Sorinth
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2013
- 11,597
- 6,240
Well that's not really true, Hoffman is arguably a 20 goal scorer but 3m would still probably be an overpayment for him. That said if Gurianov can be a 20 goal scorer then 3m is perfectly reasonable for him. The main issue is that no matter how he does for the rest of the season we can't be confidant that he is a 20 goal scorer. And paying 3m for someone who is maybe a 20 goal scorer but also maybe an AHL/NHL tweener is a big risk.We are a team trying to build a talented roster for the future. Paying a 20 goal scorer $3M is not overpaying. Trying to figure out if he is a 20 goal scorer is the tricky part.
But I would be willing to sign his QO if he finished strong. We are short of talent, takig a shot at someone is a reasonable gamble.
A better contract might be 3 years at $2.33 per year. Always assuming he is pacing 20+ goals with us and his play also passes the eye test.
If he finishes strong I think ideally we work out a deal unrelated to his QO. And although his QO provides him some leverage, if we did let him go I'm not sure he gets anywhere close to 3m as a UFA. So it makes sense from his POV to sign something closer to his UFA value, since to maximize his career earnings he needs to ensure he's on a team that is a good fit for him next season, and the UFA route is risky in that regard. Arbitration would make more sense financially for us then giving him his QO, but there's the human/relationship side to going through that process so it maybe worth just taking the hit and paying him the QO in order to build a better relationship.
In the end I expect him to sign for less then his QO, but I won't be mad if it does end up being his QO. A multi-year deal at around his QO price is risky, at 2.33 as you suggest is definitely more palatable but I'm not sure it makes the most sense from Gurianov's perspective.