rt
Clean Hits on Substack
All faceoffs are not created equal. I get that. But there are no stats tracked for how good Lundell or anyone else is on “big” faceoffs. And I get that a clean loss is worse than an a 50/50. But again, that’s not tracked. For all I know Lundell only loses close ones and only the least important of them.I mean, sure -- but if you're taking defensive draws (which Lundell is) and if you end up losing the draw clean (no idea if this is happening) then you're likely giving up a high danger scoring chance. An extra high danger scoring chance per game means an extra goal against every 5 or 6 games which adds up over a season and / or playoff run.
I'm not trying to argue faceoffs are the most important thing in the world, but there's a reason all of the top defensive centers (Bergeron, Toews, ROR etc) are great on draws, they do matter. There's a reason Crosby spent his first few offseasons working on his faceoffs until he got to about 55%... and at the same time there's, no reason Lundell can't also work on his faceoffs and get better (incidentally Barkov did something similar). But to say faceoffs are completely irrelevant is not correct.
Either way, I would agree they are not as important as the other stuff you mentioned, esp for a 20 year old who can / should get better at them with time
My actual point is that a statistic showing a center as being 45% on FOs versus 51% on FOs doesn’t really matter much without context. And even with as much context as is available, it probably still doesn’t matter much.
Those high-level, broadest stroke FO% numbers even at a team level have proven to be fairly insignificant when it comes to game outcomes, IIRC.
Once again, I know that huge faceoffs are huge. I do follow the sport pretty closely, lol. I just glancing at a stat line that says FOW:45% and taking that to be a red-flag is pretty misguided. That’s all. And I’m sure you agree.