Toggle sidebar

Line Combos: CBJ Roster Discussion/Line Combos/Injury Report (Voronkov returns)

Jovavic

Jovavic

Concept of a Plan
Oct 13, 2002
15,700
3,385
New Born Citizen Erased
Utah has some defensemen out long term and word is they're calling around for help and kicked tires on Provorov. I think it's a likely spot for him to go, new market and the owner will be aggressive to be successful in their first year.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,679
32,787
If it's just a pick on offer then I don't think we bite, better to make a deal at the deadline. But if they're offering a youngish roster forward like Maccelli, I'd kick the tires on that. I bring up Maccelli because he's like a spare forward for them. Small playmaker, doesn't shoot but racks up a ton of assists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Napoli, thebus88, ThirdPeriodTurtle and 1 other person
alphafox

alphafox

Registered User
Jun 14, 2011
1,441
91
SteelCityCannon said:
I feel like it would send a pretty shit message to the room if we sold in October at 3-3. If it's a hockey trade who knows though.
Click to expand...
Agreed, I think the real question is how much does management think the coach can keep players focused on improving effort and developing skill. Management is facing the most difficult season any management team has ever faced in my opinion and the question is how much can you do this season to set the team up for success in 2026 and beyond. Barring an unbelievably good offer (i.e. unprotected 1st, 1st rd pick +) I think you have to wait until TDL just to maintain some continuity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclones Rock and Double-Shift Lasse
ThirdPeriodTurtle

ThirdPeriodTurtle

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 13, 2022
2,491
1,832
Finland
majormajor said:
If it's just a pick on offer then I don't think we bite, better to make a deal at the deadline. But if they're offering a youngish roster forward like Maccelli, I'd kick the tires on that. I bring up Maccelli because he's like a spare forward for them. Small playmaker, doesn't shoot but racks up a ton of assists.
Click to expand...
Words straight out of my mouth - I'd love to get Maccelli on the CBJ. And not just because of the obvious Finnish connection lol.

Provorov for Maccelli straight up. The team would be so fun to watch with Maccelli. He's such a fun player with a high hockey IQ and superb passing. I haven't watched him enough to know if he's got defensive issues or if plays die on his stick more often than the highlights show, but he's exciting offensively. Maybe I'd even throw in a small sweetener, Maccelli has one more year after this (but at 3.5M or so, he's already getting paid quite a bit and isn't some super great value deal as such).

Realistically we should probably just ride this team for a little while longer, they've played really well all things considered. But I'd love a Provorov for Maccelli trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Napoli

NotCommitted

Registered User
Jul 4, 2013
3,039
4,236
Makes no sense to trade Provorov now unless they get the kind of offer I doubt they will. Situation might be way different near TDL.
 

EDM

Registered User
Mar 8, 2008
6,273
2,065
I really do not see the point of trading Provorov at this time. I think it would really undercut the current mojo that we have. They are playing tough, competitive hockey. Ttrading Provorov at this point would really be pulling the rug out from under them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viqsi, VT and CannonFire1

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,679
32,787
ViD said:
I don’t see Utah trading promising young players for a rental
Click to expand...

It really only works if they get the acquisition to extend. It looks like a team that is taking big steps so I wouldn't rule out guys extending there.
 
VT

VT

Registered User
Jan 24, 2021
7,638
4,092
Slovakia
I really don't see any reason why we should take Macelli, and trade Provorov at all. Finally starting to show his potential, the Werenski, Provorov pair is playing great, guys are adding to each other and we have to trade him?
 
  • Like
Reactions: majormajor

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,679
32,787
VT said:
I really don't see any reason why we should take Macelli, and trade Provorov at all. Finally starting to show his potential, the Werenski, Provorov pair is playing great, guys are adding to each other and we have to trade him?
Click to expand...

My thinking was that it gives us someone who fits better long term and helps the short term depth crisis at forward. But the way Provorov is playing, and the way our top D weave with our forwards, Provorov might be more impactful.

koteka said:
If his first name was Luca, I would be all over adding Macelli. We could have

Luca Del Bel Belluz
Luca Marrelli
Luca Pinelli
Adam Fantilli’s brother Luca Fantilli

and then we would have Luca Macelli. But Macelli’s first name is Matias so we don’t want him.
Click to expand...

I wonder how long it took all the Italian families in Ontario to realize they were all picking the same distinctive baby name.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: koteka and Cyclones Rock
koteka

koteka

Registered User
Jan 1, 2017
4,420
4,776
Central Ohio
majormajor said:
I wonder how long it took all the Italian families in Ontario to realize they were all picking the same distinctive baby name.
Click to expand...

They are kind of limited. You can’t name a kid Mario or Luigi anymore. Benito hasn’t been used since the 40s. What’s left? Romeo? Salvatore? Vito? I am hoping for a generation of Italian-Canadian hockey players named Vito.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ThirdPeriodTurtle
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X