D David Reinbacher - EHC Kloten, NL (2023, 5th, MTL)

Colezuki

Registered User
Apr 27, 2009
9,804
6,690
Toronto
Sneaky rise to top 5?
I think everywhere I've been reading is that there's the top 4 and then another group between 5 and 12, some also have a second group between 5-6 and then 7-12, but it sounds like he's in the 7-12 group with the potential to fall into 5-6 if a team loves him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wats

Realgud

Jersey ads are a disgrace
Nov 4, 2013
5,524
6,784
realguddraftsimulator.com
I think everywhere I've been reading is that there's the top 4 and then another group between 5 and 12, some also have a second group between 5-6 and then 7-12, but it sounds like he's in the 7-12 group with the potential to fall into 5-6 if a team loves him
It's possible he goes top 4 imo. Michkov and the Russia situation, Benson's size, team's preference for drafting RD... it's possible. I don't expect Michkov to go out of the top 4 (would be a mistake in my eyes) but you never know...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wats

RefsIdeas

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 2, 2011
1,540
1,276
If he's considered the best D in the draft - found it interesting to note the last time the first defenseman was taken outside of the top 10 was 1983! In 1999 the first defenseman was taken right at the 10 spot. Those hoping he slips to the mid-teens might be disappointed.
 

Colezuki

Registered User
Apr 27, 2009
9,804
6,690
Toronto
It's possible he goes top 4 imo. Michkov and the Russia situation, Benson's size, team's preference for drafting RD... it's possible. I don't expect Michkov to go out of the top 4 (would be a mistake in my eyes) but you never know...
Yeah very fair, once we get to the draft teams always reach on the D, could see Montreal try and grab him if there in that 5-6 range and then pickup whosever left at F with there florida pick
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,432
58,522
Citizen of the world
If he's considered the best D in the draft - found it interesting to note the last time the first defenseman was taken outside of the top 10 was 1983! In 1999 the first defenseman was taken right at the 10 spot. Those hoping he slips to the mid-teens might be disappointed.
He is not falling outside of the top 10. I have him at 5 right now. He was somewhat unknown from the season start because of where he played, but he's a known quality now. He is just flat out great. Compares to Jiricek, Nemec, Mintyukov, Hughes and Edvinsson.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,657
11,548
It really depends on what happens with the lottery, but I think 7 is a likely spot for him
This is part of the reason why I think
If he's considered the best D in the draft - found it interesting to note the last time the first defenseman was taken outside of the top 10 was 1983! In 1999 the first defenseman was taken right at the 10 spot. Those hoping he slips to the mid-teens might be disappointed.
Also the RHD thing is kind of like lefty pitchers in baseball the scarcity maybe inflates their value a bit.

I really like his game and his floor is extremely high, there is a decent NHLer here but his ultimate upside probably isn't top 20 in this draft but of course not all those will meet expectations either.
 

BCNate

Registered User
Apr 3, 2016
3,350
3,347
I think most have the top 4, followed by Smith and Benson. Most years have an unexpected pick, and a Dman climbs into the mix as well. I don't doubt that Reinbacher could get taken very high.

In terms of a prospect, how does he compare to recent top 10 D's : Nemec, Jiricek, Korchinski, Power, L Hughes, Edvinsson, Clarke, Sanderson, Drysdale?

I'm hoping he is like Edvinsson just because he is big and could go higher than most expect.
 

UrbanImpact

Registered User
Apr 12, 2021
4,365
6,678
I think most have the top 4, followed by Smith and Benson. Most years have an unexpected pick, and a Dman climbs into the mix as well. I don't doubt that Reinbacher could get taken very high.

In terms of a prospect, how does he compare to recent top 10 D's : Nemec, Jiricek, Korchinski, Power, L Hughes, Edvinsson, Clarke, Sanderson, Drysdale?

I'm hoping he is like Edvinsson just because he is big and could go higher than most expect.

Id compare him to Seider, especially in terms of where he will be actually drafted.
Seider i believe was projected to go in the 15-20th spot.

Interesting enough, they actually have a lot of similarities in their game
 

GermanSpitfire

EU Video Scout for McKeen’s | Rest Easy #13
Jul 20, 2020
12,398
22,445
www.mckeenshockey.com
I think most have the top 4, followed by Smith and Benson. Most years have an unexpected pick, and a Dman climbs into the mix as well. I don't doubt that Reinbacher could get taken very high.

In terms of a prospect, how does he compare to recent top 10 D's : Nemec, Jiricek, Korchinski, Power, L Hughes, Edvinsson, Clarke, Sanderson, Drysdale?

I'm hoping he is like Edvinsson just because he is big and could go higher than most expect.
I think I’d have him below Nemec, Jiricek, Power, Hughes, Sanderaon and Drysdale but above Clarke, Korchinski and Edvinsson.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,731
32,869
In terms of a prospect, how does he compare to recent top 10 D's : Nemec, Jiricek, Korchinski, Power, L Hughes, Edvinsson, Clarke, Sanderson, Drysdale?

I'm hoping he is like Edvinsson just because he is big and could go higher than most expect.

I personally would have had him in between Nemec and Jiricek: Jiricek > Reinbacher > Nemec. I can't remember how I ranked all of those D in their drafts though I definitely was higher on Power, Edvinsson, and Sanderson. And it seems like Reinbacher is a better safer pick than Korchinski and Clarke.
 

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
7,927
13,566
Vancouver
Power > Sanderson > Jiricek > Seider > Reinbacher > Nemec > Drysdale > Edvinsson > Clarke > L. Hughes > Korchinski

This is factoring in draft year and D+1. D+2 would be unreasonable to extrapolate for the younger guys above so not factored in.

Obviously thus far, Seider is far ahead terms of NHL success being 2-3 years older.
 

mistaclick

Registered User
Feb 2, 2022
300
442
I would be very surprised if he is not the first dman off the board. If you value upside then you could maybe make the argument that Gulyayev should go first, but ASP isn’t even close to Reinbacher, he can’t defend. Simashev is OK, looks safe but I can’t justify using a lottery pick on him, whereas I can with Reinbacher/Gulyayev.

But then again it’s almost like scouts haven’t even heard of this guy. Many rankings that don’t even include him in the first round, and when they do include him they are totally off base (#10 on Central Scouting EU? Behind the two Finns, Stenberg, ASP?). Of course this is my own opinion and biased, but am I alone in thinking Reinbacher has been wildly underrated this whole season after what he’s been doing in NLA? Seems crazy to me what he’s done this year and nobody talks about him
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,731
32,869
I would be very surprised if he is not the first dman off the board. If you value upside then you could maybe make the argument that Gulyayev should go first, but ASP isn’t even close to Reinbacher, he can’t defend. Simashev is OK, looks safe but I can’t justify using a lottery pick on him, whereas I can with Reinbacher/Gulyayev.

But then again it’s almost like scouts haven’t even heard of this guy. Many rankings that don’t even include him in the first round, and when they do include him they are totally off base (#10 on Central Scouting EU? Behind the two Finns, Stenberg, ASP?). Of course this is my own opinion and biased, but am I alone in thinking Reinbacher has been wildly underrated this whole season after what he’s been doing in NLA? Seems crazy to me what he’s done this year and nobody talks about him

Yeah I'm still trying to find out why some folks have ASP ahead of Reinbacher. I can't understand that.
 

Hale The Villain

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2008
26,726
15,254
He's a pretty safe bet to play in the NHL in some capacity but I don't see the offensive upside that a lot of people do, despite his impressive numbers.

His offensive skillset and tools are all decent but not high-end in any sense. Don't see a PP QB in him, and that's where most D rack up big point totals.

He's definitely not Moritz Seider. Could see him developing into a Larsson/Roy-type shutdown 2nd pairing D, which is a valuable player.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,731
32,869
He's a pretty safe bet to play in the NHL in some capacity but I don't see the offensive upside that a lot of people do, despite his impressive numbers.

His offensive skillset and tools are all decent but not high-end in any sense. Don't see a PP QB in him, and that's where most D rack up big point totals.

He's definitely not Moritz Seider. Could see him developing into a Larsson/Roy-type shutdown 2nd pairing D, which is a valuable player.

Most clubs expect to have PPQB options. Think of Vancouver or Montreal. They'd get good value out of a Larsson/Roy type defender. And I don't think that is Reinbacher's ceiling. There are alot of things a D can do to provide value that would make them more valuable than that. Think of pushing play 5v5 like Weegar or shutting down like a Brodin or maybe Pelech. I don't know him well enough yet, but those are the attributes I'll be looking for when I watch Reinbacher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bye Bye Blueston

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad