Doggy
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2011
- 3,736
- 2,861
I think you are seeing more and more high end prospects going the NCAA route...specifically over the last 5-10 years. Perhaps one of the reasons players choose NCAAs over the CHL has to do with the ability to jump to the pros when ready as opposed to being locked in to the CHL until you are 20 (or ready for the NHL with no allowance for a developmental step for the player). Even if the player doesn't make the jump from NCAA to AHL, playing against 19-22 years olds in NCAA might be better preparation for the pros than playing against 16-19 year olds.Why? How will letting the best players leave get more money, recognition, or anything for CHL teams? It might be in 3-5 players best interest every year, but I can’t see how it makes the CHL better to lose stars and gate revenue. Maybe you could devise a buyout structure where and NHL team can buy out a player for $2 million or something, and that could help the CHL. But without compensation you are just hurting the CHL teams.
Not just the Canadian kids who come south but the top American kids who decide to stay home instead of going north to the CHL. Don't you think the CHL would have loved to see Adam Fantilli play three years in the OHL rather than two in the USHL and one in NCAAs? Maybe he goes that route regardless but maybe not.
So maybe the CHL holds 3-5 players captive for an extra year...but maybe they lose 3-5 players for several years to another developmental route by enforcing this rule. It could go either way.