What I find amusing is that over the past couple of years, pretty much everything I have read has said that at this point in their development, David Broll is the better player over Tyler Biggs.
Same height, similar weight, same age, same draft year. The offensive production between the two isn't even that far off, and Broll has never been used as an offensive weapon.
I honestly do hope Biggs pans out, but I can't believe the fan following he has here. There has been virtually nothing to be excited about, and if you listen to Biggs interviews -- even he doesn't seem to envision himself as an offensive contributor.
I like him, I hope for the best, etc...but I don't even see him in our top 10 prospects at this point.
This is how I see it:
Morgan Reilly
Matt Finn
Joe Colborne
Fredrik Gauthier
Stuart Percy
Petter Granberg
Josh Leivo
Jerry D'Amigo
Carter Ashton
Greg McKegg
At this point in time, if Biggs wasn't a first round pick it wouldn't surprise me if our management assigned him to the ECHL, as that is probably where he's more suited to at this point in time.
Considering there are a lot of stat watchers on here, who use stats as their main tool, I'm surprised about all of the hype around Biggs, because his stats are not great. On a similar note, so many people are giving up on Carter Ashton, for instance, when if you read actual reports...while the points weren't there, he apparently looked great last year in the AHL. Same with D'Amigo, obviously. And Dallas Eakins teams were never known for high offensive totals from any of the star players.