals Saved Above Expected is -11.1 which is 4th worst in the league for goalies with over 10 games. Schmid is -3.9 which is still really bad but and Daws currently sits at a +4.3.
Do that per 60, Vitek is 10th worst in the league at -.372. Schmid 12th worst at -.310 and Daws is 12th best in the league at +.382
You actually said this to me once before either last year or two years ago and I got you all the teams that have only have 1 or 2 losses when leading after two. Not by multiple goals either . Just leading.
I gave you an article from 2017 or 2018 where Pittsburgh had gone like 3 years without losing a game when leading after two. Not by by multiple goals, just leading after two.
I am sure Vancouver hasn't lost this season when leading after two. It's more than "rare" to win when down by 3 going into the 3rd it's freaking impossible. If it happens to non-bottom feeders more than 10 times a year I'd be shocked
Sorry to interrupt our regularly scheduled "Devils Win, Let's argue" discussion but I just found this tagged on Bratt's instagram during Allstar weekend.
He still thinks of Zacha.
"You guys like Pavel Zacha? In Boston? Good player."
You actually said this to me once before either last year or two years ago and I got you all the teams that have only have 1 or 2 losses when leading after two. Not by multiple goals either . Just leading.
I gave you an article from 2017 or 2018 where Pittsburgh had gone like 3 years without losing a game when leading after two. Not by by multiple goals, just leading after two.
I am sure Vancouver hasn't lost this season when leading after two. It's more than "rare" to win when down by 3 going into the 3rd it's freaking impossible. If it happens to non-bottom feeders more than 10 times a year I'd be shocked
They're not from down 2 or 3 goals going into 3rd comebacks
I don’t even know what the point of this debate is, nor do I really care, I only jumped in because you kept referring to all the “meaningless goals” without having any facts.
That bugged me.
If you want to keep thinking all 16 are meaningless, and that 16 is a lot, knock yourself out.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.