LeBrun: Chiarot likely to be dealt and return a 1st round pick

Sota Popinski

Registered Boozer
Sponsor
Apr 26, 2017
2,446
1,578
Minneapolis
OK, 2 weeks ago
Chiarot likely to be dealt and return a 1st round pick

well Chiarot now TOPS the trade bait list , now expect a 1st + 3rd and who knows in 2 weeks who will offer even more.
Totally dude. The Habs rebuild is complete after the Eichel-like haul they are going to get for a half season of Chiarot
 

Kimota

ROY DU NORD!!!
Nov 4, 2005
40,008
15,176
Les Plaines D'Abraham
If he's the same player as he was on the Jets, I think a 2nd and small add should be the ceiling. He plays a playoff style game and can log big minutes though so a 1st makes sense

He's pretty different. He's been on our number one pairing, as shutdown pair with Weber for the next few years. When Bergevin was fired, he thanked him for giving him a chance to become a more important player and it improved his game. Last year he had more issues though(but he got better in the playoffs).
 

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,293
If Chiarot is getting a 1st round pick, If the Ducks can't sign Lindholm I guess we getting 3 1st round picks for him... Nice!!
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,781
27,844
East Coast
If Chiarot is getting a 1st round pick, If the Ducks can't sign Lindholm I guess we getting 3 1st round picks for him... Nice!!

Chiarot is a legit top 4D at this stage of his career. Lindholm is top pairing quality. Is that 3 times more value? :sarcasm:

To be honest, I think you "could" get a 1st and a prospect for Lindholm if he was available. But who's the say Chiarot gets a 1st for sure. I think it's a possibility but there are no guarantees

Lindholm > Chiarot.
* Interesting to note that there is 3 pts in the difference with Chiarot having more goals this year.
* Corsi about the same with Chiarot getting a substantial amount more D zone starts.

End result: Lindholm is not worth 3 times more than Chiarot.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: xxsciroccoxx

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,293
Chiarot is a legit top 4D at this stage of his career. Lindholm is top pairing quality. Is that 3 times more value? :sarcasm:

To be honest, I think you "could" get a 1st and a prospect for Lindholm if he was available. But who's the say Chiarot gets a 1st for sure. I think it's a possibility but there are no guarantees

Lindholm > Chiarot.
* Interesting to note that there is 3 pts in the difference with Chiarot having more goals this year.
* Corsi about the same with Chiarot getting a substantial amount more D zone starts.

End result: Lindholm is not worth 3 times more than Chiarot.
That's cool and all but Lindholm is one of the most underrated players in the entire NHL. He is playing with a 19 year old and



He won't get 3 firsts as a rental, no one ever has I was obviously joking but he is way way way more valuable than Chiarot.
 

DJN21

Registered User
Aug 8, 2011
9,946
3,248
Rochester
That's cool and all but Lindholm is one of the most underrated players in the entire NHL. He is playing with a 19 year old and



He won't get 3 firsts as a rental, no one ever has I was obviously joking but he is way way way more valuable than Chiarot.


Your point was clear to anyone who monitors actual hockey. Cheers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bsu

austin316

Registered User
Oct 4, 2016
1,432
1,714
Whoever gets Chiarot for the deadline will be very happy they have him on their team come playoff time. Guy is a warrior.
 

RC51

Registered User
Dec 10, 2005
4,951
807
mtl
Chiarot will bring a 1st + a 3rd or 2nd. and he will sign a 3 year extension at about 4 mil. MTL to sweeten the pot will retain 50%-60% till the end of the year. This is my guess.
 

pth2

Registered User
Jan 7, 2018
3,478
2,759
Chiarot will bring a 1st + a 3rd or 2nd. and he will sign a 3 year extension at about 4 mil. MTL to sweeten the pot will retain 50%-60% till the end of the year. This is my guess.
Quite possible.

I could see him go for a high-end prospect and a 2nd to a team planning on signing him, I'd try and make the 2nd become a 1st if the team wins a Cup, but that's just me.

And retention has a huge bonus of making his cap hit accessible to most teams, even more if we can take an expiring contract back. This means a lot of bidders, so better odds of getting the deal we want.
 

HabsQC

Registered User
Sep 27, 2008
5,838
5,762
Gatineau, Quebec
If Chiarot is getting a 1st round pick, If the Ducks can't sign Lindholm I guess we getting 3 1st round picks for him... Nice!!

Unfortunately you have to consider what teams are willing to pay. No one will pay 3 first for a rental, whoever it is
 

HabsWhiteKnightLOL

Registered User
Apr 29, 2017
36,548
48,726
Somewhere on earth in a hospital
The Habs won 24 of 56 games last season. In any other season they wouldn't have even sniffed the playoffs. Go ahead and pretend they were a good team though
As a habs fan I agree.
The canadian division was a joke. The fact we even had 7 teams only made us advance to the playoffs because we would have been out of the playoffs with 8 teams. 11 overtime lost were brutal.
Habs werent good at all during the regular season and mostly feed on overtime lost and early season vancouver to make playoffs by losing twice in OT in the last 2 games of the season.

Playoffs are Carey Price mostly once again

as for Chariot issue. at 50% he gets easily a 1st pick with the mentality of those GMs.
 

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,683
4,634
Pacific Northwest
Savard got a 1st and 3rd last year and Chiarot is twice the player Savard is

Now that is still not saying much but there’s market precedence
Honestly, Savard returned what he did last year because it was a seller's market and the list of available D-men was limited.

You can't really base value off of previous year's deadline unless the quantity and quality of available D-men is identical, which it never is.

Chiarot's value should be based on how many sellers there are at the deadline, and the quality of other defensemen that are on the block, not on what Savard got last season.
 

SakuKoivu11

Registered User
Jun 29, 2017
2,651
1,850
Honestly, Savard returned what he did last year because it was a seller's market and the list of available D-men was limited.

You can't really base value off of previous year's deadline unless the quantity and quality of available D-men is identical, which it never is.

Chiarot's value should be based on how many sellers there are at the deadline, and the quality of other defensemen that are on the block, not on what Savard got last season.

Sounds about right.
It depends who’s available at the deadline and if there is a bidding war.

if a few teams have injuries or like to add more depth before the playoffs they will put bid. It’s supply and demands.

Tatar did get a 1st, 2nd and 3rd.
At minimum Chariot will get a first and a prospect and the maximum someone will give a 1st, 2nd and prospect.
 

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,683
4,634
Pacific Northwest
Sounds about right.
It depends who’s available at the deadline and if there is a bidding war.

if a few teams have injuries or like to add more depth before the playoffs they will put bid. It’s supply and demands.

Tatar did get a 1st, 2nd and 3rd.
At minimum Chariot will get a first and a prospect and the maximum someone will give a 1st, 2nd and prospect.
True, but Tatar was 3 years younger and still had 3 and a half years of term left on his contract, and that trade was not generally seen as good value.

Chiarot is going to be a 31 year old UFA rental. Unless Montreal is taking back a cap dump with term, I don't think he returns a first. We will eventually see I suppose. :popcorn:
 

SakuKoivu11

Registered User
Jun 29, 2017
2,651
1,850
True, but Tatar was 3 years younger and still had 3 and a half years of term left on his contract, and that trade was not generally seen as good value.

Chiarot is going to be a 31 year old UFA rental. Unless Montreal is taking back a cap dump with term, I don't think he returns a first. We will eventually see I suppose. :popcorn:

from what I can tell Chariot is that typical playoff defensive defenseman a contender wants.

he’s big 6’4” 220, skates very well, can play a shut down role, kills penalties and produce I think he’s got 5-6 goals which is top 5 goals for defensemen. There’s not many players like him available at the deadline. Teams rather pay than play against him.

for the sake of value I give an example. NYR would love to add Chariot to play with Fox. Most likely a first round pick, and maybe a prospect like Zac Jones. Maybe a conditional pick of Chariot resigns. Something along that line.
 

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,683
4,634
Pacific Northwest
from what I can tell Chariot is that typical playoff defensive defenseman a contender wants.

he’s big 6’4” 220, skates very well, can play a shut down role, kills penalties and produce I think he’s got 5-6 goals which is top 5 goals for defensemen. There’s not many players like him available at the deadline. Teams rather pay than play against him.

for the sake of value I give an example. NYR would love to add Chariot to play with Fox. Most likely a first round pick, and maybe a prospect like Zac Jones. Maybe a conditional pick of Chariot resigns. Something along that line.

Get ready to get flamed from Bern :laugh:

For me, Chiarot feels like the typical 2 2nds candidate.

But like we said before, it is really going to depend on what else is available that will ultimately dictate the value of rentals this season.

The problem with expecting a first is that several teams have already moved their firsts for 2022, and the teams that are holding them are not going to be interested in moving them for rentals. I don't expect more than 4 firsts to move this deadline, and a couple of those are likely going to go for forwards. Then add the fact that there will likely be several UFA D men available, and I don't really expect values to be as high as they have been in the past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archijerej

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad