you might want to take a look at what he accomplished in tbay before you determine you know better than him about building an nhl team ?tfw too smart to sign excellent/very good players to good/great contracts and make the playoffs instead of drafting just a couple spots earlier
Someone asked the question how the thread had reached 48 pages.How is this thread 54 pages?
Because they traded Dionne. What the hell were they thinking?How is this thread 54 pages?
Cause every time the wings lose (and we lose a lot bc we suck) 5 different people enter the thread and insist it is evidence the rebuild is cooked, and each time, stupid wings fans (including me) keep taking the baitHow is this thread 54 pages?
at no point in bergerons pre-draft career did he display significantly more offensive upside than Danielson. Danielson scored at an identical pace in his draft year in juniors
I won’t argue that Bergeron had very good offensive creativity. I agree. But Your assessment of Danielson is , as with 99% of the posters in this thread, laughably misinformed, yet you discuss it with such conviction.
Who have been the signings that would haveAh the old false dichotomy where if you can't make the best signings in the world, the only alternative is to make terrible ones.
Super logic.
Sounds like you’ve never watched danielson. His passing is easily his best trait, by far. His shot is decent but not amazing, but he would be the 2nd best passer in Detroit today. Based purely on that trait he has 1st line upside when taking his very very good defensive play into accountPre-draft sure, though it's not unusual for players that are among the youngest in their cohort to be late-bloomers (Danielson, by comparison, was a late-birthday). By the time he was Danielson's current age, Bergeron had made the NHL at 18 (on a playoff team), been top-10 in Calder voting, been the MVP of what might have been Canada's best ever WJC team, and was starting a season where he would lead his NHL team in scoring. There's no comparison.
Then feel free to enlighten me. Because when I see Danielson, I see a smart, responsible center, with good skating and puckhandling, but average-sized and not much of a goal-scoring threat. That doesn't really add up to having NHL 1st-line upside.
A) Has nothing to do with what I said, since I never alleged that there were. What I said was that there weren't only 2 choices in the world: Sign MacKinnon and McDavid or sign Copp and Compher. Do you agree with that statement? Because that's what I was responding to, and my response didn't mention the playoffs.Who have been the signings that would have
A) put them in the post season
B) you know had any interest in coming to the Wings?
This isn’t EA sports when you can just pick any player you want and sign them…
I mean one team is 28th and rebuilding, the other is officially out of their rebuild and hovering along that 27th-31st.... lol . I would consider the latter a fail. All three are boring to watch. Nothing fun about losing!
Detroit top 4 or 5 prospect pool in the NHL
...Ranking every NHL team’s 2024-25 prospect pool, from 1-32
Which teams improved? Which clubs fell? Breaking down how all 32 NHL pipelines stack up against each other.www.dailyfaceoff.com
Ottawa way down at 31st.
The NHL’s Best Farm Systems Ranked - 2024-25 Midseason Update - The Hockey Writers Latest News, Analysis & More
Just like the NHL clubs, their prospect pools are all at different stages. This piece will take a look at every NHL farm system ranking.thehockeywriters.com
/*checks standings*/ -Whoops!
I really do appreciate your opinion tho-
You know players have a million reasons as to why they would or would not chose a spot, right?A) Has nothing to do with what I said, since I never alleged that there were. What I said was that there weren't only 2 choices in the world: Sign MacKinnon and McDavid or sign Copp and Compher. Do you agree with that statement? Because that's what I was responding to, and my response didn't mention the playoffs.
B) Why wouldn't people want to sign on with the Yzerplan that's going so well. I mean, they've improved every year under him and have a top 5 prospect pool. Why are you hating on the Detroit Red Wings so much?
Sounds like you’ve never watched danielson. His passing is easily his best trait, by far. His shot is decent but not amazing, but he would be the 2nd best passer in Detroit today. Based purely on that trait he has 1st line upside when taking his very very good defensive play into account
If this thread was about the penguins you'd have a great point.With Dubas at the helm I'm certain Pens fans will never feel the burden of a lengthy rebuild once Crosby/Malkin/Letang hang'em up
And all the blame is solely due to the randomness of the draft. Otherwise the FO is flawless.5 game losing streak
6 wins in the last 20 games
No trades, no coaches fired, nobody waived, nobody called up
Go wings go baby! What a team we have!
The unintentional tank might be the best thing for them this season. Adding Hagens, Martone, or Misa all of a sudden makes the group of young forwards look respectable.5 game losing streak
6 wins in the last 20 games
No trades, no coaches fired, nobody waived, nobody called up
Go wings go baby! What a team we have!
'' yzermans playing for all the marbles as in attempting to build a dynasty''Wings fans are living in another reality lol. Talking about building a dynasty as they sit in 28th place coming up on 9 consecutive years out of the playoffs.
Those rankings are always flawed
Detroit doesn’t have a single franchise forward in their roster, how many legit elite A tier forward prospects do they have?
They are building an average team, depth valued more than high end skill, and why they are ranked so high on these lists
ive another version of delusional = joe smo hockey fans thinking they know more about running an nhl club than steve yzerman = lmaoYeah because we definitely all said this. Maybe respond to who you're quoting instead of grouping in thousands of people with a handful of delusional fans in this thread
Sorry to break it to you but that top list at the time of December 2018 (and you missed Hronek) isn't really much worse than your bottom list of today. That's how prospects work, they look amazing and full of promise 2-3 years after being drafted. But 4-6 years later you get heavy attrition as many fail to make the jump to regular NHL players, let alone impact ones.
For example just trying to dig up a team ranking list of 2018, found this one and here's Detroit's write up:
Then feel free to enlighten me. Because when I see Danielson, I see a smart, responsible center, with good skating and puckhandling, but average-sized and not much of a goal-scoring threat. That doesn't really add up to having NHL 1st-line upside.