Prospect Info: Connor Bedard - 2023 1st - C, Regina

Status
Not open for further replies.

giza

Registered User
Jul 19, 2011
1,449
640
Patrick Kane rarely got lit up. His awareness of what was around him is 2nd to none. If Bedard has 3/4's of that awareness and plays in the same areas as Kane, his size won't matter. My concern is how long they try him at center---which has more 200 foot demands and increases the physicality potential....I see him at wing before the year is over to be honest.
 

HeisenBaez

Registered User
Nov 3, 2008
3,406
1,489
Heart of Dixie
even if they took away a pick, and very well maybe they should have, it would have been in last year's draft anyway.

unless, I guess, multiple first round picks over multiple drafts was the price to pay for the heinous behavior of some in our front office. I guess that's debatable.

any case, Hawks did what they needed to do and justly fired those involved. lucking out in the Bedard sweepstakes has Jack shut to do with it. it was pure luck completely in the letter & spirit of a draft lottery.

allowing for an unpredictable outcome like this is literally the point of having a lottery.

the salt is richly real.
It became an outrage for other fans on May 8, 2023. And only because this draft had Conner Bedard, etc. If this was one of those bland drafts, like last year, the outrage would be nil. So these fans are using Kyle Beach to fit their own narrative against the Hawks and I find it disgusting.
 

thedarkstark

Registered User
Jun 22, 2012
798
778
Patrick Kane rarely got lit up. His awareness of what was around him is 2nd to none. If Bedard has 3/4's of that awareness and plays in the same areas as Kane, his size won't matter. My concern is how long they try him at center---which has more 200 foot demands and increases the physicality potential....I see him at wing before the year is over to be honest.
This is my concern also. A lot is asked of a first line C defensively, I know he has the compete level but being 5'10 makes it a lot harder because you have to expend more energy. I think he has the capability to do it just not sure if it's actually the best way to utilize his skillset long-term.
 

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
32,340
11,975
London, Ont.
This is my concern also. A lot is asked of a first line C defensively, I know he has the compete level but being 5'10 makes it a lot harder because you have to expend more energy. I think he has the capability to do it just not sure if it's actually the best way to utilize his skillset long-term.
Crosby a C, other smaller in stature players around his size have played C. He'll have no problem, he has a very low center of gravity and he'll be hard to knock off the puck. He'll learn to protect the puck just like Sid. Not sure why there is any concern.
 

CallMeShaft

Registered User
Apr 14, 2014
16,340
22,835
I'm not expecting a Selke like performance from him in the future, but Bedard generates through the middle in the offensive zone. Putting him along the boards isn't utilizing his offensive potential.

So until he shows he can't stick at C long term, he should be viewed as a center.
 

thedarkstark

Registered User
Jun 22, 2012
798
778
Crosby a C, other smaller in stature players around his size have played C. He'll have no problem, he has a very low center of gravity and he'll be hard to knock off the puck. He'll learn to protect the puck just like Sid. Not sure why there is any concern.
Everything you just mentioned pertains to offense. Nobody questions that he will be an elite playmaker/scorer no matter where he plays. We specifically cited defense as the area of concern. You can be a good defender at a small stature but it's harder because your reach is shorter and bigger guys dont have to expend as much energy in the dirty areas because they can just throw their weight around.

If he ends up being gassed in the o-zone from having to work too hard in the d-zone he might be a better fit at wing. It's not about ability it's just physics. We can't just pencil him in as a crosby level defender because he hasnt shown that yet.
 

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
32,340
11,975
London, Ont.
Everything you just mentioned pertains to offense. Nobody questions that he will be an elite playmaker/scorer no matter where he plays. We specifically cited defense as the area of concern. You can be a good defender at a small stature but it's harder because your reach is shorter and bigger guys dont have to expend as much energy in the dirty areas because they can just throw their weight around.

If he ends up being gassed in the o-zone from having to work too hard in the d-zone he might be a better fit at wing. It's not about ability it's just physics. We can't just pencil him in as a crosby level defender because he hasnt shown that yet.
No, not everything I said pertains to offense. You want to protect the puck in the D zone when you get it as well, your quickness allows you to escape situations that you don't have to expand energy on. Having great hands and vision allows you to make quick plays.

Crosby is great defensively. Brayden Point is great defensively, lots of centers that are 5'11 are good defensively, he's only 1 inch shorter..lol it's a dumb argument. Being shorter, if you even consider 5'10 short, has little bearing on you being good defensively. Having IQ and quickness with your feet help much more.

Crosby hadnt shown he was great at D when he was 17 either.
 

thedarkstark

Registered User
Jun 22, 2012
798
778
Crosby is great defensively. Brayden Point is great defensively, lots of centers that are 5'11 are good defensively, he's only 1 inch shorter..lol
Why are you trying to conflate possibility with probability? It's POSSIBLE for a guy who is 5'9 to dunk a basketball but it's not PROBABLE.

People need to chill with the "same height is crosby, therefore as good as crosby" takes. I hope he's our 1C puts up 150 pts and wins a selke but I'm not going to put that kind of pressure & expectation on him.
 

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
32,340
11,975
London, Ont.
Why are you trying to conflate possibility with probability? It's POSSIBLE for a guy who is 5'9 to dunk a basketball but it's not PROBABLE.

People need to chill with the "same height is crosby, therefore as good as crosby" takes. I hope he's our 1C puts up 150 pts and wins a selke but I'm not going to put that kind of pressure & expectation on hihim.
I'm saying that you are wrong saying that height or lack thereof has zero bearing on you being a good defensive player. And Bedard isn't even that short.

Yes, it's possible he doesn't figure out the defensive end in his career, but it won't be because he didn't try (Kane) or because of his height (Point, Crosby,etc).

No where has anyone said that just because he is the same height as Crosby he will be as good as him lol. The point is, height is not a factor for him whatsoever.
 

Drumman44

Kyle Beach Deserved Better
May 2, 2017
1,960
2,836
The Hawks would be stupid not to find 2 way centers to play behind Bedard. If they're expecting him to take on a Toews-esque 2 way workload they're already f***ing up.

I would say get Ryan O’Reilly in free agency but he completely gave up on a bad team in Buffalo already. Not sure he’d want to do it again
 

Darkstar

Registered User
Nov 3, 2007
648
643
Denver, CO
I think at Regina, he had to cheat a lot because he was pretty much all they had. There's no reason as of yet to think his defense can't be developed to an acceptable level.
 

Taze em

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
8,689
1,022
Question. Would you take Kane’s individual career (no guarantee on three cups) for Bedard?

It’s kind of wild but I think I would feel pretty disappointed with that. Which is kind of ridiculous of me.
 

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
21,579
18,565
Bomoseen, Vermont
No, I would not be disappointed if Bedard had a similar impact as Kane.

If that happened it would be less than what people expect of him currently, but certainly a player you can win with.
 

CallMeShaft

Registered User
Apr 14, 2014
16,340
22,835
I want him to wind up better than Kane when all is said and done.

But 88 has been a damn good player and there is no shame if Bedard only ends up at that level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Idionym

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,781
13,797
Question. Would you take Kane’s individual career (no guarantee on three cups) for Bedard?

It’s kind of wild but I think I would feel pretty disappointed with that. Which is kind of ridiculous of me.
That undersells Kane’s career. He was 4th place in the Ovie/Sid/Malkin tier for a huge chunk of his career. I hope he comes back and plays for another 3-5 years. He has a shot at 1500 points. One of the best we’ll ever see as Hawk fans for sure.
 

BLKHKhockey

Registered User
Aug 28, 2009
701
493
Stats aside, Kane was one of the most electric players. His playmaking and creativity were a treat to watch. Factor in how clutch he was and it's gonna be hard to top him, entertainment-wise. Here's hoping Bedard does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad