It's amazing what he does with a healthy center
It's all in his head. That should be blatantly obvious.
When it's crunch time, he (typically) turns up the volume. That is both great and infuriating.
That's fair. But again, he is still very young. He can still find a way to be in sync over the coarse of a regular season.I think Kreider has struggled to find a way to be "in sync" for a full season.
but Backes and Kreider are nothing alike aside from being males with large frames.
Power forwards in the nhl, it's rare any two players worth a damn are exactly alike anyway. More often than not characteristics are being compared, that should not imply the players are exact replucas.
And I'm not comparing their style, more their roles.
Backes is a defensively deployed center while Kreider plays (in theory) a simple straight line game. Backes' game is a lot more refined than Kreider's and Kreider has known what he needs to do to generate offense since he was a rookie.
I agree with you, but you can make an argument that Kreider's first three full seasons in the NHL have been better than Ladd's first three or four seasons.
My issue with Kreids is if the team starts paying for potential rather than what his actual production is. That and it's possible all that talk about being a dirty player/goalie killer/whatever has neutered his physical game a bit. I hate the cliche of keep things simple and hit everything in sight but I think it really applies to him.
Yeah I'm not comparing them right now, Backes was a winger early on, I'm comparing them at 24 years old, do not see what I'm doing?
Weren't people comparing Kreider to Knuble a couple of months back? Kreider is vastly outscoring him at the current age, since Knuble didn't really start scoring until he was 28/29. I think silverfish made a comparison scoring wise to John LeClair, and so far it looks pretty accurate.
I highly doubt he'll turn into a 80-90 point winger in his prime, but he could easily be a 65-70 point player if he can consistently play how he has been recently. This is the Kreider we all expect to see, the one who hustles, initiates contact, and torches defenders with size and speed.
this is where expectations get dangerous. this does not mean what it meant even a couple seasons ago. this is the dead puck era. people have been underrating the fact that in a clearly down year personally Krieder has matched his scoring rate from a season ago while the league continues to get more difficult to score in. a 45 point winger with Kreider's size and speed is a very valuable asset.
In a down year, the kid still scored. Yes, he does need to take a step forward and become a 25-30 goal scorer. But that is well within the realm of possibility.Oh I know that it's an unrealistic expectation because Kreider has a penchant to have cold streaks that span 10-15 games. I was projecting that number based on him playing how he has played recently on a consistent basis.
In a down year, the kid still scored. Yes, he does need to take a step forward and become a 25-30 goal scorer. But that is well within the realm of possibility.
These kind of kids do not grow on trees.
If I'm not mistaken, the Rangers had five of their former first round picks in the lineup the other night.
Staal (05), Kreider (09), McIlrath (10), Miller (11) and Skjei (12).
Not sure if that's ever happened before on this team.
Consisteny and confidence go a long way.