Really weird question. I don't know anything about the subject of general Russian intelligence so I'm not going to say anything and look like an ass.
Worst post you've ever seen? Did you literally just join before posting this?
Yeah no. It's not relevant especially for this forum which is extremely male dominated and is not an accurate representation of the hockey community. Even if gender were relevant a group made up almost entirely of men who are uneducated in the subject talking about gender in hockey makes as much sense as those same men talking about pregnancy.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion and is allowed to speak it as long as they stay to the TOS agreement yeah that's pretty obvious. The more advanced a subject though the less the opinion of your average person matters. Anything biological/medical I'm not going to an average person for their opinion. I'll listen and then I'll go find someone who is actually educated in the subject to know the truth. Y'all are welcome to continue talking about an irrelevant subject in a thread, everyone else is also entitled to their opinions about the discussion featuring people who have not proven to have studied in the field and have any sort of higher education related to it. The dangerous sentiment is believing the average person's opinion is just as valid as someone who actually does work in the field and when making an argument of authority yeah it kind of matters in this instance considering the amount work you have to go through to thoroughly understand these type of topics. That or you're really overestimating the education you get in high school.
This should be relatively easy to find out the answer though right? Just find a large sample size of girl and boy hockey players who all receive the same amount of funding, development, opportunities, same social challenges, and we'll know if it's possible or why it's not. You control for all those factors and there will be no more doubts.
I stand corrected, only in that you decided to write a worse post.
There are two parts to the argument here. The biological and the social.
The biological is accepted science and really not up for much debate. The academic findings are backed up by imperical & anecdotal evidence. It's a objective fact.
The second part is social and certainly more subjective. Values and opinions matter in this area.
My and other people opinion is that not separating the sports by gender does a disservice to women. I would prefer strong independent women's sports leagues where women that can be celebrated in there own right rather then being fringe within male leagues.
The obvious market for that to happen with is female fans. Happy for limited supports from governments and existing sports leagues for that to happen but not sure it ever really will. Not a huge fan of social engineering so that is OK.
I hold the above opinions provisionally until a better argument is present. Same goes for the science but it is much more settled and unlikely to change.
You don't actually know anyone's gender on here and it shouldn't matter. In fact using the source of an argument against said argument is a logical fallacy.
If you disagree with the consensus science or think what is being said is not consensus, show alternatives.
If you disagree with people opinions, present better ones.