He’ll be remembered as the Dan Marino of hockey: a regular season monster who could never get it done when it mattered.
Marino was not blameless, but his defense was often bad and his run game completely inconsistent. Cook those two elements together and you have a great QB forced to sling the ball too often from behind in the hopes of coming back from huge holes his defense dug his offense into against much better all-around teams (49ers and Bills).
You’re not wrong about the perception that exists of Marino and any other athlete who never won a championship in their respective sport, but it’s too simplistic and has no finesse or nuance. Marino gets drafted to a team as strong as the 49ers and we’re very likely having very different discussions about his placement in history. We think about Montana and their offense, but from 1981 through 1990, their defense was 1st-4th in points allowed 8 times in those 10 seasons.
These are team sports. The team around these players still need to function as a unit and give the greatest player on their team a real shot to carry them and finish off a run.
A good hockey example is Mario missing 54 out of 80 games in 1990-1991 and the team still winning the division title to put them into good playoff position for him to work his magic (and missing 16 more games the next season and 6 games during their repeat playoff run where they were good enough to oust the Presidents’ trophy winning Rangers largely without him as well as take Game 1 without him in the next series against the Bruins).
Doesn’t take anything away from Lemieux, but it’s important to highlight how a capable team needs to be provided around the superstar by competent management for true success.