Triumph
Registered User
- Oct 2, 2007
- 13,899
- 14,665
Wood effectively has no leverage, but I also don't blame him for trying - his style of play could very well lead to a short career.
A 1:27 is huge difference...Ondrej Kase scored 20 goals, 19 at even strength, averaged 1:27 more than Wood and just signed a 3 year deal at 2.6 million per year.
There is no player in our system, perhaps in our division that can replace Wood's combination of size and speed. Let alone goals.
Do you seriously not see how the bolded portion makes zero sense and is nonsensical? You are essentially saying you proved it, now prove it again ..but without compensation.We know.
It wasn’t too long ago that your favorite punchline for Wood was how few years he was/is removed from prep school hockey. Shero sees the same thing. Wood had a great season — awesome, now prove it.
Regardless of how productive a season he had last year, and how unique his skill set is, Wood has no leverage here. And letting this drag through camp (and now, the preseason) is a very bad situation for the player.
Yeah but the no leverage thing is a bit shortsighted... it's momentary...if the estimation is he's not worth the commitment perhaps you hammer him because there is no real consequence...but if you believe he is a valuable asset you either pay now or pay later...and paying later risks poisoning the well in any future negotiations. It's dumb when you can sign him to a fair contract now imoIf a GM is bridging a player, they have to hammer them as hard as is reasonably possible - every RFA negotiation affects future ones. Shero isn't just dealing with Wood here - he is dealing with Hischier and Bratt and Zacha and Butcher and anyone else who might be RFA without arbitration rights.
Do you seriously not see how the bolded portion makes zero sense and is nonsensical? You are essentially saying you proved it, now prove it again ..but without compensation.
Yeah but the no leverage thing is a bit shortsighted... it's momentary...if the estimation is he's not worth the commitment perhaps you hammer him because there is no real consequence...but if you believe he is a valuable asset you either pay now or pay later...and paying later risks poisoning the well in any future negotiations. It's dumb when you can sign him to a fair contract now imo
Yeah, they all left when they had the opportunity to. We say Shero has all the leverage, but a player who hates your guts when the process is all said and done, whenever the hell that's gonna be, is bad in the long-term. There's a chance this is going to blow up in Ray's face, whether it be through trading Wood as part of a bad package or any of the up-and-comers being unable to fill his shoes.Remember when Niedermayer, Holik, Gomez had no leverage?
Those are dumb/bad UFA happy drunk July 1st signings...having absolutely nothing to do with signing your own 23 year old RFA to his first contract.Do you really not know the function of a prove-it contract? I’m not inventing anything new here.
Wood showed he can put together a very good season in the NHL. Buying high off a single season’s performance is how you get Clarkson and Leino disasters...
If they could sign him to a “fair contract now,” it would already be done.
Wood’s camp is likely giving the same lines you are. Considering we’re a team rich with young talent that will be signing similar deals in the near future, I don’t blame Shero one bit for taking the prudent, conservative approach here. Precedent must be shrewdly set.
Maybe BADDOCK is this year's Bratt!!!
He benefits when the team isn't as good without him and Shero has to pay through the nose to keep him because his macho brinkmanship failed. Small chance, sure, but don't leave anything to chance. Give him a damn contract. This team is better with Miles Wood. That is a fact.I don't see how Wood benefits from anything that's going on right now.
I bet they aren't offering 2+ million per. My guess is they are looking to give him a Tanner Pearson 1.4 per for two years bridge...and Wood is absolutely right not to accept it.They're obviously not going to get him at a 6 years 3 mil per deal. He should just sign the 2 years and what I'm guessing 4-4.5 mil total and get to work. In two years if he's still developing and getting better, pay him more and longer. I don't see how Wood benefits from anything that's going on right now.
All the indications from reporters say that money's not the issue here, term is.is the team better 3 years from now when the gm is put in a corner by every rfa that thinks they deserve more money? none of you have any idea what wood is actually asking for
All the indications from reporters say that money's not the issue here, term is.
I seem to be getting dyslexic as I get older.Uh no. Multiple reporters have said they agree on term, but not how much money.
is the team better 3 years from now when the gm is put in a corner by every rfa that thinks they deserve more money? none of you have any idea what wood is actually asking for