They didn’t have what Dubas wanted, which at the end of the day was Michael Bunting.and in spite of that, Vancouver *****still***** couldn't beat it.
Start the rumorsDubas is legit gonna drive Crosby to demand a trade.
all i have to say is LMAO to all the Pens fans saying it would take Lekkermaki/Willander + 1st minimum. Y'all couldn't even get a guaranteed 1st. This is definitely a quantity over quality deal wlthough the quantity isnt as bad as people are making it out to be. Its just being pointed out because of how Pens fans were so sure they'd get A tier prospects
The contracts that expire next year and not in 2027? And you keep your 1st? Yes, it would have looked much, much better.Would it have looked better if the Pens had Mikael Granlund, Nathan Legare, Jeff Petry. Jan Rutta and Casey DeSmith instead of Karlsson? To me it it would have sucked just as much!
again, for all the chest thumping Canucks fans are doing, they couldn't offer *anything* better.They didn’t have what Dubas wanted, which at the end of the day was Michael Bunting.
more like chose not to beat it. If they wanted to beat it they could have. They chose Lindholm over Guentzel originally since your GM overpriced his asset and it cost him in the endand in spite of that, Vancouver *****still***** couldn't beat it.
We gotta at least try him with Aho. Pay all this to play with Drury/KK? Svech and Necas flanking Drury is pretty interesting.For something a little different here:
PP bumper is a no-brainer. Plugging him into Bunting's spot 5v5:
Svechnikov - Aho - Teravainen
Guentzel - Drury - Necas
Martinook - Staal - Jarvis
Noesen - Kotkaniemi - Fast
If Kotkaniemi can find his game again, he could swap with Drury to have some size/jam on each line.
Carolina's built to have 2 strong wingers elevate a 3rd wheel center and that's okay to me. The net talent is the same. The position mix is just non-traditional.
He is. For being called Hockey’s Future there’s a surprising lack of knowledge about prospects.You wouldn't prefer Koivunen to Carolina's 1st this year? I'd say he's worth more.
Exactly this. And Bunting adds a lot to what the Pens lack, physicality and going to the net.Aren't these guys close to NHL ready? If so that's what Dubas is doing. He didn't give up on the core yet and need prospects that can play now and next year.
Might give up quality for that but it's because there is no time to wait
Canes will try and woo him.They might get him to resign, Canes are a legit good team,This is an incredible return for a pure rental. What are people smoking?
That was at the start of the season right? Koivunen had a great season for Karpat
He's worth at least a late 1st, and Ponomartov is worth at least a 2nd.
So it was around 1st + 2-3 2nds; except most of the equity is in players who are D+2 or D+3
The contracts that expire next year and not in 2027? And you keep your 1st? Yes, it would have looked much, much better.
He'll take a no tax state haircut probably. I could see him re-upping in Carolina if it goes well.Canucks will just sign him in the offseason.
Dude, sometimes you just gotta admit defeat. Having you and a couple of your buddies mansplain to us that you were going to get Hoglander who 'sucks' our first, whatever we got from Lindholm, maybe Lekkerimaki, etc. Is just a bad look and it's okay to admit you're disappointed.It's actually kinda funny that this deal seems like directly in the middle between what Canucks fans were offering and what Penguins fans were asking from the Canucks.
I think it's a mediocre return, but calling it anything more than that is an exaggeration. Koivunen and Ponomarev are both good and Lucius seems like someone useful. The way this trade hurts is because Pagnotta cock-teased everyone by suggesting Morrow and Blake were included.
Guentzel - Aho - TTWe gotta at least try him with Aho. Pay all this to play with Drury/KK? Svech and Necas flanking Drury is pretty interesting.