Your line-by-line replies are a bit hard to follow especially when they split through linked statements. You've made a hostile confrontation where there really didn't need to be.
The commentary I put forth in reply to
@Schooner Guy,
@BaseballCoach, and
@Garo was I believe simply that there was no master-plan which meant the Habs were
exceptionally so focused on the transition game in 2023 that they held it as a draft
priority. No, rather I believe simply that the Habs ranked Reinbacher over Michkov for a variety of reasons and so they picked him. Some evidence for my position is that in 2022 the first two picks of the rebuild, including the lottery pick which has a more direct impact on the NHL roster due to their odds of making it, were forwards not defenders. The 1OA could've gone anywhere given how there was no front-runner as the 2022 draft approached and the Habs specifically did not mention any defenders in their top3 options leading to the draft. It seems clear to me they just picked whoever they thought was best at that position, in both draft years.
In 2023 Had they had the 3OA they wouldn't have picked a d-man, I think if they had the 4OA they would've picked Smith. There is no master-plan or iterative stepwise approach -- so that rationalization for Reinbacher at 5OA is unnecessarily complicated. They clearly picked BPA rather than need -- this is an argument partially
in defence of the Habs and Big Brain Hughes, not in opposition to them!!
For the xième time, Michkov comes with pluses and minuses and question marks:
Same analysis can be placed on every prospect, even the very best. We don't need to do the exercise to acknowledge that a portion of the "outraged fans" felt like the analysis was wrong -- and given the Habs' history at the draft table, it's not fair to bludgeon those fans and call them impatient or ignorant. I don't feel like this should be a controversial statement -- results will follow and reveal if the Habs got it right.
Why is cheering for Reinbacher mutually exclusive from having wished for Michkov?
I find both can co-exist. I don’t need to reject one in order to appreciate the other.
Fully agree and I hope others will as well. It goes both ways but I think as Reinbacher is a Hab now, the Michkov noise will die off until the rubber hits the road in a few years and they're both playing. AKost vs Later 2003 Picks and Kotkaniemi vs Brady Tkachuk both haven't died off even though none of them play for the Habs anymore... it's wishful thinking to figure we won't hear the end of "Michkov" no matter what happens. If Reinbacher totally eclipses Michkov there will be a lot of gloating coming out of here too.
How would you qualify how Reinbacher played this year ?
I think he played in an entirely different country and league than Leo Carlsson, for one. So it's hard to compare them even if one plays C and the other D.
His stat profile seems exceptional for his age. His highlights are hard for me to parse because I don't know intuitively the strength of the Swiss National League (NLA) -- I talked it down leading up to the draft because all the high scorers are basically late 30s never-beens who never made it in the NHL... but in Reinbacher's defence the NLA is not a rookie-friendly development league and he's still managed to carve out TOI and a big role as a very young player. He's definitely not a reach at 5OA even if I personally didn't think he was a draft priority.