Yea my wording wasn't ideal. I was trying to say if we get Trotz then all bets are off meaning he will do things his way which I am fine with.
However, if we get a coach like Monty I would like to see three balanced scoring lines and a 4th line anchored by Lowry that gets more 5v5 usage than our 4th line under Maurice. Each scoring line would have a solid pair and a role player. Less minutes for the top guys for sure because I want to see everyone back under 20 so they can pick up the pace to execute the new system that will surely be more skewed towards shot suppression and being harder to play against.
Well we definitely have a fundamentally different approach.
I think if you put Perfetti at centre, you're asking the Scheif to take more faceoffs in the d-zone, because we're going into next season so far with 2 guys above 50% on the draw, Lowry and Scheif. And only one RH centre.
I still see his best spot as with Connor-Dubois. It worked well last season, relatively well at least, in terms of underlying stats. It's building off something that worked, and building up confidence for the young player.
If it works well, I think the fundamental change would be moving Perfetti on to the top PP, over Wheeler. Ballsy but let's say Perfetti is a shiftier passer, and a better skater, so I think that opens up some options.
I think 4 line hockey works, but my approach is different.
I'm looking at probably
Connor-Dubois-Perfetti (with a 60% OZ to DZ start ratio)
Ehlers-Scheifele-Wheeler (this is a line that I would also like to see neutral zone out, which might increase their scoring potential and +/-).
then
?-Lowry-Appleton. Copp on that line made it such an effective line, with everyone on it scoring near .5 PPG in 2021. Losing a RW in Appleton had a negative effective on Lowry's game, that none of Vesalainen, Harkins, Poganski or Reichel could replace. Lowry's game looked better once the Apple tree came back.
Personally I'd like a quality top 6ish forward in that spot, someone who can play up the lineup (Copp/Stastny). But I'm also intrigued by a guy like Harkins being a good fit, because having speed generated on the wing, is something that worked for Lowry (Calgary series). Harkins and Apples have shown chemistry, but I think I would prefer more talent, which isn't easy as Cap calculation without moving anyone leaves the Jets in a tight spot. And then you have Trotz making a lot, if he comes here, and what's the fulcrum for True North's budget? Does it affect payroll, because the Jets before last season always had some manoeuvrability in their Cap management?
Barron-Gustafsson-? I think these are two real strong defensive players potentially that may earn some playing time from a head coach in defensive zone scenarios. There's still some RH depth missing, and I think this is a good landing spot for a veteran centre/RW. I had a guy like Derek Stepan, who Arniel coached in NY, and another Minnesota guy, as a good candidate. Looking at fundamentals, another RHC who takes draws takes pressure off Scheif, and if they can kill penalties that's a role the Jets will be looking at help with, as I think fundamentals again, having a RH centre doesn't pigeon hole a team into having their centres being forced into weak side draws, and you can't understate faceoffs on the PK as an area that is important for killing time, with intital possession. With Stastny I think he was veteran enough to win faceoffs anywhere, so if he came back that's one less area to consider.
Then you are left with those murky players Harkins, Toninato, Svetchnikov (who is in my opinion worth keeping around for offensive depth), Reichel fighting in TC. Barron probably has to make an impression to stay up, as he is waiver eligible, but he's probably feeling pretty good after the AHL playoffs.
But I look at last year, and Gustafsson did everything to win a TC spot, but because of Cap issues which forced a 22 player roster, and only one other player who could be demoted without waivers, Vesalainen, winning an opening spot, he was forced to play in the A.
I think the Jets need to take a good look at Gustafsson as a 4c before we look at Perfetti as a 3c, because there will only be one guy with a solid defensive record, if Perfetti moves into the middle, up the middle. God help us if he gets injured.
I also like the idea of part of the Jets identity being having the biggest centres in the Conference, if a coach wants to lean on their opposition a bit more, and it facilitates having a smaller defense, if the puck support is good.
That's my thoughts.
PS Edit: I agree about ice time distribution, I think that is a key factor in fatigue.