Bruce Granville
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2014
- 5,918
- 4,629
Nah, goalies should and come into the NHL when they are ready no matter what the age, they all take a different path, they won't play him if the team isn't good, they might bury Petersen in the minors since he has a big contract too, the avg. age for a goalie starting to play in the NHL is probably 26.He will be 24 when season starts. 2 years SHL, 1 yr AHL, 12 NHL games.
got to start playing before he gets too old…
they will play him, pretty sure of that, with or without Hart as they are not looking to compete now.
The Kings 1st rounder (#22) was actually owned by Columbus already. It was part of the Jonathan Quick trade to Columbus near the deadline. Columbus then re-traded Quick to Vegas the next day.When you break it out like this, it looks like a steal for CBJ to me. They basically give up a 2nd round pick and some AHL depth for a solid Top-4D? That's a steal imo.
Kings are basically coughing up most of the value in this deal, and doing so just to dump Petersen. While even retaining on Provorov to make his contract even more attractive.
Funny that in today's flat cap NHL, it continues to be more expensive to dump bad contracts, than it is to acquire solid players (if you have cap space for them).
I'd argue that's a terrible outcome. It would mean their goal of making the playoffs clearly failed, and they punted assets while delaying their turn-around. The Romanov deal was awful (and I said so at the time). No comparison to this.
You can look at a team like Buffalo that improved organically. I think they are more the template of a team ready to start "buying" to get in the playoffs and potentially contend.
I like where CBJ are going.
Yeah, but is adding Provorov (who I don't think is that good) going to make CBJ a playoff team? Otherwise, what's the point? Could just save the assets and make a move when they're farther down the line and ready to compete, more like where Buffalo is now.
Who plays in nets?
All told?Jesus Christ, how many things are Columbus giving in this?
Rookie goalies average age is 26?Nah, goalies should and come into the NHL when they are ready no matter what the age, they all take a different path, they won't play him if the team isn't good, they might bury Petersen in the minors since he has a big contract too, the avg. age for a goalie starting to play in the NHL is probably 26.
Got rid of a lot of dead weight. Created a lot of cap. Lost Grans which doesn’t matter because of RHD depth, and a 2nd. The 2nd hurts but it allows us to re-sign Gavrikov. This is a win in kings fans eyes…Looks bad for Kings from my initial look at the pieces.
Nice first move for Danny Briere, don't really love it for CBJ or LAK. Least Blake got Petersen's deal off the books because yeah, that one was ugly.
He will when Werenski goes on IR yet again...Well, then he's doomed to fail here. He's not going to be top pair or PP in Columbus with Werenski at 1LD and Boqvist on PP1 and Jiricek ostensibly NHL-ready.
How exactly is he not very good ? He was not very good in a terrible team, most d men would look horrible in a team with no working system. He was very good during better Flyers years to a point where he was considered a borderline 1D
Even at 30% retained, Peterson easily wipes out the value of Grans and the 2nd. Walker and a very late 1st for Provorov is okayish.
Before the trade LA only had about $7.5m to sign Vilardi, Kupari, Bjornfot, JAD, and resign Gavrikov or a Top4 LHD UFA. The retention on Provorov actually doesn't hurt the Kings. Moving Petersen and Walker cleared $7.65m then subtract the $2m on Provorov and you're looking around $5.6m open cap to the $7.5m already they had to total $13.1m to use.Thanks! He was the main question mark I had regarding value (and to a lower extent Walker). I get that their RD situation might be overloaded, but youd think that they'd get more value out of a solid prospect than gaining a few M of cap space.
I agree it seems like LA got the least out of the 3 teams, especially since they're retaining on Provorov ( why ???).
Yes but they got less than market value. Chicago and now Philadelphia are taking less than Arizona has traditionally for this type of cash. It was bound to happen as more players entered the game.Hence why I said "consistently realize his potential." He hasn't been very good in a few seasons. Maybe the change of scenery helps him recover his game but his play has been on a downward trajectory for awhile, and it seems like he has attitude issues to boot. Not a good recipe.
Not really. They have cap space and they're rebuilding. By the time they need the cap space Petersen will be off the books and they'll still have the assets they acquired to take on a temporary bill.
Awkward for him because he isn't there now either.Povorov will fit right in in the middle of the bible belt.
I won't be holding my breath.I mean you know how it works in Columbus, our PP will suck again and Babcock will shuffle the units. If Provorov proves to be producing as a PP QB, so be it
Not really. A Gavrikov replacement - a solid LD to play behind Werenski on the second pair - was always something we were going to want so that the kids can be eased in rather than rushed. We just happen to be further along in the rebuild process than most assume because nobody really noticed - or remembered noticing - our prior steps through that process up until we became a Bedard contender.Is Columbus pushing their chips in here?
Sorry @Sol. I knew it was one of our regular contributors and posters. Thought it was you. My bad.Who was I obsessed with? I don’t care about Grans and Walker. What are you talking about? My only anger is not with this trade in particular but the pattern of our recent trades. Blake has become far too reactionary and is making moves to save his ass. The kings are trading picks like candy and have nothing to show for it. That’s a huge problem. The Kings have won 6 play off games since the cup win. Now they are trading picks in a deep draft for issues created by Blake. The trade is fine but this takes the Kings no where yet again. Maybe you’re just obsessed with mediocrity.
Eh... Columbus is close enough.Awkward for him because he isn't there now either.
The Canadian border is closer.Eh... Columbus is close enough.