bov
Registered User
- Nov 13, 2010
- 7,370
- 3,535
It would be hard for Kuemper not to have success in Colorado, but that's one hell of a deal by Arizona.
Is this a joke?Colorado's Defense is better than Seattle's?Sure if you say so
Is this serious?Colorado's Defense is better than Seattle's?Sure if you say so
The problem is it's ok to learn from your mistakes while your team is young/rebuilding - Not when it's a contender.
As said before...The Avs aren't winning a Cup with this current lineup and Kuemper, but now they don't have the assets from the 2022 draft to improve the goaltending situation further.
And with a handful of UFA's coming up in the next 1-2 years and their depth already tested with their shrinking cap space, I don't know how the Avs correct course. I guess they'll have to throw bad money after bad and trade their 2023 1st to get a real goalie later this season or for next.
Just a crap situation to be in right now for a team that needed to IMPROVE this offseason - Not stay the same (or maybe get worse). For a few years they were ahead of the curve. This offseason has changed things and now they're chasing it.
AVs finished with the best record in the league, top 5 offence/defence, top 10 farm, youngest top 30 roster and more cap space than last season. Next draft they’ve moved the 1st & 2nd and traded surplus RFA - Timmins.
It’s not all doom and gloom with only Mack being the biggest deal remaining. I hate this overpayment. Sakic had badly lost this trade, they have next season to add Goalies. Long term they’re still positioned among the best teams in the league.
Pretty much any goalie transaction that happened would've been better than a 1st/Timmons for Kuemper...
- Signing Grubauer for the deal he got would've been better.
- Trading a 3rd for Nedeljkovic would've been better.
- Just taking on Fluery's contract (if he would play for you)
- ...Or trade for Lehner
- Halak/Mrazek as a free place holder until something else opens up
- Freddie Andersen
- Call Florida before the expansion draft and make a deal for Driedger
I mean it's almost like Sakic zigged 10 times in a row when all he had to do was zag just once. He's done so much right over the past 5 years, but this is just horrible GMing. Like Peter Chiarelli level.
$2.5 million in salary differential is massive when you are up against the cap($3.5 for Kuemper compared to $6 for Grubauer). There was a ton of value to the Avs in getting a cheaper goalie, in order to fill other holes on the team (2nd line left wing is a glaring hole right now). The Avs should be a better team this year with Kuemper @$3.5m and allocating that remaining cap room to holes, than if they signed the Grubauer deal.Why on Earth would Sakic not match Seattle on that offer instead of this? WHY? Someone please explain?
That package could have gotten them John Gibson. Would be shocked if the Ducks refused that offer.
Gotta think cap is the reason here. Gibson would have been better, and a long term solution, but his cap hit would have been almost 3 million more.
I guess Sakic decided that the extra 3 million to work with this year was more valuable than Gibson's added performance and the value of him being signed for so much longer (assuming that offer would have even gotten Gibson).
I don't necessarily agree with the decision, but I at least get the logic.