It’s an issue of cap space. Hronek is a top level RHD that has proven his ability to play in the NHL. jiricek is a guy with potential (significant) and May one day be as good as Hronek and it’s possible better.You think you can get more than Jiricek for Hronek? You think you can get Jiricek and Kent Johnson for Filip Hronek, a UFA aged player?
It's great that Hronek has fit so well in Vancouver, but you're not getting a top tier prospect for him. If you think he's that good, then good for you, you can keep him.
As Stevo notes above, it doesn't suit the Jackets to move Jiricek for a forward. Although I would consider it if it's a really solid player like Dylan Cozens. Maybe just my opinion but I also think there is an upside gap between Jiricek and Stankoven or Eklund.
#2 - sorry, did David Jiricek come out and speak publicly because he trusts that coaches and management are handling him well? Did Patrik Laine say getting healthy scratched was something he appreciated? Merzlikins is definitely really pumped about the coaching staff too.#2 is an assumption not in evidence and #3 hasn't been relevant in years upon years; it's akin to accusing the Devils of still playing the trap. That's what makes it "because Columbus".
BARF!!! That’s brutal for Columbus and I’m not a Columbus fan.Columbus Blue Jackets
Ryan Reaves
Nick Robertson
Easton Cowan
Topi Niemelä
2024 1st round pick (TOR)
Dennis Hildeby
Toronto Maple Leafs
Boone Jenner
David Jircek
His value will still be very high as he is a legit blue chip prospect.With reports from the athletic coming out that Jiricek isn’t happy with the org. Does he pull a Cutter and demand a trade? If so, what would his value be?
It's actually not that bad as Cowan, Nirmala are good prospects but that being said I also understand why the Jackets wouldn't do it with too many contracts coming back they don't have any use for.BARF!!! That’s brutal for Columbus and I’m not a Columbus fan.
The issue I see is that CBJ has a lot of very high end forward prospects and not as many back end prospects. Any trade for Jiricek needs to include a promising young defenseman as well.
I am not advocating anything but if we're talking Vancouver; Brzustewicz must be in any offer. Edmonton? Broberg. Winnipeg? Heinola.
You're all going to see those players added on top of what is at least a first. The alternative is eating a bad contract of which CBJ has a few and that takes a few teams people are clamouring about out of the running due to a lack of cap space.
If there's any genuine interest to move him, it will be a team like Arizona, Anaheim, Buffalo. Teams with quality young players/prospects and the cap space/depth to make it happen.
Byram
2024 1st
RyJo
Oskar Olausson
Jiricek
Sillinger
You'll note the CBJ fan response in this thread is largely aligned with the bolded. We hope and expect the second part of what you posted that I've quoted here.Better off holding onto him. Tough year but things will clear up & he'll be a big part of it.
You're absolutely misunderstanding the statement, I'll also make a bolder statement and suggest that anyone taking Broberg that can grow him properly is going to be a clear winner.Broberg? Heinola? Did you get lost sometime in 2020? Those aren't top prospects. And Brzustewicz isn't on that level either.
Columbus has more high end prospects up front but they also have Mateychuk on the backend, who is better than the players you mentioned. Many other good D prospects. They're not going to be interested in a quantity deal, and nothing involving cap dumps.
The way he's played the last couple years, I'm not sure I could tell the difference between Bo Byram and Jake Bean.
Seems they have plenty of prospects as it isYou're absolutely misunderstanding the statement, I'll also make a bolder statement and suggest that anyone taking Broberg that can grow him properly is going to be a clear winner.
Brzustewicz is very interesting because he does not seem at all to be entirely defensively poor at all and is a point producing RHD prospect which is about as rare a prospect as comes.
Jiricek, Cuelemans, Mateychuk. All good prospects, but that defense is still as much a point of need as any position in the CBJ org as I can see.
The meat of the statement, is that CBJ won't benefit from yet another forward prospect as much as they would/will a defensive one
That's just my opinion though as obviously things are sailing along smoothly in CBJ with what's been going on the last number of years
Seems very lightI'd consider offering Wolf OR Coronato straight across. I'm not adding to it.
It's our 2 top prospects. Wolf is the best goalie prospect in the world. Coronato is well over a PPG in the AHL in his first year pro.Seems very light
Have you read through this thread and seen some of the other higher end offers?It's our 2 top prospects. Wolf is the best goalie prospect in the world. Coronato is well over a PPG in the AHL in his first year pro.
They may be Calgary's top prospects but that doesnt mean they'd be that on other teamsIt's our 2 top prospects. Wolf is the best goalie prospect in the world. Coronato is well over a PPG in the AHL in his first year pro.