If you donate $100 and I donate $200, does that mean that I'm a better person than you?
If I donate 10% of my salary to a charity, does that automatically make me a good person?
I mean I'm not sure why I need to explain this, one would think it's just logic but here we go...
Donating money for a good cause, in any way shape or form, and any amount that suits your budget, is a good action.
Making good actions, paired with not making bad actions, makes you a good person.
The end.
I'm not sure why you're comparing two good actions and trying to determine whether one is better than the other, that's completely irrelevant. The initial point of the poster I was replying to is that Subban striked him as a bad person. If Subban strikes you as a bad person and you want to argue about that, fine let's do it. Otherwise you're not adding anything.
PK Subban seems to be one of the most loved and hated player in the league. People either love him or hate him based on his personality while they should judge him on his actions. Very few are actually able to be neutral when talking about him, especially the good old boys club that just hate anyone that has a personality and isn't afraid to show it. If McDavid did what Subban did as "donation" (feel free to call it whatever you wanna call it), there would be f***ing parades in every city in North America for him and every HF poster would be praising him and taking flights to Edmonton just to feed him grapes and wax his shoes. Now, because it's Subban .. Completely different story. People are here arguing whether donating 100$ makes you a lesser person than someone who donates 200$. Absolutely nuts man.
And I know some people here are just TRIGGERED whenever they hear something positive about Subban. This thread just further proves that and honestly it's just the funniest thing seeing people scramble trying to spin everything he does into a negative.