Beech
Registered User
- Nov 25, 2020
- 3,280
- 1,163
you know that; that is my personal belief.. one day, you will be exposed CJ.crap, you've uncovered my secret identity...
you know that; that is my personal belief.. one day, you will be exposed CJ.crap, you've uncovered my secret identity...
Zone break out, they need to stop using the bank pass so much. Players cannot get it cleanly which results a lot of icing and broken plays. I want to see more support on the break out as five man unit. In the neutral zone, try more cross ice passes to open up space to grain zone entry with control.Which strategies and what game management would you like to see improve.
The bank pass, stretch pass is to make a D backup to protect their zone.Zone break out, they need to stop using the bank pass so much. Players cannot get it cleanly which results a lot of icing and broken plays. I want to see more support on the break out as five man unit. In the neutral zone, try more cross ice passes to open up space to grain zone entry with control.
I agree. He has had to manage the team with Dorion's roster. DJ has one year left on his contract so I would keep him for now until we get a new GM in place. The new GM can then hire his own scouts, coaches, development staff, etc. If the new GM wants DJ gone before his announcemnt, so be it.I don’t mind the idea of DJ staying.
He’s been given the worst rosters, with the worst luck. A coach can only do so much.
If he’s a scapegoat for Dorion, it’s an absolute gong-show.
Coaches get grey hair watching cross ice passes, those are also the ones where we see the most breakaways going the wrong way which explains coaches drinking Peto-Bismol like it's water.Zone break out, they need to stop using the bank pass so much. Players cannot get it cleanly which results a lot of icing and broken plays. I want to see more support on the break out as five man unit. In the neutral zone, try more cross ice passes to open up space to grain zone entry with control.
I think the Fs leaving the zone early is a strategy we see a lot of teams using, remember the NHL is a copycat league. Once the drop pass was introduced every team started using it. We saw M. Tkachuk & Stone do it a lot during the playoffs, it's another way to get the puck out of the zone since it forces the D on that side to back up taking him out of the offensive zone. Sometimes it works & sometimes it doesn't but it's clearly another strategy being deployed by teams.I want to see better tighter defensive play in our D zone by the forwards, instead of seeing them watching the puck a lot from the slot. D zone coverage is really bad and the Fs leaving the zone before the Ds get puck possession must stop.
Which strategies and what game management would you like to see improve.
82 games played, 86 points, 261 goals for, 271 goals against.. out of the playoffs.I think the Fs leaving the zone early is a strategy we see a lot of teams using, remember the NHL is a copycat league. Once the drop pass was introduced every team started using it. We saw M. Tkachuk & Stone do it a lot during the playoffs, it's another way to get the puck out of the zone since it forces the D on that side to back up taking him out of the offensive zone. Sometimes it works & sometimes it doesn't but it's clearly another strategy being deployed by teams.
Exactly & they are not the far off. They may lose some scoring with DBC leaving but Norris could make up for most of it. If he is not moved & starts the season here & plays with Norris & Batherson they could take off as a line. One of the reasons I want them to get bigger on D specifically the 3rd pairing is to cut down on goals against & clearly they need a little more help from the forwards but it's really goaltending that needs to improve dramatically with a clear #1 who is stable & healthy.82 games played, 86 points, 261 goals for, 271 goals against.. out of the playoffs.
strategy is great, results are needed.
Calgary is the only team with a positive goal differential that missed the playoffs. No team with a negative differential made the playoffs.
only the Florida panthers had more goals against and got into the playoffs
3 teams had a lower goals for and got in, but those 3 teams had a way better goals against.
so.. play better, score a few more goals, give up a few less goals.
Coaching... DJ and company.
So you got nothing, just using words to make it sound good. Thanks.They've been covered ad nauseum. If you don't see the deficiencies with this team 5v5, PK, and even PP to a certain extent over the past few seasons, I don't know what to tell you.
How many of those playoff teams had their #7 goalie start a game for them?82 games played, 86 points, 261 goals for, 271 goals against.. out of the playoffs.
strategy is great, results are needed.
Calgary is the only team with a positive goal differential that missed the playoffs. No team with a negative differential made the playoffs.
only the Florida panthers had more goals against and got into the playoffs
3 teams had a lower goals for and got in, but those 3 teams had a way better goals against.
so.. play better, score a few more goals, give up a few less goals.
Coaching... DJ and company.
I get you..How many of those playoff teams had their #7 goalie start a game for them?
Empty net goals against 14 and 6 for. So a -8.I get you..
but the primitive data (not advanced analytics).. suggest that a mere 5-10 goals-for more and ideally about 10-15 goals less against would have gotten them in.
that needed to be squeezed out.. coaching.
It is incredible how the most basic stat of Goal-differential is the truest indicator of entry or missing the playoffs.
there is probably more to your point than what I am seeing.Empty net goals against 14 and 6 for. So a -8.
Top team Rangers +1 differential, worst team SJ and ST Louis -17.
Yep need to improve like you said though.
It was more agreeing with you , and adding an fyi.there is probably more to your point than what I am seeing.
I agree; however, sometimes two Fs leave the zone and the team does not have puck possession, resulting in increased shots against and GA. I think the D zone play needs to be tightened up.I think the Fs leaving the zone early is a strategy we see a lot of teams using, remember the NHL is a copycat league. Once the drop pass was introduced every team started using it. We saw M. Tkachuk & Stone do it a lot during the playoffs, it's another way to get the puck out of the zone since it forces the D on that side to back up taking him out of the offensive zone. Sometimes it works & sometimes it doesn't but it's clearly another strategy being deployed by teams.
It’s timing, defensive skill, and assumptions.I agree; however, sometimes two Fs leave the zone and the team does not have puck possession, resulting in increased shots against and GA. I think the D zone play needs to be tightened up.
It’s timing, defensive skill, and assumptions.
You have to expect your D to be able to do his part, because you’re trying to the get the jump on the D man you’re bursting past.
Problem for us is our D struggles to make the play, and the Forward was already jumping without us actually having control.
I feel like experience and skill can make this play effective. When it works for us it looks glorious.
Obviously we need a few tools in the bag to switch it up sometimes, we need better execution, and we need forwards faster to adapt when the play fails.
I think there are several reasons for the poor D zone play: One is the players who do not all have the required skillsets to beat the opponents, players who focus on offence rather than defensive play (because scoring players get paid more), coaching (for the on-ice strategy and not holding players accountable), GM (for nor acquiring better players), and owner (for not paying salaries to the cap ceiling to get better players).It's not strategy or coaching. It's execution and that's on the players on the ice. Our guys just weren't good enough last season. Goaltending and injuries were a big part why we missed. I would argue coaching was the only reason we were still in contention in the last few weeks.
IDK ... most owners care about the finances moreso than the players, they pay the experts to take care of the players & the product on the ice. If the product hurts the finances than I would expect that the experts would make changes before the owner has to step in. Owners are schmusing with the rich advertisers & politicians in the city & doing PR work in their suites. EM usually had suits in his suite & was always talking to them until he knew he would be on camera.I think there are several reasons for the poor D zone play: One is the players who do not all have the required skillsets to beat the opponents, players who focus on offence rather than defensive play (because scoring players get paid more), coaching (for the on-ice strategy and not holding players accountable), GM (for nor acquiring better players), and owner (for not paying salaries to the cap ceiling to get better players).
I expect the new ownership will start to address these issues oncde he is in control.