Video Nasty
Registered User
- Mar 12, 2017
- 5,964
- 10,516
I like how you dismiss Jagr's 5th Art Ross win and 4th of that streak, attributing it Lemieux's comeback, while ignoring that Jagr's very first Art Ross ever, in 1994-1995, was also won without Lemieux. So 4.5 of his 5 Art Ross season were without Lemieux.
And I said slightly above Jagr at best right now because, they both have 5 wins in 7 seasons. Jagr is no spring chicken, let's not forget that he's sitting at #2 all times in points.
You like it? I’m glad, because I was responding to your comment about him winning “4 straight Rosses without Lemieux”.
Jagr is an all-time great man, one of my favorites. Whenever Crosby, Ovechkin, and Malkin had their peak years, I always compared those to “the best since peak Jagr”. But I will always mention his apathy until Lemieux came back during the second half of 2000-2001 because people seem to forget about it. It is fact that he doesn’t win it without Mario that year and the Hart voters of the time agreed. I don’t even blame him for it because he had to do so much heavy lifting for those teams and it probably got annoying after awhile.
But this won’t be close when it’s all said and done.
It’s already teetering once you factor in Harts, Hart finishes, Pearsons/Lindsays, and raw point/PPG placements…and that’s comparing one player with 569 games versus one who has 1733 (I would even be fair and just compare Jagr’s 1273 games before he left).