Bear of Bad News
Now 25% more unBearable!
- Sep 27, 2005
- 15,135
- 31,365
I’ll care.No one's going to care about some meaningless match with no implications on the standings/rankings/ tournament or bowl games. etc

Last edited:
I’ll care.No one's going to care about some meaningless match with no implications on the standings/rankings/ tournament or bowl games. etc
Didn't the Pac make overtures to Texas (I believe they would have came with OU, and maybe A&M and OkSt), but Texas thought they'd make more money with the Longhorns network and told them that, plus I believe there was political pressure at that time to stay in the Big 12 to not kill off the other Texas schools as P5 teams. I believe this was in 2010 or so, right before A&M and Missouri jumped.Those are the only two programs I feel sorry for in this whole mess, Wazzu and the Beavs. From everything I've read Cal and Stanford did more than enough to torpedo any kind of expansion into Big 12 territory that could have saved the conference.
The first re-alignment bloodbath the Pac had every chance to offer OU, OSU, Texas, and A&M, they passed. A&M and Missouri to the SEC and Colorado and Utah go to the PAC instead. Big 12 backfills with TCU and plucks West Virginia after the ACC destroys what was left of the Big East by taking Pitt and Syracuse. From what I've heard from some SC fans I know they were pushing for a move to 16 but Cal/Stanford, and a couple others had no interest in adding the other 4 schools mostly due to Longhorn Network and this issues that would have been involved in getting rid of that to create a conference network.
Time two - the one where the Pac REALLY could have killed the Big 12. Texas and OU are gone to the SEC. Pac could easily grab Kansas, Oklahoma State, TCU, and Texas Tech leaving the Big 12 as basically the American with fan support. They say no, though IIRC USC and UCLA were one foot out the door already for the B1G and didn't support it this time.
There was also a meeting between the Pac 12 commish and the old Big 12 commish Bowlsby that discussed merging the two conferences that nothing came of.
Oh wait, if the Big Ten sticks at 18, then the geographic split would cut through Illinois, leaving it up in the air in regard to which division that the Illini are in….
Oy….
There was political pressure to stay in the Big 12 no doubt. But they knew they would make (at the time a lot) more money in the Pac. The fight they had with the Pac 10 was regarding tier 3 rights. They knew they had a good thing going with LHN and didn't want to lose that for a conference network unless they were going to make more from that, which nobody outside the Big 10 was. Actually I'm not even sure the Big 10 was, LHNs contract was a disaster for ESPN.Didn't the Pac make overtures to Texas (I believe they would have came with OU, and maybe A&M and OkSt), but Texas thought they'd make more money with the Longhorns network and told them that, plus I believe there was political pressure at that time to stay in the Big 12 to not kill off the other Texas schools as P5 teams. I believe this was in 2010 or so, right before A&M and Missouri jumped.
I could be wrong, but I believe that deal was predicated on Texas (which while A&M and OU are big programs, football wise, Texas despite their struggles are maybe the biggest crown jewel outside of ND) and Texas due to a variety reasons (political, potential revenue from Longhorn Network etc.) was non-commital.
Still murmurs that Yormark has the go ahead to get to 18 if the media partners will dance.UConn fans are crying. The PAC implosion may have torpedoed their dreams of joining the Big 12.
Unfortunately even as a New England guy I don't think UConn would ever have flown for some of the Big 12 presidents as a full member even if Yormark was pushing hard for it.UConn fans are crying. The PAC implosion may have torpedoed their dreams of joining the Big 12.
There's always the next realignment cycle. That may be my best hope for my wish that they and Boise State, Memphis, South Florida, SMU, Temple, and Tulane to join.UConn fans are crying. The PAC implosion may have torpedoed their dreams of joining the Big 12.
I don't want any full members in the Big 12 for just non-football sports. Gonzaga would be better off in a new conference that also includes current Big East members Butler, Creighton, DePaul, Marquette, and Xavier, current A-10 members Dayton, Loyola (Chicago) and Saint Louis, Detroit Mercy of the Horizon League, Valparaiso of the MVC, and WCC rival Saint Mary's. ESPN would love to be involved with such a conference especially now that they severed ties with the Big Ten.Unfortunately even as a New England guy I don't think UConn would ever have flown for some of the Big 12 presidents as a full member even if Yormark was pushing hard for it.
There is a shot that they could be an Olympic sport only addition along with Gonzaga, and that actually would make a lot of sense to get into the PNW and New England markets with the biggest non football sports brands in either market.
I think your general line of thinking is great and inclusive - I don’t think the final arrangement will be that way though. I also don’t think UNM is going to move the needle enough. UConn and Memphis down the road maybe.I could also see New Mexico joining the Big 12 in the next realignment cycle so that each Four Corners state has its flagship institution in the conference. Decent basketball program.
I'm going to miss the Apple Cup very much.
I'm also one of the few UW fans who roots for WSU when they aren't playing UW.
I can still vividly recall game events of about twenty different Apple Cups just sitting here thinking about it.
Current favorite is probably 2002:
![]()
Ten years ago, Huskies won a wild Apple Cup in Pullman
In 2002, the Huskies beat Washington State 29-26 in Pullman in triple overtime, ending the Cougars' national-title hopes. The game was the last for Mike Price at WSU and Rick Neuheisel at Washington.www.seattletimes.com
Watching from a hotel room in western South Dakota after coaching hockey.
Yup! Or 10 years earlier for the Cougs side, Bledsoe to Bobo in the snow was legendary.
2002 game was great. Nate Robinson Fr year -- he was same class as me, our HS leagues were scheduled to play 1st round of the state playoffs the year prior so if they, or we, would have finished 2nd instead of both winning our leagues (1 v. 2, 1 v. 2 for the two Metro League v. our league 1st rd matchups) would have got to play against him. I did play against Reggie Williams in 7on7 though, or "passing league" as we called it back then, at UPS.
1992 was fun in retrospect, but I was hoping for another top finish before Billy Joe Hobert and team got screwed by USC/UCLA ("Pac 9") and caused Don James to go into retirement.
^ - Great example of conference history!
(side note: all the Puyallup QBs back then!)
My Uncle hated Nick Saban until I told him he played for Don James at Kent State. Immediately changed his opinion, ha. The Dawgfather is revered around these parts.
Puyallup HS was absolutely nuts, and that's even if you count only Huards (and I always felt Sam should have gone to Puyallup instead of Kennedy).
I have a complicated relationship with Saban but I do love that he's part of the James tree. I used to have all of the Dawgfather posters up.
But but but anatuerismNick Saban departed my alma mater in the middle of the night on a private jet plane for a $3m/year deal with LSU.
Awesome recruiter. Total mercenary. Still bitter.
Yup. People outside The Great State of Washington don't understand how big of a deal the Apple Cup is here. Which sums up a lot of people not understanding a big part of what makes college football great (tradition.) While they're getting all excited about UCLA-Rutgers, we'll be missing the Apple Cup (and Civil War for that matter.)
Puyallup HS was absolutely nuts, and that's even if you count only Huards (and I always felt Sam should have gone to Puyallup instead of Kennedy).
I have a complicated relationship with Saban but I do love that he's part of the James tree. I used to have all of the Dawgfather posters up.