Confirmed with Link: [COL, CAR, CHI] Rantanen-Hall to CAR, Necas-Drury-25 2nd-26 4th to COL, Chi 25 3rd to Chi (Ret 50% on Mikko)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Just stop with the Burakovsky shit.. seriously the dude was on the third line and a non factor for most of the playoffs outside of one or two plays.

He wasn't the key to jack shit.

Me every time someone brings up missing him like some magic ingredient. 🤮

We miss Gabriel Landeskog, not Burasoftsky.

Whoa whoa whoa, Cobra, do you secretly have a crush on Burakovsky? Do you miss him as much as the Avs missed his zone entries?

iu
 
Yeah I would agree with that. Burky did have a laser shot, but it took a while to wind up. Necas seems to have a pretty lethal shot too, he just doesn't take it often, so it's hard to compare early on.

Will be interesting to see how his shot evolves over the years.

I don't think Burakovksy was any kind of secret ingredient, but the fact is he was a zone entry specialist, and this team relies a lot on zone entires. He wasn't a massive loss or anything, but their transition game suffered a bit with his loss.

I'd really like to see Necas on the second line like you mention. Problem is I don't think they'll play him at center for the same reasons they didn't play Mikko there, and they also like to have another high end talent play with MacKinnon. I think Nate does too. It would make for more balanced lines though.
Yeah I don't want it to seem like Bura was a major core piece of that cup winning team, but he was quite emblematic of what Bednar wants on his guys to do in the neutral zone. As Poke and A Basin said while he was a very good fit for the system, he was also frustrating at times(hence why he's a 2nd liner not a first liner) and clearly someone that didn't need to be brought back after his contract ended.

As for Necas, I think his big thing will be shooting more than anything else. He has a decent shot and he's kind decent at all aspects of it, in terms of release, power, etc. I don't think he'll ever have a shot that goalies fear, but I think he's clearly a good enough playmaker that he should become a very well rounded offensive threat. And if they don't move Mitts, I think it would make sense to see him at C just to see if thats an option going forwards. Even then I don't think he needs to be at C to make the 2nd line a threat. His transition ability is insane and he will easily be able to drive a 2nd line with Mitts imo, considering he was already playing as good as he has this year mainly with Kotkaniemi.
 
Yeah I don't want it to seem like Bura was a major core piece of that cup winning team, but he was quite emblematic of what Bednar wants on his guys to do in the neutral zone. As Poke and A Basin said while he was a very good fit for the system, he was also frustrating at times(hence why he's a 2nd liner not a first liner) and clearly someone that didn't need to be brought back after his contract ended.

As for Necas, I think his big thing will be shooting more than anything else. He has a decent shot and he's kind decent at all aspects of it, in terms of release, power, etc. I don't think he'll ever have a shot that goalies fear, but I think he's clearly a good enough playmaker that he should become a very well rounded offensive threat. And if they don't move Mitts, I think it would make sense to see him at C just to see if thats an option going forwards. Even then I don't think he needs to be at C to make the 2nd line a threat. His transition ability is insane and he will easily be able to drive a 2nd line with Mitts imo, considering he was already playing as good as he has this year mainly with Kotkaniemi.

Most players that aren't high level players are imperfect frustrating players at times. Even some of the high level ones like Mikko can be frustrating. You take the good with the bad.

Burakovsy was a 20 goal, 60 point, zone entry specialist, that could be an X factor OT hero with his shot, making $4.9M. He wasn't a huge loss, but he was a solid depth winger that provided an element that makes Bednar's system work better.

The Avs between Burky and Necas weren't really a rush team any more. They were a one line rush team. The other three were kind of meat and potatoes cycle lines.

Now Necas in theory can give them two rush lines again, being the zone entry specialist on the second line, like Burakovksy was. Which helped Kadri have a lot of success with his rush attack game. Now if they can find a quicker center, it could be a very good rush line.

Then if Landy comes back, they could have a 3rd line that's decent at rush attacks too, with Colton-Drury-Landy. Gabe was always the setup up man for Nate's rush attack in the neutral zone, and both Colton and Drury have shown they can use their speed to generate chances off the rush. Mikko took over for Gabe's role setting up Nate's transition game, and Drouin will probably have to take over for Mikko.

If they retool this team in the right way, they could get closer to the speed game they had in 22, which they lost at bit of, and benefited a lot from zone entries, which played a part in their Cup win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Abusement Park
I was never a Bura fan but that OT goal in game 1 of the Final was worth it all.
I was a huge Burakovsky fan but seeing him fizzle out in Seattle let me know the Avs made the most out of him and moved on at the best possible time.

That said, his OT goal and putting the puck through the f***ing net against Nashville will never be forgotten.
 
I was a huge Burakovsky fan but seeing him fizzle out in Seattle let me know the Avs made the most out of him and moved on at the best possible time.

That said, his OT goal and putting the puck through the f***ing net against Nashville will never be forgotten.

Just to be clear, this was never about whether or not they should have kept Burakovsky. I think most people believed then and now it was the right decision not to spend their cap space on re-signing him.

It was specifically about his zone entires, which is something that's a key part of Bednar's system, and the Avs rusk attack game, and something they lacked a bit of IMO before Necas came on board.
 
Here's the fun stat of the day: Since the trade, at 5v5, Lehkonen's GF/GA ratio: 10/0.

The not so fun stats (below) is that in the 8 games since, Colorado is still a one line team. That one line has been absolutely nuts, but the Avalanche still have severe depth issues:

#LineCF%GFGAGF%xGF%
1aLehkonen/MacKinnon/Necas65.8%60100.0%67.7%
1bDrouin/MacKinnon/Necas68.4%1325.0%62.4%
2aDrouin/Mittelstadt/Parssinen51.1%1233.3%45.5%
2bLehkonen/Mittelstadt/Parssinen56.8%20100.0%59.8%
3Wood/Drury/Colton51.1%030.0%54.8%
4Kiviranta/Kelly/O'Connor43.1%1233.3%42.1%

Another horrible stat: I've been a fan of the Kivi/Kelly/O'C line this year. All the underlying metrics are good, but there's one thing that stands out...

LineCF%GFGAGF%xGF%
Kiviranta/Kelly/O'Connor52.7%1 :help:109.9%52.5%

Yeah, one thing is clear. They need more goals outside the top line.

Nate needs to start shooting more with Mikko gone, Necas probably needs to drop to the 2nd line to help there, they need a 2C that can score goals, and they need to get Val and/or Landy back, to improve the offensive depth in the bottom six.

If they can manage to get all of that, they might be in pretty good shape to contend again. Need another impact defenseman though IMO. A #3-4 RD to push Manson down and a #6 LD to pair with him would be ideal.
 
Zone entries matter for the simple reason that the attacking team has the puck in the offensive zone first. Dump and chase teams can generate plenty of offensive zone time and possession, but they have to be elite or damn near it at puck retrieval. Carolina, the Kings in their Cup-winning prime, are two such examples. The Avs are most definitely not elite at puck retrieval, so zone entries are everything to them.

I wouldn't call Burakovsky a one-man show. That guy was phenomenal at spearheading what was at the time the best transition game in hockey. Obviously when he wasn't doing that he was a ghost, but he was a great fit for the Avs when they needed him. Necas adds that dimension while also being able to manage the puck a little better near as I can tell.
There was a reason he was the secondary slingshot on the PP behind Mack. Cobra is just on some legendary haterade for Burakovsky. I really enjoyed watching that dude play. I’d love another 60 point winger with transition game on the team.
 
There was a reason he was the secondary slingshot on the PP behind Mack. Cobra is just on some legendary haterade for Burakovsky. I really enjoyed watching that dude play. I’d love another 60 point winger with transition game on the team.
Well, I'm very hopeful Necas is just that guy. He doesn't have the release Burky had, but I'd say he's an even faster skater, bigger body, and better puck skill. One thing that drove me nuts about Burky (aside from the usual peaks and valleys) was that he was downright lousy at settling down pucks. Passes to him had to be damn near perfect or he bobbled them. I remember getting frustrated with Mikko's ability to just fire the puck on the right side on the power play, then he was out for a while and AB took his place and, well, I kinda shut up after that.

Regardless, I think he was a really great fit for the Avs, and they got the most out of him than any other team or coach would have. They got him at the right time, and they moved on at the right time. I hope for his own sake that AB finds a situation somewhere where he's not mired on a roster full of talentless grinders.
 
Just to be clear, this was never about whether or not they should have kept Burakovsky. I think most people believed then and now it was the right decision not to spend their cap space on re-signing him.

It was specifically about his zone entires, which is something that's a key part of Bednar's system, and the Avs rusk attack game, and something they lacked a bit of IMO before Necas came on board.
Yeah I think a bit part of the struggles the Avs have had is losing that zone entry ability that's so necessary in Bednars system. Nuke is decent at it, but probably shouldn't be the focal point of zone entries and same with Drouin. Lehky is awesome and a great compliment in the top 6, but play driving and zone entries aren't really his strength. It used to be wave after wave of pressure with the Avs because every line had at least one guy who was decent and zone entries and one guy that was great at them. And for whatever reason post cup win they shied away from that and went for more meat and potato guys who could skate well but couldn't handle the puck for shit. And it seems to have a trickle down effect everywhere.

And I think that's why the Avs numbers defensively in the zone are actually quite similar to what they have been over the last ~7 years but the results seem worse because we aren't sustaining pressure in the O Zone anywhere near as much as we used to. Our defense has never necessarily been elite at true "meat and potatoes" defense, but we had some of the best puck moving dmen in the league getting the puck to some of the best transition forwards in the game. So every time we got the puck it almost always turned into an offensive chance or O zone pressure. We still have roughly the same transition defense ability but the zone entry and transition ability of the offense has become incredibly top heavy and I think we're seeing with Necas just how important the transition game is for Bednar and his system.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad