BenchBrawl
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2010
- 31,202
- 14,182
80/20 MM surpasses CC in my bookIn my opinion, there is a 50/50 chance he turns out not as good as Caufield.
80/20 MM surpasses CC in my bookIn my opinion, there is a 50/50 chance he turns out not as good as Caufield.
Benoit Pouliot was their target, Price second on their list - per Bob Gainey on Mitch Melnick’s show last yearAs far as I recall, price and Rask were considered the two best goalies in that draft by the amateur scouting community and some guys had Rask listed ahead of price as well.
It's was a ballsy pick at #5, but considering Brule was the general choice at that rank, that's a score for management.
Actually, I think habs brass were deciding between Marc Staal and price, so they almost got it wrong too, but it's the final selection that matters and they got it right.
Good point but something else : will ever Michkov approach Marner's number in NHL?My take (and nothing crazy either): Habs didn’t pick who they thought was the best player but rather the player they project as most likely able to help them win in the long run.
There is a difference which some fans don’t seem to understand.
Maybe this is not the best example but take Pietrangelo vs Marner. One is a 45 point complete 2-way D and the other is 100 points elite offensive forward.
Most fans would say “oh Marner is the better choice!”, but come playoff time, who actually helps their team win and go deep?
Benoit Pouliot was their target, Price second on their list - per Bob Gainey on Mitch Melnick’s show last year
Yup - that’s why they went with Price, he was 2nd on their list because Rollie the goalie had convinced the org he was generationalI think pouliot was already taken before, though.
CC is the real deal. Already in the NHL.80/20 MM surpasses CC in my book
For the xième time, Michkov comes with pluses and minuses and question marks:I think many fans are upset at the WHY - as in why did the Habs not want to draft Michkov. It's not like he fell, he went at 7. Why, given our situation and context, was he deemed by the geniuses Lapointe and Bobrov to be not good enough for the Habs? That's the question that rankles people. Maybe there's a good answer for it, or maybe not. That's the controversy as I see it.
poulliot before Kopitar, OMG. The baloney sandwich before the T-Bone steak and fries.I think pouliot was already taken before, though. They could no longer target him.
Yup - that’s why they went with Price, he was 2nd on their list because Rollie the goalie had convinced the org he was generational
But, no that still makes no sense. They've invested a lot in making our defence better in transition, from drafting to the system MSL favours. It not being the only priority is perfectly normal considering we're almost starting from scratch, but it doesn't make any less of one.The point is we cannot do post-hoc rationalization of their moves. According to them, they took the best prospect they could at every pick -- it wasn't a priority to focus on the "transition game" rather than scoring that led to them taking Reinbacher. If one of the top4 was available they would've taken that guy instead of Reinbacher. They had Reinbacher ahead of Michkov.
Some fans (not me, necessarily because I feel like I know why) are outraged at this and acting out. They will simmer down and cheer for Reinbacher should the time come.
It was very common at the time of the draft, and honestly you could say it was questionable, Pouliot had underwhelming production and basically kept the same issues for his whole career.poulliot before Kopitar, OMG. The baloney sandwich before the T-Bone steak and fries.
CC is the real deal. Already in the NHL.
CC a much better skater.
Michkov not a better snyper than CC.
CC already compete nhl level.
Habs PR masterclass turning Reinbacher into a fan favourite. Chantal earning her money for sure.That’s honestly kind of cool that Molson cares enough to go and greet him like that.
You must be from the future.I do like how passing on michkov falls directly on Montreal's shoulders, for this will be the first draft year in history where the top 4 picks live up to their pre draft forecasts
I remember Pouliot was their choice but he was not available at 5th so btw Price and Brule, they took the right oneBenoit Pouliot was their target, Price second on their list - per Bob Gainey on Mitch Melnick’s show last year
I am embarrassed of all of my current takes, I know they are wrong but I still cant help myselfYou must be from the future.![]()
More like a damage control master class. As @dinodebino argued, they should have known better with this fanbase and how idiots were bound to come out of the woodwork.Habs PR masterclass turning Reinbacher into a fan favourite. Chantal earning her money for sure.
More like a damage control master class. As @dinodebino argued, they should have known better with this fanbase and how idiots were bound to come out of the woodwork.
Idiots were plenty available as they’ve not had reason to overturn police vehicles downtown for quite some time.
Not a word on that center who did 1141 pts, won 2 SC, Selke and Lady Bing winner. Who cares about Brulé today. He wasn't my choice at all, I never considered him more than 2 seconds, just before I saw his file on internet.As far as I recall, price and Rask were considered the two best goalies in that draft by the amateur scouting community and some guys had Rask listed ahead of price as well.
It's was a ballsy pick at #5, but considering Brule was the general choice at that rank, that's a score for management.
Actually, I think habs brass were deciding between Marc Staal and price, so they almost got it wrong too, but it's the final selection that matters and they got it right.
That’s quite the blanket statement. A fan’s autographed book doesn’t change the fact that there is a hoarde of crazies posing as Habs fans and the org. should have seen it coming.Why? They got the player they wanted and the fanbase is now largely supportive of it. Seems like a win win for them.
That’s quite the blanket statement. A fan’s autographed book doesn’t change the fact that there is a hoarde of crazies posing as Habs fans and the org. should have seen it coming.
Win/ win for who? It’s too early to tell what will become of these prospects at this time. I’ll reserve judgment until both Reinbacher and Michkov arrive at the NHL level and have had a significant sample size of games. Doesn’t mean any of us don’t want to see Reinbacher succeed, even if we are not material to his success.
That's only drop in the bucket to media pressure hereIt absolutely should rock him though. It's completely disgusting.
This just smacks of an attempt to downgrade it, and we really should not do that.
Not my intent to argue with you or anyone else.I'm not gonna spend anytime arguing with you. The tone has very clearly changed from draft night/thursday morning and a lot of it is because of their use of the media to project their message for the fans to calm down.
He'll be fine, but he's still only 18. Those clowns pissed all over the best day of this kids lifeThat's only drop in the bucket to media pressure here
A wise man moves on from what he cannot change.Why is cheering for Reinbacher mutually exclusive from having wished for Michkov?
I find both can co-exist. I don’t need to reject one in order to appreciate the other.
Plus, we won’t know the end result of this either way, so management can keep on massaging it as they wish, it means squat.