Chytilmania
Registered User
- Dec 31, 2017
- 4,772
- 7,297
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0b6d/b0b6d0cba2d6ce8e44791f557c21008d69628ea6" alt="Curly-Outside-DQ.jpg"
"The old East-West flu we have from time to time can be a detriment."
03-22-2021–04-23-2021
Chytil / 17 GP / 11 PTS
Kakko / 18 GP / 10 PTS
Lafreniere / 18 GP / 8 PTS
Average / 82 GP / 45 PTS
Quinn just called the east-west hockey a flu on the team.
Best. Post. Yet.
Funny that you don't mention how 4 (14%) of the points you reference above were scored today, in a game where Quinn...did exactly what we've been clamoring for him to do with Lafreniere.
Also funny that you don't mention the fact that even though Chytil and Kakko in particular have been producing like this for a month now, that month coincides with steep drops in Chytil's TOI/G numbers. Literally, he's getting punished for playing well. He's also regularly one been one of the teams best shot generators.
I don't hate Quinn. He's doing great work with the kids on D and has been for a couple years now, but he is so clearly out of his depth working with the forwards
The bolded is a little bit of an exaggeration and a little bit of a misdirection. His even strength time, where he's produced all of his points, only dropped by about 30 seconds per game in that month compared to 3/2-3/20 (the stretch after he came back from injury). That's pretty natural aberration for a 3rd line player. Much of it also coincides with Kravtsov turning the 4th line into a legitimate tool. Rooney's ES TOI has gone up by about 20 seconds per game since Kravtsov arrived.
Where Chytil really lost TOI was on the powerplay, where he played on the second unit regularly in his first 15 games back, and hasn't played on it since. In those 15 games where he had that spot, he had no powerplay points.
There are all sorts of reasons why he didn't produce on the powerplay, including the over-reliance on PP1, and I would prefer him back on the 2nd unit now instead of Blackwell. But Chytil hasn't lost significant ice time in the spot where he's been productive, making your claim of punishment a mixed bag. Sure, he is "punished" by being taken of PP2, but he was literally producing nothing there, so I'm not sure he didn't deserve it. And he hasn't been punished where it matters, unless you want to frame a minor aberration of less than 1 shift per game as some kind of punishment.
Do you think this counted as a playoff game!That's hardly my point.
A plague on both of your houses.Quinn just called the east-west hockey a flu on the team.
Was this the right move? Kakko was clearly out of his depth last year.I don’t think people realize how much opportunity this organization has literally handed to Kakko and Lafreniere (which is obviously the correct thing to do.) 0 AHL games. 0 scratches. Their first shifts were in an NHL top-six, PP spot included.
Quinn just called the east-west hockey a flu on the team.
I don’t think people realize how much opportunity this organization has literally handed to Kakko and Lafreniere (which is obviously the correct thing to do.) 0 AHL games. 0 scratches. Their first shifts were in an NHL top-six, PP spot included.
Oh good heavens no. Sam and Joe are really brainwashing a generation of fans. Cover your ears.I mean he is not exactly wrong. The overreliance on lateral passing(in many cases into multiple defenders)is nausating at times. Its even more aggrevating when players defer to pass while having a shooting opportunity in the slot.
If the team is going to take the next step, they have to diversify their attack. Garbage goals and going to the dirty areas is usually the only way to beat defensive teams like the Islanders(who give no lanes or space).
Not to mention, for a team that wants to be a puck possession team: the Rangers are often very careless and sloppy with the puck.
How many lazy backhand passes do we see that lead to odd man rushes the other way?
Is playing alongside the best players and producing more actual development or artificial development? Not that points matter anyway.
Honestly look at the roster composition. There are 9 very talented forwards on this roster and Christ incarnate on defense. Is this buffoon really coaching them to play north-south hockey?Oh good heavens no. Sam and Joe are really brainwashing a generation of fans. Cover your ears.
This is true, and yet it is still toward the lower end of opportunity afforded to 1OA and 2OA picks in their rookie years. There are plenty of valid and questionable reasons for this, but it is a fact.
Players picked this high are generally treated differently than other prospects, and IMO for good reason.
I think LaF may surprise people in a first line role with some PP time. Confidence is a fickle thing. If the kid thinks he has the coaches backing and good things happen he will definitely gain valuable experience playing more minutes down the stretch. Even if the points don’t pile up, they need to be on the ice playing, making mistakes and learning from them and creating chances and being rewarded like last night. Confidence is key for a talented player and I think well see more of it in the final games. But like I said, as well as many I wish he made this move a few weeks backIs playing alongside the best players and producing more actual development or artificial development? Not that points matter anyway.
The main thing with the overpassing is the lack of overall shots, whether they are in a high danger area or not everyone in the hockey world fans and coaches alike know goals and scoring chances are generated by rebounds, crazy deflections, etc. the more shots they take the more goals are going to be scored in the chaos. It may not look as pretty as a perfect no look pass. But it’s needed to move on when the overall defensive game tightens upI mean he is not exactly wrong. The overreliance on lateral passing(in many cases into multiple defenders)is nausating at times. Its even more aggrevating when players defer to pass while having a shooting opportunity in the slot.
If the team is going to take the next step, they have to diversify their attack. Garbage goals and going to the dirty areas is usually the only way to beat defensive teams like the Islanders(who give no lanes or space).
Not to mention, for a team that wants to be a puck possession team: the Rangers are often very careless and sloppy with the puck.
How many lazy backhand passes do we see that lead to odd man rushes the other way?
It's a real issue. The rangers hired an old school, as North American as they come, north-south coach for a young, talented, European heavy, East-West team. It's really no wonder why our offense looks so discombobulated sometimes. They are being directed to play different hockey than the DNA of the team requires.Honestly look at the roster composition. There are 9 very talented forwards on this roster and Christ incarnate on defense. Is this buffoon really coaching them to play north-south hockey?
I don't understand why this sentiment is so easily glossed over by some. I'm necessarily pro-Quinn per se, either. But I am willing to look beyond just coaching as to reasons why the team like the Rangers is playing like a team like the Rangers.