Trade: [CLE/HOU] Deshaun Watson (signs 5 years, $230M) and 2024 5th for 2022, 2023, and 2024 1sts, 2023 3rd, 2024 4th

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,164
21,360
Toronto
I'm talking about the guaranteed money amount. Going 80 million above the previous record is a huge commitment and not necessarily the precedent other owners want in future labor and CBA negotiations.
We've already seen fully guaranteed deals, so they didn't really break an unwritten rule, if that rule was broken, it was broken in 2018 with Cousins. Cousins, Brady, and Rodgers's deals are also fully guaranteed. Hell, DeAndre Hopkins's current deal is written in such a way it is practically 100% guaranteed.
 

DougieSmash

WE'RE IN! WE'RE IN! YES! YES! WOO!
Jan 2, 2009
14,795
15,968
While Watson is really good, I just don't think he's better than Burrow. Not to mention than healthy Ravens are better team. So, I guess this will be your typical era of Browns football. I don't expect much from them even with Deshaun.
 

Troy McClure

Suter will never be scratched
Mar 12, 2002
48,486
16,539
South of Heaven
We've already seen fully guaranteed deals, so they didn't really break an unwritten rule, if that rule was broken, it was broken in 2018 with Cousins. Cousins, Brady, and Rodgers's deals are also fully guaranteed. Hell, DeAndre Hopkins's current deal is written in such a way it is practically 100% guaranteed.
Good QBs are pretty much getting guaranteed contacts going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

Unholy Diver

Registered User
Oct 13, 2002
19,750
3,522
in the midnight sea
I'm talking about the guaranteed money amount. Going 80 million above the previous record is a huge commitment and not necessarily the precedent other owners want in future labor and CBA negotiations.


The contract and guarantees were always a part of it, the reason the Panthers were dropped from the list was their unwillingness to guarantee the 3rd & 4th years of the contract he already had
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
28,124
10,804
Good QBs are pretty much getting guaranteed contacts going forward.
With future cap hits so high like Cousins at $45 mill this upcoming season until he restructured it and talks about Ryan doing the same, the QB can always get new money added into the contract to help the team kick future cap hits down the line.

Cousins just got another $35 mill guaranteed added onto his contract. So QBs will always get their money. A little surprised that money ended up being a big deciding factor for him.
 

Troy McClure

Suter will never be scratched
Mar 12, 2002
48,486
16,539
South of Heaven
Are they though? Rodgers is the only other one to get everything guaranteed and even in that it’s not fully guaranteed.
Kirk Cousins has his fully guaranteed. Brady's Tampa money has all been fully guaranteed.

And for the other QBs, if you look at them the percentage of the contracts that are fully guaranteed keeps going up and up. Stafford's new deal is mostly guaranteed.

We're heading in the direction of more contracts looking like this.
 

hatterson

Registered User
Apr 12, 2010
35,971
13,569
North Tonawanda, NY
Kirk Cousins has his fully guaranteed. Brady's Tampa money has all been fully guaranteed.

And for the other QBs, if you look at them the percentage of the contracts that are fully guaranteed keeps going up and up. Stafford's new deal is mostly guaranteed.

We're heading in the direction of more contracts looking like this.

Brady and Cousins are older QBs on very short (1 or 2 year deals). No one has signed a long term deal, especially a big money deal, that is fully guaranteed, especially not right at signing.

Generally the trend has been the longer the contract the less that’s guaranteed. The Watson contract broke that mould. 4 year deals for too guys (stafford, Prescott, Wilson) have had 75-80% guaranteed. 5 year deals (Carr, Garoppolo, Ryan) have had more in the range of 60-70% guaranteed.

Watson went to 5 years and also fully guaranteed it (versus a practical guarantee like “on the roster next year”). It’s very much an aberration of a contract
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dubi Doo

hatterson

Registered User
Apr 12, 2010
35,971
13,569
North Tonawanda, NY
So the Browns claim they did “extensive investigative, legal and reference work” as part of the Watson trade…but didn’t provide any details on that and also didn’t speak to any of the women accusing him of anything nor did they speak to the lawyer representing them. So I’m a tad skeptical of how extensive this work was.
 

SirClintonPortis

ProudCapitalsTraitor
Mar 9, 2011
18,654
4,482
Maryland native
So the Browns claim they did “extensive investigative, legal and reference work” as part of the Watson trade…but didn’t provide any details on that and also didn’t speak to any of the women accusing him of anything nor did they speak to the lawyer representing them. So I’m a tad skeptical of how extensive this work was.
Maybe he just promised to stick to strippers and places where the rub-and-tug are clearly consensual(Plenty of sites offering that and more).
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
41,359
21,668
Correct. Look at Vick, he got a 2nd max contract after he was released from jail.

Especially when it comes to in demand positions like QB



& this is their new franchise guy.

Would like to think there will be lots of booing
 

John Price

Gang Gang
Sep 19, 2008
381,111
28,633
the amount of hot dogging and grand standing by "browns fans" over this is confusing

if memory serves me correct Watson was not convicted by a grand jury

so what is the problem here, why is there so much outrage from Browns faithful on this. The judicial system found him not guilty and the NFL has cleared him to play
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
41,677
18,235
Mulberry Street
the amount of hot dogging and grand standing by "browns fans" over this is confusing

if memory serves me correct Watson was not convicted by a grand jury

so what is the problem here, why is there so much outrage from Browns faithful on this. The judicial system found him not guilty and the NFL has cleared him to play

Society as a whole is happier to see someone fail than see someone succeed.
 

John Price

Gang Gang
Sep 19, 2008
381,111
28,633
Society as a whole is happier to see someone fail than see someone succeed.
the legal system literally vindicated him of any harm which is why the NFL freed him up to be traded

the legal system works. And then people want to complain and root against him?

Oh well. The same with Vick too who served his time and then people still hated him. "HE MUST BE INCARCERATED FOR LIFE!"
 

Troy McClure

Suter will never be scratched
Mar 12, 2002
48,486
16,539
South of Heaven
the legal system literally vindicated him of any harm which is why the NFL freed him up to be traded

the legal system works. And then people want to complain and root against him?

Oh well. The same with Vick too who served his time and then people still hated him. "HE MUST BE INCARCERATED FOR LIFE!"
No, the legal system didn't vindicate him. A grand jury decided not to press charges. We don't know why, but it's probably because every one of these situations had no recording and no other witness. These situations are very difficult to prosecute.
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
190,889
42,393
Correct. Look at Vick, he got a 2nd max contract after he was released from jail.

Especially when it comes to in demand positions like QB


That was also Vick’s second contract after returning to the league, not first. His play, and work, got him that deal. Not because teams were tripping over each other to get him.
 

SirClintonPortis

ProudCapitalsTraitor
Mar 9, 2011
18,654
4,482
Maryland native
No, the legal system didn't vindicate him. A grand jury decided not to press charges. We don't know why, but it's probably because every one of these situations had no recording and no other witness. These situations are very difficult to prosecute.
It's also why the restraining order(or other equivalent terms like protective order, peace order here in MD) exist. Because there are precisely situations where only testimony exist but not hard evidence. They are also "civil" cases but taken seriously in criminal events(don't want to get political, but I will mention Daunte Wright had a restraining order in his history).

Now, that doesn't mean restraining orders can't be used by parties in bad faith; likely many of the stories that make it to court are for other intended "business" reasons. But if the filing is granted, the system treats the testimony as fact.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad