Jaynki
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2014
- 5,870
- 6,049
What is probably going to happen is he will be transferred to the AHL once the current NL season is over (5 more games?), then NHL next year.
We will see. He might pull a Struble too.
What is probably going to happen is he will be transferred to the AHL once the current NL season is over (5 more games?), then NHL next year.
After what has happened with Slaf, I am willing to trust the process. None of us on here, would fully realize what Reinbacher can truly bring....Is it right that Nashville was ready to trade Askarov + ??? to the Habs for pick #5 ?
Or that Philly was willing to trade Cutter Gauthier + ??? for that same #5
If so: Huges was totaly dumb to refuse any of these two trades.... OR... Reinbacher is something really, really special like Slaf.
Reinbacher is loaned to Kloten, Habs can recall him and assign to the AHL/Habs if they want, he doesn't have to play the relegation rounds.His team gonna have to play in relegation round, so more than 5 games.
Is it right that Nashville was ready to trade Askarov + ??? to the Habs for pick #5 ?
Or that Philly was willing to trade Cutter Gauthier + ??? for that same #5
If so: Huges was totaly dumb to refuse any of these two trades.... OR... Reinbacher is something really, really special like Slaf.
Reinbacher is loaned to Kloten, Habs can recall him and assign to the AHL/Habs if they want, he doesn't have to play the relegation rounds.
Agreed. And it would be a dick move to leave his team in a tough situation all for... Coming a week earlier to NA.He doesn't but if they were gonna pull him, they probably would have done it when the changed coaches the 3rd time. Think they'll want him to have the experience of playing in the relegation round as it still is a play-offs of sort and good experience.
How ever it goes, another famous Austrian, Herr Schwarzenegger has some sage advice, GET THE HELL OUT OF HERE. lolReinbacher is loaned to Kloten, Habs can recall him and assign to the AHL/Habs if they want, he doesn't have to play the relegation rounds.
How ever it goes, another famous Austrian, Herr Schwarzenegger has some sage advice, GET THE HELL OUT OF HERE. lol
I don't think people are excited enough about landing Catton. He's 100% gonna be available when they pick and I like him better than Smith who everyone here was praying would fall to 5th last year. I see him as a 90+ point player at his peak and ppg in his prime.
sadly that never happenedWe wanted Smith to fall, because we knew Kent would pass on Michkov.
There's actually pretty good reason to believe that Gauthier was offered for 5th overall. Not that it would have been the right moveTrading the 5 OA pick for Askarov would be criminally stupid.....this is why Askarov is still with Nashville as no team with a top ten pick was interested in trading for a G prospect with such a high pick. There is no reason to believe that Gauthier was offered to Hughes either.
The kid is a competitor and will play for his team until the end to help them. Plenty of time to come to NA after.Agreed. And it would be a dick move to leave his team in a tough situation all for... Coming a week earlier to NA.
There's actually pretty good reason to believe that Gauthier was offered for 5th overall. Not that it would have been the right move
There's more doubt about whether Gauthier would have signed with us or if it was straight up, but there are definitely reasons to believe it was offered
LOLNo, they said he was the best RHD in the draft. Hughes was pretty clear about that. And it might be a great pick . . . only time will tell.
There's actually pretty good reason to believe that Gauthier was offered for 5th overall. Not that it would have been the right move
There's more doubt about whether Gauthier would have signed with us or if it was straight up, but there are definitely reasons to believe it was offered
If you want to believe that they drafted the player they considered BPA, without any regard to the position that he plays, who am I to stop you? Given that Hughes intimidated that they might not have taken him if he was a LD, as opposed to a RD, that suggests that they didn’t necessarily consider him BPA, but you don’t have to draft BPA, it’s not a rule. Thinking he’s the best available RD doesn’t mean that viewed him as BPA, maybe just the best pick for their needs, which is fine by me. And if helps team win the Cup one day, nobody will care that they passed on MM.LOL
And they considered the best RHD in the draft to be the best available player in the draft, the fact that you read that as passing on players that they believed to be better says a lot about your argument.
The reading comprehension on this board is abysmal as so many people can only see their bias and fail to comprehend the actual meaning of the text.
I do admire your sense of irony,, I’ll give you that much. If you want to believe that they drafted the player they considered BPA, without any regard to the position that he plays, whom am I to stop you?
If you’re BPA, then you’re BPA, regardless of what position you play. Saying that they might not have drafted him if he was a LD suggests that they they didn’t consider BPA as their top criteria when making the pick. Regardless of how pompous of an a-hole you are, which you clearly are, your continued ignoring of what Hughes acknowledged at the draft because you want to believe that they care that much about BPA is laughable.Once again you are entirely missing the point and it is both sad and painful to see someone struggle so much.
Them stating that he was the best RHD in the draft has absolutely no relation to to them admitting that he was not the BPA. If you can not grasp that then perhaps I am not a person that you should consider engaging in conversation with.
If you’re BPA, then you’re BPA, regardless of what position you play. Saying that they might not have drafted him if he was a LD suggests that they they didn’t consider BPA as their top criteria when making the pick. Regardless of how pompous of an a-hole you are, which you clearly are, your continued ignoring of what Hughes acknowledged at the draft because you want to believe that they care that much about BPA is laughable.
Actually, Hughes saying that if he was a LD they may have passed on him suggest that he was the BPA. If that BPA been a LD they may have passed, but since he wasn’t a LD, they picked him.If you’re BPA, then you’re BPA, regardless of what position you play. Saying that they might not have drafted him if he was a LD suggests that they they didn’t consider BPA as their top criteria when making the pick. Regardless of how pompous of an a-hole you are, which you clearly are, your continued ignoring of what Hughes acknowledged at the draft because you want to believe that they care that much about BPA is laughable.
Actually, Hughes saying that if he was a LD they may have passed on him suggest that he was the BPA. If that BPA been a LD they may have passed, but since he wasn’t a LD, they picked him.
Excited to see him suit up with us a bit at the end of this season.