This is baffling asset management by Nashville. I just don't get it.
Claimed off Waivers: [CBJ] Blue Jackets claim D Dante Fabbro off waivers from the Predators
- Thread starter Filthy Dangles
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
herzausstein
Registered User
Who needs a rebuild when waiving the perpetually pressboxed dman will lead the team to glory? We've already beaten Utah since the waiver. Clearly Fabbro was pressbox poison.So the rebuild begins in Nashville.
*yes this is sarcasm
mattihp
Registered User
Tolvanen was weird, this was weirder.
- Oct 23, 2014
- 30,327
- 43,009
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Source? I tried to figure it based off of the CBA rules and it looked like three times that many teams to me.
Waivers is Standings in Reverse Order. On the 9th the order would have been something around 1 SJS, 2 MTL, 3 ANA, 4 CHI, then it would skip NAS, and then 5 PHI and finally in 6th its Columbus.
SnS
Global Moderator
Would have been nice if the Flyers made the claim but they keep the trash playing nightly that they do.
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
See, the thing is, I actually checked the CBA and it's not precisely the same as the standings. Standings are normally points total, with percentage being the first tiebreaker. For waiver claims, however, per the CBA, you start with points percentage. See post #41 in this thread from when I was researching earlier. The relevant bit:
(ii) is for exceptions in which one is outside of the regular season (we're not), or before November 1st (we weren't).
Really it depends on how one reads the CBA - it says it's based on points percentage "at the time of the request for Waivers", which I'm interpreting as "therefore, since the request was midday on the 9th, don't include games played the evening of the 9th, or after that". And on the 9th, before playing that evening the Jackets were still a .500 team. So many other teams were in consideration.
Unless you've got a League source that clarifies the CBA further, then, I feel pretty confident in saying it was more than 5 teams.
uncleben
Global Moderator
Pretty sure you have it spot on.
Points percentage as of the time the player was put on waivers (the 9th, in this case). It was Nashville requesting waivers. The other teams, such as CBJ put in a claim.
CaptBrannigan
Registered User
It is points percentage. The waiver order is designed to give the ‘worst’ team first crack, a team with 6 points from 14 games would have a higher priority than a team with only 5 points in 10 games, despite the higher raw point total.
Roman Yoshi
#164303
Must be nice getting a free second pairing d man for nothing but cap space.
BackToTheBrierePatch
Eff Cancer
Breakers
Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Claimed to playing 25 minutes a night against a top 5 team in the nhl
4 points in 6 games and a +6
him and werenski as a pairing have 16 points in 6 games
Not bad indeed
I have no idea if he'll keep it up, but $2.5 on an expiring contract for a guy at his age with 300 games of experience who had previously shown strong play seemed like a no brainer
4 points in 6 games and a +6
him and werenski as a pairing have 16 points in 6 games
Not bad indeed
I have no idea if he'll keep it up, but $2.5 on an expiring contract for a guy at his age with 300 games of experience who had previously shown strong play seemed like a no brainer
Last edited:
Fabbro, himself, was not the problem. Preds fan have been saying this for a while.
- Nov 12, 2021
- 10,339
- 9,331
Bizarre waive.
Dude looks great
Dude looks great
dirtydanglez
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2022
- 6,024
- 6,217
funny another gm didn't offer a late pick for him.
Bjornar Moxnes
Fordi fellesskap fungerer
Non-contenders might have wanted to take a chance at waivers, while contenders not only don't have space, but maybe Nashville wanted a good pick for retention/wasn't willing. Like I'm willing to bet the Oilers inquired but didn't want to spend a good asset for possible retention.
the most obvious end to waiving him. One of the stupidest moves we've ever made.
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Waddell apparently explicitly didn't offer a pick because he figured he could get an eventual waiver claim in.
Jersey Fan 12
Positive Vibes
- Nov 20, 2006
- 7,491
- 3,274
Actually no. Had the Flyers claimed him he'd be getting coached by Brad Shaw; one of the better teachers of the defensive side of the game.
The improvement shown by players like Ristolainen, Seeler, (and before he was traded) Sean Walker is not a coincidence.
After thought draft picks like Emil Andrae, Zamula, and Grans are far exceeding expectations.
Don't see much reason for claiming Fabbro.
The Gr8 Dane
L'harceleur
BonMorrison
Registered User
Trotz and Brunette suck, man
Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 16,769
- 13,745
I've always pumped Fabbro's tires around here and figured he'd be showing well in his new location. I have to say, even I didn't quite expect him to do THIS well this soon.
I love to see it.
Whoever gets a chance at Tomasino or Parssinen on waivers, you better go for them. They are the next Tolvanen and Fabbro and they are probably coming soon to a waiver wire near you. It'll be the same story all over again. Because they are good young NHL players too.
I love to see it.
Whoever gets a chance at Tomasino or Parssinen on waivers, you better go for them. They are the next Tolvanen and Fabbro and they are probably coming soon to a waiver wire near you. It'll be the same story all over again. Because they are good young NHL players too.
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Latest posts
-
-
HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #90: 2024-2025 season part III- Latest: Beendair Donedat
-
