Swedish Gretzky
Registered User
I kind of want to say he's a meaner, smaller Morgan Rielly, sort of Mark Giordano-like in the way he likes exploding into bodies.
I think he can be a solid 6th D-man on the L side for us.
I kind of want to say he's a meaner, smaller Morgan Rielly, sort of Mark Giordano-like in the way he likes exploding into bodies.
None of the stats favor Polak, the eye test doesn't favor him, and despite being a PK'er, he takes a lot of stupid penalties. IDGAF if he's a "good grunt", he's a downright liability that needs to not play on the Leafs ever again.But he's a point generating monster!!!
I don't think we will ever agree on polak. I don't think he is a skill player but he's a good grunt.
Next year if the Ozhiganov stories are true and Ozhiganov transitions well you may never have to endure another shift from him.
I think a lot of bias goes into some views on him. Is he flawed? Yes. Is he a top 4? No. Is he a good bottom pairing NHL defenseman? Yes imoNone of the stats favor Polak, the eye test doesn't favor him, and despite being a PK'er, he takes a lot of stupid penalties. IDGAF if he's a "good grunt", he's a downright liability that needs to not play on the Leafs ever again.
But he's a point generating monster!!!
I don't think we will ever agree on polak. I don't think he is a skill player but he's a good grunt.
Next year if the Ozhiganov stories are true and Ozhiganov transitions well you may never have to endure another shift from him.
Maybe he get 2 points tonight to counter?Good grunts don't take penalties at that rate when there on the team for there PK ability
I see he's already taken his penalty for today, do you think he may shoot for two penalties just to change it up?
Maybe he get 2 points tonight to counter?
I think a lot of bias goes into some views on him. Is he flawed? Yes. Is he a top 4? No. Is he a good bottom pairing NHL defenseman? Yes imo
Happy no but I'm not going to crucify him for itSo your happy our PK specialist is taking penalties at that rate because he's got a point?
Are you talking about Dermott?He might be sheltered but he looks the part of a top 4, 1.75 periods into his NHL career IMO. He looks very poised and confident out there with the puck on his stick, in scrums, closing gaps. I don't think it's coming from a point of optimism but he sees and reads pressure very well, and clearly has refined that area of his game better than what we have right now (again, in this small sample size)- especially if we're comparing him to what we have right now in our bottom pairing. This opinion is subject to change with a greater sample.
Happy no but I'm not going to crucify him for it
What gives me confidence is that he is playing the same game he's played with the Marlies, so I strongly believe it's sustainable.Woops my mistake, yes I was
I'm sure he will. Babs is loving how Dermott wins all these board battles.He needs to sort that **** out, I wouldn't mind Dermott getting eased into some PK minutes when Zaitsev comes back and Polak goes out (he better go out)
I'm sure he will. Babs is loving how Dermott wins all these board battles.
Maybe we don't need to trade Marner/Nylander for D after all?!?!Dermott has looked really good so far.
Lots of confidence and he is playing well having fun.
What gives me confidence is that he is playing the same game he's played with the Marlies, so I strongly believe it's sustainable.
I remember jumping for joy when we drafted him. I would tune into Erie games to catch mcdavid but always needed up impresses with Travis.
Time will tell but I think we have a winner here
I would seriously like to. Not sure how you would go about doing it though.I'm still waiting for someone to post league average numbers for a #6 defenseman
Ya I have less that zero clue about that. I just wondered because people were mentioning Gudbranson and imo polak is better than him.He plays with composure, smarts and a bit of a snarl. Combine that with his IQ and foot speed, that can take you a long way.