Voodoozz
Czechmate
Second goal of the season for Galvas. Great activation from the blue line.
This all started with him not being drafted at all. Now it is not first round. I'd say he's done a lot to impress. Top 100 is reasonableIt still doesn't change anything in his draft perspective with the prospect of a selection in the 1st round.
It remains the defender with the smallest physical size and more physical offensive defenders are not what is lacking this year.
This all started with him not being drafted at all. Now it is not first round. I'd say he's done a lot to impress. Top 100 is reasonable
Still I don't think even NHL teams can simply overlook a player who is already showing he can play without problems with men, and at a world juniors he showed that he has no problem playing with 2-3yrs older guys.Go back to the first page, there was never any debate about his selection.It was always 1st round, it even started with top 10. However, I'm starting to see him as a potential 2nd rounder but that's not a given either.
Teams will take physical defenders often forgotten in the forecasts (Skahan, Emery, Lavoie, Pulkkinen). Usually it's this type of player who surprises.
Well, I can think of at least one person who is very happy with this turn of events.Those bastards do it on purpose
Very satisfiedWell, I can think of at least one person who is very happy with this turn of events.
Well, seems I walked into some bizarre lovers feud... but anyway.
Crazy he was not drafted.
You went from absolute contempt to the fact that Galvas can be drafted in the second round (some scouts even before the draft said he was better than Jiříček). You don't know what you are writing.
Badinka before Jiříček? Clown, maybe for you. Certainly not for the scouts, not even after Jiříček was out for half the season. All your rankings were about the fact that Badinka is ahead of Jiřiček, and you put Jiřiček back in the first round only because the others laughed.
So you claimed the same "triumph" about Kiviharju.
The fact that Galvas was not drafted at all is a grave mistake, and your post, where you potentially saw him in the second round, proves it. Could it be done so that you leave us alone, you fool? Which you are not capable of.
I think you and Goodyman owe this guy a big apology. I just scanned this thread quickly and he was telling you guys well over two yrs ago that Galvas wasn’t likely getting drafted and y’all were slamming himI’ll stick to criticizing you. The problem isn’t that you’re wrong, it happens to everyone, me more than others. Why I feel the need to call you out is because of how much of an asshole you come across as when you give your opinions, as if they’re fact, and the gospel and you go and belittle people who try to have a discussion with you. Galvas is another on the lengthy list of guys you’re wrong about.
You very likely didn't read everything and well, because over time his opinion apparently changed and he wrote that he could easily be drafted in the second round.I think you and Goodyman owe this guy a big apology. I just scanned this thread quickly and he was telling you guys well over two yrs ago that Galvas wasn’t likely getting drafted and y’all were slamming him
I wrote this to protect myself from your harassment and as a precaution. You would have been insufferable if that were the case and if I had maintained my original opinion. I can't even imagine how you would be if Galvas had gone 34th and Badinka undrafted.You very likely didn't read everything and well, because over time his opinion apparently changed and he wrote that he could easily be drafted in the second round.
Not going to lie, found this line hillarious.closer to the profile of a cyclist climber than an NHL defender.
Not going to lie, found this line hillarious.
What is your view on Benak and next years draft?