Prospect Info: David Reinbacher

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shawnathon

Registered User
Jul 25, 2012
563
345
True.

According to our standards tho Buffalo is rushing him and on the verge of killing his career.
I’m guessing this post has to do with Slafkovsky? If Benson can maintain a 40 point pace he’s ready for the NHL and would meet our standards. Slafkovsky is pacing for half of that. That does not meet a lot of standards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nona Di Giuseppe

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,508
106,819
Halifax
I’m guessing this post has to do with Slafkovsky? If Benson can maintain a 40 point pace he’s ready for the NHL and would meet our standards. Slafkovsky is pacing for half of that. That does not meet a lot of standards.

Yet we can see the growth in his game and he's starting to earn points lately in addition to the growth of his game.

Does that not matter?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417 and SlafySZN

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,870
6,049
I’m guessing this post has to do with Slafkovsky? If Benson can maintain a 40 point pace he’s ready for the NHL and would meet our standards. Slafkovsky is pacing for half of that. That does not meet a lot of standards.

Slaf was pacing for that after his 8 first game and he had a goal.

There just so much more to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417

Shawnathon

Registered User
Jul 25, 2012
563
345
Yet we can see the growth in his game and he's starting to earn points lately in addition to the growth of his game.

Does that not matter?
If he can manage to stop going in 10-15 game slumps.

Slaf was pacing for that after his 8 first game and he had a goal.

There just so much more to it.
Yeah I know points and scoring don’t matter with Slaf. They just a bonus when they happen.
 

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
13,477
26,742
Montréal
Seeing this thread bumped to the top, I assumed I was gonna get some sweet Reinbacher updates or even highlights

Oh mama I was wrong

This thread has gotten so out of hand that even Montreal is swearing, Jesus Christ guys

I hope we never get a top pick again cuz this is just too much holy f***
I get what you're saying but the team has been dog meat for 30 years.

So i can't get behind the opinion that habs fans don't deserve nice things when we've been watching a bottom 5 NHL product during the entire 21st century.

Saying I hope we never get a top pick again is ridiculous especially when its MANAGEMENT and OWNERSHIP making decisions not the freaking fans who pay 200$ a ticket to watch Davey Deharnais be 1C for 5 years and ice the worst top 6 in the league year after year after year after year after year.

God forbid we are critical on a message board about our dysfunctional franchise riding on the pines of ancient history.
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,348
25,744
I can't believe we gotta go through all this SHIT again my god lol

Evaluating who we chose at 1st OA and 5th OA is probably evaluating management's two most important decisions so far in the rebuild.

But that evaluation shouldn't be done in the threads about the players. Do the mods agree? Should those missions be in the Bobrov/Lapointe thread?
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,508
106,819
Halifax
Evaluating who we chose at 1st OA and 5th OA is probably evaluating management's two most important decisions so far in the rebuild.

But that evaluation shouldn't be done in the threads about the players. Do the mods agree? Should those missions be in the Bobrov/Lapointe thread?

Those evaluations shouldn't be done this early either..

Byfield is just starting to find his game in the NHL.. last year you could crucify the Kings for the selection, now, not nearly as much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paddyjack and 417

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,348
25,744
Those evaluations shouldn't be done this early either..

Byfield is just starting to find his game in the NHL.. last year you could crucify the Kings for the selection, now, not nearly as much.

Absolutely. But if people want to make them I don'tt think they can be stopped from making them. They can be criticized for making them. But imo discussions of who we should have picked and when it's too early to evaluate should be in the head scout or managmebt threads, not the threads about the players selected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,463
30,320
Ottawa
This is what you said, what started it all

"They've also taken things slowly with many and it blew up in their face too". You can't dissociate the "taken things slowly" part from the "blew up in their face too" part.

Ahh...see this is what actually started it all, because I was responding to a comment that said;;

"Doesn't mean taking things slowly is the wrong approach but when you have rushed so many and every time it blows up in your face, the math says try something different."

You can find that comment here:


So what you're telling me is that I can't associate taking things slowly and it blowing up in their faces, but the opposite can be true?

How does that work?
Because, It's a weird statement, the part that says it "blew up" in their face. It sort of looks like you're implying that taking it slow was a cause ? It's hard to know, because you never really elaborate what you mean by it, other than as a counterpoint.
How is it a weird statement if YOU believe the opposite is true?

For the record, I don't ACTUALLY believe that the players I listed didn't end up being NHL players because the team took things slowly with them. That would be a silly argument to make.

But maybe now you can understand WHY i said it, because I keep being told and keep reading that the opposite (rushing them), is what ruins players.

You can't believe one thing (that rushing players ruins them), and simultaneously dismiss the other (that taking things slowly can ruin them).

It's paradoxical lol

If you believe entire careers can be ruined because of the single act of rushing players, then you must believe the opposite is also true, that the single act of taking it slow, can also ruin them.
So, I'm still trying to understand from your list what point you're trying to make. Is anyone arguing that every player is going to make it ? Are you arguing that taking it slow actively harmed them ? If not, then this is just some random list without any meaning or context. I know you mentioned that no one ever points to spending too much time in the AHL as a detriment, but it's the sort of point that someone making it should actually try to support with something, anything. It might be hard to quantify, but someone could likely try to qualify it.
That's the EXACT point...me suggesting that taking it slow harmed them is as ridiculous as someone saying rushing them harmed them.

Neither angle can be proven. I can't support the argument that Player X ended up being a bust because he spent too much time in the AHL, anymore than you can support the argument that Player Y ended up being a bust because he was rushed.
 

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,463
30,320
Ottawa
Strawman.

You're on this crusade along with a certain Coach concerning development. Your thesis is that rushing a player to the NHL cannot cause any damage to a career, ever. It's a really specific and curious stance. Maybe I'm strawmaning your point myself, but it's been thousands of posts on this forum, dating back to last year, from countless posters, including yourself, and me on some occasions.
No, that's not my thesis at all...my thesis is that it's impossible to pinpoint the EXACT cause of what damaged a player and in the absence of evidence, advancing theories that said career was damaged because it was rushed, is as fluffy as saying the opposite, that it was damaged because he spent too much time in the AHL.

And yes, I intentionally presented a strawman argument because the argument that players are damaged exclusively because they were rushed, is just as much of a strawman.

So now, the goalposts have moved to defining the term "slow-cooked" (I'm not saying you personally moved them, just that it's now the focus). I believe this is not a constructive debate, because the term is subjective, it doesnt have a clear-cut meaning. It's goddamned food analogy ffs lol.
100 agreed. I said as much that it's a debate of semantics...people can define "slow cooked" differently.

See above referenced post

I'm mostly concerned about the D+1 season of a player. Reinbacher is developing somewhere else in his D+1, and for me, even if it would be for just one year before asking him to join the club, it shows at least some sort of patience and caution from management.

On the other hand, you have #20. He was played right away and is struggling mightily. The dude is talented, but he's overthinking everything right now (probably because his confidence is shot).

There are obvious reasons why dressing a player at 18 years old in a crazy market like Montréal is not a good idea. The media, the pressure from the fans. Wouldn't you agree?
But have you considered the possibility that Reinbacher will also struggle in his D+1 season? or that whenever he does make his NHL debut, regardless of how his D+1 season went, he will also struggle?

Struggling IS a part of development....not ever player is Connor McDavid off the bat, that in itself is not necessarily a sign that development has stalled or has regressed.

I would agree with your last statement that dressing a player at 18yrs old in this market is very risky, but that's only if you're terrible at managing the messaging as an organization. Fans/media expectations on players don't have to drive your evaluation of said player.

Clearly the organization and the coaching staff are evaluating Slafkovsky on a different scale than fans are.
Now, what would be the downside of playing an 18 yo Euro 1st round pick in Laval at the start of his career, and reassessing every other week or month. Would it have been damaging to act cautiously, considering the history with KK and Galchenyuk (one is fine, one is not, but both have left and are of zero use to the Canadiens, and both were rushed at 18).
Like you said, KK is fine...Galchenyuk has SERIOUS off ice issues. That wouldn't have been any different if he started in the NHL at 19yrs old like he did or if he started in the NHL at 20 or 21. He didn't take the job of being a professional hockey player seriously.

Full stop.
Seriously, what would be the downside? He'd be too good and get bored? Then... you call him up. Doing this backwards, though, is way more delicate. You risk affecting his confidence even more by sending him down.
You're asking the wrong question...the question you should be asking is what is the upside? Is it for him to rediscover his confidence?

Then OK...but taking an NHL player and sending him down to the AHL to reclaim his confidence seems counter-intuitive to me.
For me it's not about the risk of having them bust. I think that it's very difficult to isolate the definite factors behind a failed prospect. It's about what is the most rational decision on day one of their D+1 year.
Yet we DO IT ALL THE TIME whenever we say a prospect was "rushed".

I agree, it's incredibly difficult and really, impossible to really isolate the definite factors behind a failed prospect, see my first response to you above with regards to "my thesis".

Now maybe you get my angle here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toene

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,463
30,320
Ottawa
He is pacing for 0 goals and 41 assist.

That would be strangest rookie season i would have ever witnessed.
His entire argument is that we’d be so much more happy if Slafkovsky had 28pts in 57 career games instead of the 13pts in 57 career games he currently has.

All that fuss for 15pts imagine lol…THAT’s the difference between being happy with the pick or not.

Lol
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,508
106,819
Halifax
His entire argument is that we’d be so much more happy if Slafkovsky had 28pts in 57 career games instead of the 13pts in 57 career games he currently has.

All that fuss for 15pts imagine lol…THAT’s the difference between being happy with the pick or not.

Lol

Hard to notice improvements on the ice when you are watching tik tok all game long.
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,870
6,049
His entire argument is that we’d be so much more happy if Slafkovsky had 28pts in 57 career games instead of the 13pts in 57 career games he currently has.

All that fuss for 15pts imagine lol…THAT’s the difference between being happy with the pick or not.

Lol

Well i can't say he is not right tho.

But, its not the end-all-be-all right now.

Same kinda goes for Reinbacher. We can feel the fomo seeing Michkov PPG in the KHL while Reinbacher hockey db page is bad. I just watch Reinbacher, and @montreal makes it very easy for us and i feel instantly reassured as he is a terrific two-way rh defenseman with a boatload of potential.
 

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,463
30,320
Ottawa
Well i can't say he is not right tho.

But, its not the end-all-be-all right now
It's a tiny sample to draw any conclusion from. Framing it against what Benson has done over 8 games is even more ridiculous.

Seriously, if 15pts is what separates you loving this pick or hating it, why bother even watching hockey?

Just look at box scores every morning you’ll get the same out of it.



.

Same kinda goes for Reinbacher. We can feel the fomo seeing Michkov PPG in the KHL while Reinbacher hockey db page is bad. I just watch Reinbacher, and @montreal makes it very easy for us and i feel instantly reassured as he is a terrific two-way rh defenseman with a boatload of potential.
I've got not fomo for Michkov personally…Habs fans love to act like he was a birthright but 4 other teams passed on him.

I don't watch NLA or KHL, the only thing I can go off for Reinbacher is what I saw at Camp and he looked like a very poised Dman at 18yrs old.

Bodes well…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad