bucks_oil
Registered User
- Aug 25, 2005
- 8,752
- 5,138
This is a silly thread and I agree... populated with too many people that didn't watch the series.
Other than Talbot there were no dominant individual performances that show up on a stat sheet. This was a tough sledding series with very few goals and exceptional defense. The next best performer on either series was Vlasic because he did a great job on McD.
The only reason you noticed Vlasic's performance is because he was tasked with McDavid... who was dangerous nearly every shift. It was not a "Bad Series", it was a series where defense trumped offense. McD, who was a major part of our PK, played a major and successful role in our PK and defending success. Had he not played well in this role, we'd have lost the series in four games.
In hockey you gotta take what is given you, compete each shift and find a way to win. McD did exactly that and STILL managed to chip in as much offense as any other player in the series.
Other than Talbot there were no dominant individual performances that show up on a stat sheet. This was a tough sledding series with very few goals and exceptional defense. The next best performer on either series was Vlasic because he did a great job on McD.
The only reason you noticed Vlasic's performance is because he was tasked with McDavid... who was dangerous nearly every shift. It was not a "Bad Series", it was a series where defense trumped offense. McD, who was a major part of our PK, played a major and successful role in our PK and defending success. Had he not played well in this role, we'd have lost the series in four games.
In hockey you gotta take what is given you, compete each shift and find a way to win. McD did exactly that and STILL managed to chip in as much offense as any other player in the series.