I'll give you thachuk.
Batherson is getting worse
Chabot is nights and day different from the beginning of DJs tenure till now. He's worse than he was before
Norris in his first season in the NHL scored 17 goals in 56 games, DJ didn't teach him how to do that in his first year
Stutzle is a franchise C. He can get coached by anyone and still be good
Debrincat was brought into do one thing, we f***ing dont give him the same set up the has allowed to put up those goals.
Our shit players like Zaitsev had to pried away from DJs cold dead hands while Brann needed the development
This guy stinks.
Batherson was coming off a major injury, the first of his career, and it was an injury that they said could take 10 months before he started feeling 100% again. I'm lenient on him because of this after an admittedly disappointing season. You should be too.
Chabot has had his responsibility increased with every season. We need to see how he will look with much more support around him next season. There's no denying he's consistently been our best defender since DJ took over, whether that's due to a lack of competition or not, dmen with higher draft pedigree than Chabot have busted at the NHL. Chabot has not.
I think it's ridiculous to not give any credit to DJ for developing Norris and Stützle, completely irrational and clearly the sign of someone with a huge bias. Jon Cooper specifically mentioned how well DJ did developing Stützle in the NHL, and I'm sure he knows a bit more about player development than you or I.
DJ didn't cause DeBrincat to miss about 20 open nets this year. It's on the players to finish their chances, especially an established goal scorer like DeBrincat.
Brannstrom looks better than ever and DJ has routinely played him up in the lineup when players go down with injuries. He clearly trusts Brannstrom (I really don't care how you respond to this, there were some games where Brannstrom led or was at least 2nd in TOI among dmen. That doesn't happen to young defensemen if the coach doesn't trust them) and elected for a slow burn approach to his development, that seems to be paying off. Not sure what the complaint is here.
You can have your whipping boy, but at least attempt to give credit where credit is due. It's actually a poor debate tactic to ignore the legitimate pros of something you're not in favor for. Instead you should be making the argument that despite DJ's success with player development, Ottawa is now at the stage where they need to transition into being a playoff team, and that requires a different skillset that DJ might not possess. That at least would be somewhat of a convincing argument, rather than trying to argue he actually has not done a good job at player development.